Revision: 11085
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11085&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-19 06:20:47 + (Tue, 19 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-19 08:19 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.pt_BR.p
Revision: 11084
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11084&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-19 05:39:40 + (Tue, 19 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-19 07:31 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* external/sqlite3/sqlite3.
Revision: 11083
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11083&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-19 05:21:24 + (Tue, 19 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-19 07:20 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* contrib/hbwin/win_reg.prg
> The development in this direction got stalled due to attention
> to QT implementation. At a given point of time one may have
> limited times.
>
> HBWHAT was not bad either. It needs just few tweaks and by far
> the most comprehensive API so far. Perhaps we need more resources
> to join the effort
Hello
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
> As for lightweight winapi, HBWHAT had a lot of problems, so
> it's no more. Some WINAPI's are now implemented
> (hopefully properly) as WAPI_*() functions in HBWIN. But
> this effort seem to have stalled.
>
Not exactly.
The development in this direction got st
Hi Mindaugas,
I'd certainly welcome your lightweight AX implementation,
this way hopefully not every contrib would need to reinvent
it again and again.
As for lightweight winapi, HBWHAT had a lot of problems, so
it's no more. Some WINAPI's are now implemented
(hopefully properly) as WAPI_*() func
Sorry Mindaugas
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
>
> my name is Mindaugas. I've tried to joke a few times writing Pritpul,
> but it seems you are not enough sharp-eyed to notice the difference
> neither in spelling of my name nor in yours.
>
I did notice. At times a foreign name tends to have
Hello Mindaugus
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
>
> I've extended my previous sample by:
>
> nAddr := MakeWndProc( {|X,Y,Z,T| WndProc( X,Y,Z,T ) } )
Can you make this function public. Probably this may pave the
way to clean a non-portable part of GTWVG, whio knows.
Just to put everything t
Pritpal Bedi wrote:
Hi Mindaugus
Hi Pritpal,
my name is Mindaugas. I've tried to joke a few times writing Pritpul,
but it seems you are not enough sharp-eyed to notice the difference
neither in spelling of my name nor in yours.
Regards,
Mindaugas
Hi Pritpal,
Not is another issue is the same except that now, with the patch, not repeated
infinitely and my old application will work.
The logic of call control function is different to Clipper. Could to say
something Maurilio?
I'm more worried about leaving the application.
Xavi
Pritpa
Francesco Saverio Giudice wrote:
Are these two different things the same ActiveX?
I will look at Pritpal's upload, but, as I wrote before, I would like to
have an independent (from gtwvg) version.
I've extended my previous sample by:
===
Hi Mindaugas,
Il 18/05/2009 23.13, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas ha scritto:
Hi Francesco,
in the past I've wrote some code to "include Internet Explorer window
into my dialogs as a separate control". Using some sample on the
internet I've implemented: IOleInPlaceFrame, IOleClientSite,
IOleInPlaceS
Hi Mindaugus
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
>
> I've tried to add ActiveX to my plain WinAPI Hello world sample. I
> needed to add *TWO* lines (marked by /* !!!*/) below and #pragma
> begindump/enddump. THAT'S ALL! I understand that event handler is
> missing and OleAutomation object should b
Revision: 11082
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11082&view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2009-05-18 21:28:54 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 14:26 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
* harbour/contrib/gtwvg/wvgsi
Hi Francesco,
in the past I've wrote some code to "include Internet Explorer window
into my dialogs as a separate control". Using some sample on the
internet I've implemented: IOleInPlaceFrame, IOleClientSite,
IOleInPlaceSite interfaces (3 dozens methods), used IOleObject,
IHTMLDocument2, IW
Hi Mindaugas, Pritpal,
I was just writing about and Mindaugas sent this mail, great!
I was thinking about adding a separate handling for ActiveX code to
leave isolate as Ole code we already have, so it will be enough (!) to
add an upper layer where ActiveX can attach itself without needs of
gt
Hi,
I've tried to add ActiveX to my plain WinAPI Hello world sample. I
needed to add *TWO* lines (marked by /* !!!*/) below and #pragma
begindump/enddump. THAT'S ALL! I understand that event handler is
missing and OleAutomation object should be created, but this is not so
much code. I have a
Revision: 11081
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11081&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 19:37:06 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 21:36 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
Hi,
Pritpal Bedi wrote:
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
The middle part of mail window is not redrawn, but I get no error.
It means ActiveX is not initialized even.
I will apply your changes and will do some tests todays.
Till then...
wvgax.prg wvgsink.c if full of commented out code, ful
> .mo are gettext compatible compiled .po files. I plan to add support
> for native gettext usage and in such case it will use .mo files by
> gettext API resepcting domain names and .mo file localization (it's
> strictly defined), etc.
[snip]
>
> In summary.
> I'll add support for .mo files as alte
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
> The problem is we already use .hbl for compiled language files, so
> I cannot make above change.
> These are my questions:
> - Is there any better idea how to cleanup these file extensions?
> - The standard extension for compiled .po language files
Revision: 11080
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11080&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 17:47:43 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 19:46 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
Hello
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
>
> The middle part of mail window is not redrawn, but I get no error.
>
It means ActiveX is not initialized even.
I will apply your changes and will do some tests todays.
Till then...
Regards
Pritpal Bedi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.n
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
The only ODBC application I've ever tried to write in my life is
contrib/rddsql/sddodbc/tests/test1.prg, so, I have no idea that the
answer is. I would expect to be it a little slower on client part (I
mean result set manipulation).
