On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) <g...@clacke.user.lysator.liu.se> wrote: > On Jun 28, 2015 10:38 PM, "Ludovic Courtès" <l...@gnu.org> wrote: >> "Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)" <g...@clacke.user.lysator.liu.se> skribis:
>> Please start the .patch with a brief description of what it does, and >> its upstream status (like “Upstream commit XYZ”, or “Submitted upstream >> at http://...”.) > > Ok. I'll rename it too, as s6 turned out to need the same patch as > well. It's not guix-specific, they actually don't compile from source. > It's funny. After talking with the author, an explicit --with-lib made the problem go away, no patch necessary. Apparently GNU make has a special case where it knows how to interpret -lmylib listed as a dependency. >> > + #:modules ((guix build utils) >> > + (guix build gnu-build-system) >> > + (ice-9 popen)) >> >> Replace the first two with: >> >> ,@%gnu-build-system-modules ... so this part is not even necessary any more. >> Could you send updated patches? > > Will do! And here they are. I improved (shortened) the wording for the descriptions and fixed the formatting for the commit message.
0001-gnu-Add-skalibs.patch
Description: Binary data
0002-gnu-Add-execline.patch
Description: Binary data
