About RDD we are working now and start an outline that must be done
quickly on the features offered, points that still need adjustments
and a roadmap.
About xDevStudio I am testing an implementation of gettext in it, but
not yet finished writing it because I'm working too into help
routines.
I ho
Hi renato
Have you same update news regarding sqlrdd & xdevstudio?
2009/6/7 Vailton Renato
> > AFAIK we still miss something like Mediator or SQLRDD.
>
> We here in Brazil we have developed and tested a new RDD based on SQL
> LIB that will work similar to SQLRDD and the Mediator and to be
> subm
Hi,
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Or, RDDSQL itself may track these changes and automatically generate
the UPDATE/INSERT requests to SQL server. Given that the recordset
can be the result of any kind of queries, this doesn't seem to be doable
(seemed a good idea for a few minutes though :).
The probl
I see. Overall to me RDDSQL looks like a proper and common wrapper
implementation to our existing and not very much compatible
solutions:
HBPGSQL, HBMYSQL, HBFBIRD and HBODBC. And instead of direct
API calls and Harbour classes it makes this functionality accessible
through the existing Harbour
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> I see. Overall to me RDDSQL looks like a proper and common wrapper
> implementation to our existing and not very much compatible solutions:
> HBPGSQL, HBMYSQL, HBFBIRD and HBODBC. And instead of direct
> API calls and Harbour classes it makes
Thanks Przemek. Useful insights, they confirm my concerns.
Actually, since I see no chances that we will have an open source
Mediator clone any time soon, for me the best option still seems
remote access, and that means GTNET. Currently you solve it on
*nix servers only, but it would be very good
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
> I see. Overall to me RDDSQL looks like a proper and common wrapper
> implementation to our existing and not very much compatible solutions:
> HBPGSQL, HBMYSQL, HBFBIRD and HBODBC. And instead of direct
> API calls and Harbour classes it makes this
Hi Mindaugas,
>> RDDSQL can make a very nice one-way interface to SQL DBs.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by saying "one-way". Do you mean it is a read
> only? The answer is: Yes and No.
>
> It does not generate hidden queries. It means, that
> SOMEFIELD := value
> will not generate SQL query an
Hello Angel,
Thanks a lot.
Regards.
Sudip
Angel Pais wrote:
>
> HI Sudip
>
>
> Sudip Bhattacharyya escribió:
>> Hello Angel Pais,
>>
>> I felt really bad reading your mail.
>
> That wasn`t the intention. Just a general warning. I've seen this happen
> in xharbour.org. When there where f
Hi,
one more letter about RDDSQL. Actually it was not asked yet, but I feel
it is a naturally the next question.
Does RDDSQL supports indexing?
The answer is: Yes and No. :) Well, actually I would say much much more
Yes, than No.
RDDSQL DOES NOT generates hidden queries. Code:
DBUSEAREA
Hi,
RDDSQL can make a very nice one-way interface to SQL DBs.
I'm not sure what you mean by saying "one-way". Do you mean it is a read
only? The answer is: Yes and No.
It does not generate hidden queries. It means, that
SOMEFIELD := value
will not generate SQL query and execute "UPDATE
Massimo Belgrano wrote:
with sqlrdd and mediatior you can migrate with very little changes in
the xBase source code. Only to declare the RDD, a function call to
connect to the database and a substitution for the function file() for
an equivalent that returns the presence of the table
Hi,
yes
Hi Mindaugas,
>>> For me f.e. it's not very clear what is the difference
>>> between xhb SQLRDD and our RDDSQL.
>
> Victor, please read below. It's an old text, but I deleted some complicated
> parts, replaced some old names with new one hoping that it will help to
> catch the main idea. If it is
In my view are different tools for different purposes.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
>
> Massimo, you are making things more confusing (as it happens many times).
Sorry for my confusing and for my bad English
>> sqlrdd from harbour com can be used as complete replacement for an
>> application written using dbfcdx
>
> These is no such thing "harbour com", there is xharbour.com. Ple
Hi,
Massimo, you are making things more confusing (as it happens many times).
sqlrdd from harbour com can be used as complete replacement for an
application written using dbfcdx
These is no such thing "harbour com", there is xharbour.com. Please,
feel the difference between harbour and xhar
This project is being developed under USRRDD and we are finalizing the
SEEK with indices compounds (two or more fields) and providing some
examples and details of the resources that we have done and are
missing (not yet 100% complete because there are many details
involved)
We plan that accept the
Hi Vailton,
Sounds very good.
