On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Massimo Belgrano<mbelgr...@deltain.it> wrote:
> Here i can help you
> sqlrdd from harbour com can be used as complete replacement for an
> application written using dbfcdx
> you must change file("test.dbc") to sr_file() and optimise set filter,
> populating intelligent recorset for having better performance
> I have converted one big application in few day to sql server and
> also oracle using demoThank you. Is performance good? Is there any catch, drawback of this sort of solution? > Mediator OTC http://www.otc.pl/index.asp?s=19&l=2 made a similar > works but require a program on server side like letodb > Either emulate recno(),deleted(), set order to , seek. you can migrate > in few day I didn't know it needs a server side component. > rddsql not support any index command (cdx), > is a clean access to sql world and is good for integrate same sql > table in existing application Okay, I see now the differences. > i vote for maintain this mailing open to any info regarding knowledge > compiler,database,os Yes, but that still doesn't solve the user support issue. Since Harbour is the direct successor of Clipper, maybe comp.lang.clipper could be the proper place. Our user mailing list can't really catch up, and a mailing list isn't the best medium for users as few ppl will want to subscribe just to ask one question. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