I found some quite old "resea
Revision: 11079
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11079&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 16:08:14 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 18:03 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
Revision: 11078
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11078&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 15:54:39 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 17:54 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
Revision: 11077
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11077&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 15:51:53 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 17:51 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
*
The problem is we already use .hbl for compiled language files, so
I cannot make above change.
How about .hblib? No requirements that extensions be 3 chars, it's
more just a habit.
Not just a habit, Harbour (and of course hbmk2) also supports
DOS, and potentially other such limited OSes/file
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
The problem is we already use .hbl for compiled language files, so
I cannot make above change.
How about .hblib? No requirements that extensions be 3 chars, it's more just a
habit.
Regards
Alex
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbou
Revision: 11076
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11076&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 14:08:27 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 15:59 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
Hi,
1. I notice this error when i run prg with hbrun :
$ ./td.prg ( or$ hbrun td.prg )
Error BASE/6101 Unknown or unregistered symbol: HB_GT_CGI_DEFAULT (Quit)
Error BASE/6101 Unknown or unregistered symbol: HB_GT_CGI_DEFAULT
Called from HB_HRBRUN(0)
( I know that i can m
Hi All,
I used .hbp for library parameter files in hbmk2, but this is not very
clear for most ppl, as they think it's a "project" file (not suprisingly).
Now, I'm thinking how to make this more intuitive, and one solution
could be to use .hbl for library parameter files (as Harbour Library),
and
Hello Pritpul,
I've put my hands a to change gtwvg to be compatible with OLE
implementation, but I'm unable to test changes. Does anyone have gtwvg
sample with working (or GPFing) ActiveX controls. I've tried to use
contrib/gtwvg/tests samples. They do not give any error, but demowvg
window is
Hello all,
This error, still persists:
[ERROR]
Error description: Error BASE/3012 Argument error: NEW
Args:
[ 1] = N 1470288
Stack Calls
===
Called from: => HB_OLEAUTO:NEW(0)
Called from: classes\ACTIVEX.PRG => TACTIVEX:NEW(0)
Called from: webexp.prg => MAIN(1
The native interface is much faster than ODBC and ADO, because they
usually represent a layer on the native DLL if I remember well. So
here in the company we use whenever possible direct access to the
native DLL.
Regards,
Vailton Renato
___
Harbour maili
Hi,
Alex Strickland wrote:
* harbour/contrib/rddsql/Makefile
+ implemented ODBC driver for RDDSQL
Thank you for these major contributions.
Out of interest, and in your opinion, does using ODBC instead of native
libraries make a big performance difference?
The only ODBC application I
Anyone else getting this after responding to the confirmation email?
Error
Could not find nomination with that confirmation hash, or nominations
are already confirmed.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.
I was looking at letodb and there was some use of the the $ operator
to search in arrays. However, this would crash in Harbour.
Is there any good *technical* reason not to implement this in
Harbour? It's use with arrays certainly feels intuitive.
It's a hidden extension very difficult to tr
Hi all
I was looking at letodb and there was some use of the the $ operator to search
in arrays. However, this would crash in Harbour.
Is there any good *technical* reason not to implement this in Harbour? It's use
with arrays certainly feels intuitive.
Thanks
Alex
_
On Mon, 18 May 2009, vszak...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hi,
> 2009-05-18 11:19 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
> * bin/hb-func.sh
> ! HB_USER_LIBS_DEF -> CC_HB_USER_LIBS
> ; QUESTION: Is it a problem to move these to HB_ namespace?
> * source/rtl/lang.c
> ! Fixed
Revision: 11075
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11075&view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2009-05-18 09:24:44 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 11:33 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/source/vm/ite
Revision: 11074
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11074&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 09:20:34 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 11:19 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* bin/hb-func.sh
! HB_U
an internal distro with some extra bundled libs.
HB_USER_LIBS is used as default library list by hb* scripts.
I wanted to use the same name. We can change of course but it
should be synced with envvar name used by hb* scripts.
To have the same end-result without such side-effect,
maybe readi
Hi Przemek,
2009-05-15 09:21 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* include/hbextern.ch
* source/rtl/Makefile
+ source/rtl/lang.c
+ Added HB_USERLANG() function to retrieve ietf code of
language set by user. Works also on Windows.
In this code and also in other places you
Revision: 11073
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11073&view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2009-05-18 08:55:06 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 11:03 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/source/rtl/fi
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
>> 2009-05-14 19:20 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
>> * harbour/bin/hb-func.sh
>>* respect HB_USER_LIBS creating hbmk.cfg
> Is this for sure what you intented? I'm asking because
> this way someone building Harbour while ha
On Fri, 15 May 2009, vszak...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hi,
> 2009-05-15 09:21 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
> * include/hbextern.ch
> * source/rtl/Makefile
> + source/rtl/lang.c
> + Added HB_USERLANG() function to retrieve ietf code of
> language set by user.
Revision: 11072
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11072&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 07:58:12 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 09:57 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* contrib/rddsql/sddmy/mysq
snaipe...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
* harbour/contrib/rddsql/Makefile
+ implemented ODBC driver for RDDSQL
Thank you for these major contributions.
Out of interest, and in your opinion, does using ODBC instead of native
libraries make a big performance difference?
Regards
Alex
___
49 matches
Mail list logo