Brdgs,
Viktor
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Vailton Renato wrote:
>> AFAIK we still miss something like Mediator or SQLRDD.
>
> We here in Brazil we have developed and tested a new RDD based on SQL
> LIB that will work similar to SQLRDD and the Mediator and to be
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> Here i can help you
> sqlrdd from harbour com can be used as complete replacement for an
> application written using dbfcdx
> you must change file("test.dbc") to sr_file() and optimise set filter,
> populating intelligent recorset for having
it is a very good information
i know that your product are always good : SQL LIB RDD& xDevStudio
do you plan submit to harbour?
2009/6/7 Vailton Renato :
>> AFAIK we still miss something like Mediator or SQLRDD.
>
> We here in Brazil we have developed and tested a new RDD based on SQL
> LIB that
Here i can help you
sqlrdd from harbour com can be used as complete replacement for an
application written using dbfcdx
you must change file("test.dbc") to sr_file() and optimise set filter,
populating intelligent recorset for having better performance
I have converted one big application in few da
> AFAIK we still miss something like Mediator or SQLRDD.
We here in Brazil we have developed and tested a new RDD based on SQL
LIB that will work similar to SQLRDD and the Mediator and to be
submitted soon...
We hope to finalize some details to release this tool together with
source code for acce
Guys,
Few times I see issues here which would better appear
on a user list, and I agree that an - active - user
list and also "evangelist" work would really do good
service for Harbour, but this very thread certainly
wasn't among those ones.
Just take it easy, I'm sure you've misinterpreted some
Hello Angel Pais,
I felt really bad reading your mail.
I joined this list advised by Pritpal Bedi, when I started using GTWVG and
faced many problems. IMHO, he advised me to join in this list, because my
queries may be helpful for betterment of the software, or I shall get
answers from "develope
Hello Xavi,
Thanks a lot for your mail.
I was waiting for your mail :)
>Learn SQL! MySQL and PostgreSQL are servers of SQL and this means that .-
>SQL it's used for abstracted physical data from the application using it.
>You send text SQL commands to server and receives, if no error, aff
Hi Sudip and everybody,
I'm not an "expert in-depth" in PostgreSQL but of course I'll try my best.
what should be "your"
suggestion to start with - MySql, PostgreSql or any other?
Learn SQL! MySQL and PostgreSQL are servers of SQL and this means that .-
SQL it's used for abstracted ph
Hello Xavi,
> So... How many times faster than postgres should be? 8-) hmm... Ok no
> marketing with postgres. :)
May be I am out of the track, but I can't resist myself to know about
PostgreSql from you ;)
I have no experience about prosgreSql. I have little experience about MySql.
In HMG Forum
So, how can we use it? May be a silly question, ...
It's a very intelligent question but ... even if free, would be better than
other solutions to choose wisely.
It's 5 times faster than Oracle hmm... Ok costly 5 times more. :(
So... How many times faster than postgres should be? 8-)
Pritpal Bedi wrote:
>
> Yep
>
>
> Angel Pais wrote:
>>
>> Not published in their site.
>> So expect a very restrictive and expensive one.
>> Some old mesages (googled) talk about $175.000 per CPU
>>
>
> Cache is a costly database. That is why I never dared to offer this lib.
>
> Regards
Yep
Angel Pais wrote:
>
> Not published in their site.
> So expect a very restrictive and expensive one.
> Some old mesages (googled) talk about $175.000 per CPU
>
Cache is a costly database. That is why I never dared to offer this lib.
Regards
Pritpal Bedi
--
View this message in context:
Compliment,Compliment,Compliment
Impressive also Documentation
This can be a great opportunity for most developer so it is a special
day for most of us
with few line we can integrate our application with InterSystems
Caché®, we are working with a high-performance object database that
runs SQL five
Hello Everybody
Today is a special day in my life and I have
decided to share one of my best developments with all of you.
Let me introduce CacheRDD, a real-time RDBMS RDD for
Harbour family of compilers. This is the FIRST RDD in whole history
of xbase dialect that is a TRUE RDBMS RDD. Please v
32 matches
Mail list logo