When running guix in a VM I usually run into various connectivity
problems. VirtualBox on Windows seems to do some helpful FTP
transparent proxying which breaks everything and in another case I
don't have internet connectivity due to how the VM is set up.
Is there a way to make guix-daemon talk to
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
wrote:
> Is there a way to make guix-daemon talk to a proxy when downloading
> substitutions and source archives?
>
> I tried starting it with http_proxy set, but I'm not sure it responded
> to it (as I'm writing
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
> wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to make guix-daemon talk to a proxy when downloading
>> substitutions and source archives?
>>
>> I tried starting it with
On 15-Jun-2015 8:56 am, "Pjotr Prins" wrote:
>
> Is there a way guix could quickly print out the information it now gives
after
> a successful package install:
>
> The following environment variable definitions may be needed:
>export
PATH="/home/pjotrp/.guix-profile/bin:/home/pjotrp/.guix-prof
On Jun 15, 2015 10:11 PM, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote:
> "Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)" skribis:
>
> > Some of this is already in ~/.guix-profile/etc/profile. Maybe there
should
> > be more in there? Or are even all of the search paths in there?
>
>
On Jun 16, 2015 10:27 PM, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote:
>
> While looking at another package manager for ideas to steal, I found
> this one to be a good candidate:
>
> guix edit gcc-4.8
Looks familiar. OSX Homebrew? Anyway, it's an awesome idea and deserves
being stolen.
> For “regular users,” it’s
>From 7df5b2d6c71d7de70e4af59f1944c87c0b0ce807 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Claes Wallin
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 20:12:09 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu/package/pv.scm (pv): New file, new variable
Signed-off-by: Claes Wallin
---
gnu/packages/pv.scm | 51
Argh. Why is there always some small detail you don't notice until you
posted, even in a small file like this?
Removed commented-out lines.
0001-gnu-package-pv.scm-pv-New-file-new-variable.patch
Description: Binary data
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
wrote:
> Argh. Why is there always some small detail you don't notice until you
> posted, even in a small file like this?
>
> Removed commented-out lines.
Bump?
0001-gnu-package-pv.scm-pv-New-file-new-variable.patch
Description: Binary data
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Alex Kost wrote:
> Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) (2015-06-19 21:51 +0300) wrote:
> I think there is no need in this ↑ line. The commit message should be:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> gnu: Add pv.
>
> * g
How do people compile guix directly from git source? I've been
searching around in HACKING and manual.html#Contributing and other
places, the internet in general, and haven't been able to find any
instructions.
It ought to be:
1. Get dependencies manually or with 'guix environment guix'.
2. acloc
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Alex Kost wrote:
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> gnu: Add pv.
>
> * gnu/package/pv.scm (pv): New file.
> * gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
> --8<---cut here---end--->8---
>
> And
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
> "Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)" writes:
>
>> How do people compile guix directly from git source? I've been
>> searching around in HACKING and manual.html#Contributing and other
>> places, the internet in gen
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)" skribis:
>
>> How do people compile guix directly from git source? I've been
>> searching around in HACKING and manual.html#Contributing and other
>> places, the internet in gen
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Ricardo Wurmus
wrote:
> Thompson, David writes:
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Ricardo Wurmus
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Would it be feasible to give "GUIX_ENVIRONMENT" the package name as a
>>> value instead of just "t"?
>>
>> Not really, because 'guix environment'
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Ricardo Wurmus
> wrote:
>> Thompson, David writes:
>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Ricardo Wurmus
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Would it be fea
Adds the common skalibs library and the execline shell-like language.
I'm wondering if the commands of the language belong in bin or if they
maybe should be in libexec/execline. They have pretty generic names
and might clash with other packages.
Either way I think patch #0003 is important, as it
On 26-Jun-2015 3:33 pm, "Alex Kost" wrote:
> Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) (2015-06-25 00:35 +0300) wrote:
> > From e93d21889bdcbed02a517f30d8401a3bb144cce4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Claes Wallin
> > Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 20:12:09 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH
On Jun 28, 2015 10:38 PM, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote:
> "Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)" skribis:
> > +(search-paths
> > + (list (search-path-specification
> > +(variable "CPATH")
> > +(files '("include")
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)" skribis:
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Ricardo Wurmus
>> wrote:
>>> I’m mostly using “guix environment” with a single package name, and for
>>> that purpose it wou
On 30-Jun-2015 3:08 pm, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote:
> Evan Rowley skribis:
>
> > (file-systems (cons (file-system
> > (device
> > "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-WDC_WD20EURS-63SPKY0_WD-WMC300539593-part3")
> > (title "root")
> > (mount-
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)" skribis:
>
>> So *that's* what the mysterious (title 'label) means!
