Hello
Viktor Szakáts wrote: > > As for lightweight winapi, HBWHAT had a lot of problems, so > it's no more. Some WINAPI's are now implemented > (hopefully properly) as WAPI_*() functions in HBWIN. But > this effort seem to have stalled. > Not exactly. The development in this direction got stalled due to attention to QT implementation. At a given point of time one may have limited times. HBWHAT was not bad either. It needs just few tweaks and by far the most comprehensive API so far. Perhaps we need more resources to join the effort. Of course, Mindaugas's contribution, if he decides to this effect, could prove to be a big boost to Windows developers. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Errors-with-11032-tp23521549p23607506.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