>
> It’s not that mysterious:
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/File-Systems.html
>
> :-)
Ow, the burn. :-)
On Jul 1, 2015 3:32 PM, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote:
> > I'm working on s6, and it
> > expects -lexecline to work. Currently I'm feeding its configure
> > "--with-lib=.../lib/execline", would be nice to get that done in
> > execline instead. Modifying LIBRARY_PATH has no effect, what do I need
> > to
On Jul 1, 2015 4:02 PM, "Thompson, David" wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > I reckon it has the unfortunate property of not working out of the box
> > (except on GuixSD.) I’m sure many tools these days would choose to
> > hard-code a fancy colored PS1; while I
On Jul 3, 2015 6:44 AM, "John Darrington"
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 12:38:49AM +, Cook, Malcolm wrote:
>> The sys admin at my institute expresses concern that we would
potentially expose ourselves to additional security risk by building
scientific software stack in Guix where we m
On Jul 4, 2015 5:14 PM, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote:
> "Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)" skribis:
> >> > I'm working on s6, and it
> >> > expects -lexecline to work. Currently I'm feeding its configure
> >> > "--with-lib=.../lib/execl
On 04-Jul-2015 4:22 pm, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote:
> A related concern is the time it takes to actually deploy the fixed
> binaries on your machine. This is discussed at:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Security-Updates.html
Ok, this is great. Gives sysadmins a chance to a
On Jul 5, 2015 10:16 AM, "Mark H Weaver" wrote:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> > "Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)" skribis:
> >
> >> So *that's* what the mysterious (title 'label) means!
> >
> > It’s not that mysterious:
>
>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2015 10:38 PM, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote:
>> "Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)" skribis:
>> Please start the .patch with a brief description of what it does, and
>> its upstream status (like “Ups
From: Claes Wallin
* pumpio.scn (pumpa): Update gitorious.org URL to branchable.com URL.
---
gnu/packages/pumpio.scm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm b/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm
index 4a6375f..26d7b4a 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm
+
From: Claes Wallin
---
gnu/packages/pumpio.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm b/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm
index 26d7b4a..22c631e 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
(define-public pum
From: Claes Wallin
* gnu/packages/pumpio.scm (pumpa): Update gitorious.org URL to branchable.com
URL.
---
gnu/packages/pumpio.scm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm b/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm
index 4a6375f..26d7b4a 100644
--- a/gnu/package
From: Claes Wallin
* gnu/packages/pumpio.scm (pumpa): Update version to 0.9.1.
---
gnu/packages/pumpio.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm b/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm
index 26d7b4a..22c631e 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm
+++ b/g
Ok! Sending the merged patch. Sorry for the patch spam, still figuring out the
git-send-mail way of working.
--
/c
From: Claes Wallin
* gnu/packages/pumpio.scm (pumpa): Update gitorious.org URL to branchable.com
URL.
* gnu/packages/pumpio.scm (pumpa): Update version to 0.9.1.
---
gnu/packages/pumpio.scm | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm b/gnu/p
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
> "Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)" writes:
>
>> From: Claes Wallin
>>
>> * gnu/packages/pumpio.scm (pumpa): Update gitorious.org URL to
>> branchable.com URL.
>> * gnu/packages/pumpio.scm (pumpa): Update
On Jul 9, 2015 7:49 PM, "Mathieu Lirzin" wrote:
>
> One last thing before pushing. :)
>
> Following the
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-07/msg00235.html
> discussion, I want to know if the usage of the email address
> instead of
> in your patch was intentionnal?
Do you mean
On 12-Jul-2015 10:57 pm, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote:
> > * gnu/package/skarnet.scm (skalibs): New file.
> > * gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
>
> Applied with a slight change to the description to make it a sentence.
> > * gnu/package/skarnet.scm (execline): New variable.
>
> Finally ap
On Jul 18, 2015 5:13 PM, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote:
> "Cook, Malcolm" skribis:
>
> > However
> >
> > ./pre-inst-env guix package -i hello
> >
> > Gives me
> >
> > guix package: error: build failed: the build users group
`guix-builder' has no members
> >
> > But, but, I do have a group `
On Jul 8, 2015 2:57 PM, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote:
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-rpy2.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-rpy2, python2-rpy2): New variables.
> > +(license gpl2+)))
>
> R being GPLv3+, this should be the same.
I understand the reasoning
On Jul 20, 2015 5:56 PM, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote:
> "Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)" skribis:
> >> > +(license gpl2+)))
> >>
> >> R being GPLv3+, this should be the same.
> >
> > I understand the reasoning that a package is more user-or
On 16-Aug-2015 2:19 pm, "David Thompson" wrote:
Great! I ran into this when trying to compile and run guix on a machine at
work, where I'm not root.
I was planning to run guix as a stow of steroids. But I'm still wondering
whether what I'm attempting is even intended to be possible? Of course, I
[Reposting with correct sender. Sorry, David.]
Great! I ran into this when trying to compile and run guix on a machine at
work, where I'm not root.
I was planning to run guix as a stow of steroids. But I'm still wondering
whether what I'm attempting is even intended to be possible? Of course, I
w
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
wrote:
> [Reposting with correct sender. Sorry, David.]
>
> Great! I ran into this when trying to compile and run guix on a machine at
> work, where I'm not root.
>
> I was planning to run guix as a stow of steroids.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Eric Bavier
wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:45:28 +0200
> Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
>> wrote:
>> > [Reposting with correct sender. Sorry, David.]
>> >
>> > Grea
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
wrote:
> Now I'm doing this:
>
> git clean -fxd && # recover from previous attempts
> git checkout HEAD . && # ditto
> gettextize --po-dir=po{/guix,/packages,} &&
> sed -re '/^[[:blank:]]*p
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Eric Bavier
> wrote:
>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/guix.html#Build-Environment-Setup
>>>
>>> "If you are installing Guix as an unprivileged user
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Thompson, David
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Eric Bavier
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:45:28 +0200
>> Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) wrote:
>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/guix.html#Build-Environment-Setup
>>
I'm almost done talking to myself, I promise. This is just all very exciting.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
> wrote:
>
>> Now I'm doing this:
>>
>> git clean -fxd &
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Thompson, David
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
> wrote:
>>> I think that to really make unprivileged use of Guix work acceptably,
>>> we need to use the user namespaces feature first introduced in Linux
&g
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Eric Bavier
wrote:
> I have experimented with this a bit lately. It works to some extent,
> but I have had to apply a few patches to some package recipes. Some
> packages have failing tests (where presumably they would pass or be
> skipped in the chroot), which
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> And who else can (with some likelihood) come to Brussels if February? FOSDEM
> is
> my favorite conference and there is something for everyone involved in FOSS.
Thanks for the heads-up! Been meaning to go to FOSDEM for years.
Next year it
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Eric Bavier
wrote:
> On 2015-08-17 15:46, Claes Wallin wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Eric Bavier
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I have experimented with this a bit lately. It works to some extent,
>>> but I have had to apply a few patches to some package recipes
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Eric Bavier
wrote:
>> Any patches related to bootstrapping gcc? I'm getting lib/lib64 confusion.
>
>
> Yes, that's been one issue.
>
> Attached are the patches I have so far. Hopefully they can get you a bit
> further. I've been able to build a number of packag
On Aug 19, 2015 10:57 AM, "Amirouche Boubekki"
wrote:
>> On a similar note, I like a lot the idea of Andy Wingo `guix install`
>> and `guix search`.
>
>
> To be precise I prefer, `guix package install` and `guix package search`
(which is not the subject of patch of Andy Wingo).
The point is exac
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> To pick up a thread from May, I was poking at elogind recently. A bit
> of recap as to how things got here, then the status.
[ . . . ]
> I want GNOME on Guix :) GNOME used to support ConsoleKit but doesn't
> any more. There is a
56 matches
Mail list logo
