[PATCH] gnu: guile-next: Increase timeout.

2016-10-08 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
* gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-next)[properties]: Set timeout to 20 hours. --- gnu/packages/guile.scm | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/guile.scm b/gnu/packages/guile.scm index 0890f19..7361f1f 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/guile.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/guile.scm @@ -220

Re: WIP pypy3.3 - tests still fail? Anyone see why?

2016-10-08 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
and the patch... --- /tmp/sysconfig_pypy.py 2016-09-14 00:38:36.325334296 +0200 +++ pypy3.3-v5.2.0-alpha1-src/lib-python/3/distutils/sysconfig_pypy.py 2016-09-14 00:37:55.068908258 +0200 @@ -123,6 +123,19 @@ optional C speedup components. """ if compiler.compiler_type == "unix": +

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread Roel Janssen
Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Hi Guix, > > our build of the “texmaker” package is broken ever since we disabled the > webkit module of our Qt package. I’m currently looking into packaging > up the needed Qt modules, but the obvious question remains: do we want > this? “qtwebengine” not only bundles

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread John Darrington
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 09:17:30PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: Hi Guix, our build of the ???texmaker??? package is broken ever since we disabled the webkit module of our Qt package. I???m currently looking into packaging up the needed Qt modules, but the obvious questio

Re: [PATCH 3/3] gnu: Add CUPS service.

2016-10-08 Thread Andy Wingo
On Fri 07 Oct 2016 22:24, Andy Wingo writes: > * gnu/services/cups.scm: New file. > * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add gnu/services/cups.scm. > * doc/guix.texi (Printing Services): New section. With this, I can print :) Status: * There are no foomatic PPD's, as we have not packaged foom

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi, On Fri, 07 Oct 2016 21:17:30 +0200 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > our build of the “texmaker” package is broken ever since we disabled the > webkit module of our Qt package. I’m currently looking into packaging > up the needed Qt modules, but the obvious question remains: do we want > this? “qtweb

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread David Craven
> What do you think? The alternative is to drop Texmaker and all the > other packages that depend on Chromium as distributed by Qt. Weren't you vocal on IRC about bundling and the hell it brings? Sounds like bundling is ok when it suits you... :) To be fair I've looked into packaging chromium (wi

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Danny Milosavljevic writes: > On Fri, 07 Oct 2016 21:17:30 +0200 > Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> our build of the “texmaker” package is broken ever since we disabled the >> webkit module of our Qt package. I’m currently looking into packaging >> up the needed Qt modules, but the obvious question re

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
David Craven writes: >> What do you think? The alternative is to drop Texmaker and all the >> other packages that depend on Chromium as distributed by Qt. > > Weren't you vocal on IRC about bundling and the hell it brings? Sounds > like bundling is ok when it suits you... :) I have no problems

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Roel Janssen writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: >> What do you think? The alternative is to drop Texmaker and all the >> other packages that depend on Chromium as distributed by Qt. > > I'm not super familiar with Qt modules anymore, but can't we just > package the QtWebKit module? How does QtWe

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread David Craven
> I have no problems dropping Texmaker. I’m not even using it. That would be a shame, but I'm not using it either... I don't think there's a problem with bundling in this case, I just don't understand why you where against bundling in cargo's case, but not this one, that's all. I'm all for strivi

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
David Craven writes: >> I have no problems dropping Texmaker. I’m not even using it. > > That would be a shame, but I'm not using it either... I don't think > there's a problem with bundling in this case, I just don't understand > why you where against bundling in cargo's case, but not this one

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread David Craven
> We’ve gone to great lengths to avoid bundling in providing other > packages. See the Java bootstrap, for example, or Ruby. I don’t think > it’s “perfectionist” to apply the same standards to other languages and > build systems. Maybe it wasn't such a good idea, but since crates are distributed

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi, On Sat, 08 Oct 2016 11:16:03 +0200 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > as part of our default Qt package. Software that does depend on > “qtwebengine”, however, can only be built when the module exists, which > is why I’d like to package it separately. Oh, then I agree - as long as the qtwebengine pac

Re: [PATCH (3)] gnu: Add NFS related services (moved idmap.conf out of /etc, added texinfo markup to documentation, s/dir/directory)

2016-10-08 Thread John Darrington
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:49:36PM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote: However, as mentioned at , I think it would be best to achieve this by extending ???file-system-service-type???. Could you try

Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc

2016-10-08 Thread David Craven
> I was wondering what happened to musl? Are there any problems left, > anything the people you have been working with can help you to solve? I > had the impression it was almost ready. Depends on what you consider ready. It's ready for creating a gcc6 musl toolchain... If you want to use it for g

Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] build-system: Add asdf-build-system.

2016-10-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Andy, Andy Patterson skribis: > On Fri, 07 Oct 2016 14:44:38 +0200 > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: [...] >> Andy Patterson skribis: >> >> > +(define* (package-with-build-system from-build-system >> > to-build-system >> > +from-prefix to-prefix >

Re: [PATCH 02/12] gnu: Add alexandria.

2016-10-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Andy Patterson skribis: > * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (alexandria, alexandria-sbcl, alexandria-ecl): > New variables. [...] > +(define-public alexandria > + (let ((revision "1") > +(commit "926a066611b7b11cb71e26c827a271e500888c30")) > +(package > + (name "alexandria") > +

Re: [PATCH 03/12] gnu: Add fiveam.

2016-10-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Andy Patterson skribis: > * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (fiveam, fiveam-sbcl, fiveam-ecl): New > variables. LGTM. Something that maybe wasn’t discussed is the package naming convention. So far we usually prefix packages that provide libraries by the language or implementation name: “python-”, “emac

Re: [PATCH 10/12] gnu: Add slynk.

2016-10-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Andy Patterson skribis: > * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (slynk, slynk-sbcl, slynk-ecl): New variables. [...] > +(synopsis "Common Lisp IDE for Emacs") > +(description "SLY is a fork of SLIME. It also featrues a completely To make it more standalone, maybe something like: “SLY is a fork of S

Re: [PATCH 0/12]: Add asdf-build-system.

2016-10-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
I browsed the patch series quickly; the packages I did not comment on LGTM, modulo the question of whether we should prefix them. Thanks! Ludo’.

Re: [PATCH 0/12]: Add asdf-build-system.

2016-10-08 Thread 宋文武
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > I browsed the patch series quickly; the packages I did not comment on > LGTM, modulo the question of whether we should prefix them. > Thanks for the review! I push them :-) (the V2 patches already use prefix names.)

Re: [PATCH v2 00/13]: Add asdf-build-system.

2016-10-08 Thread 宋文武
All applied, thanks! The `sbcl-stumpwm-with-slynk' package ends up with a 'stumpwm-exec.fasl' file, so I remove it manually.

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Update Sphinx to 1.4.6

2016-10-08 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Hi Danny, thanks for the updated patchs. I still have some remarks. Maybe I'm nitpicking, sorry. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gnu: Add python-snowballstemmer.

2016-10-08 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Hi Danny, > +(synopsis > + "16 stemmer algorithms (15 + Poerter English stemmer)") > +(description > + "This package provides 16 stemmer algorithms (15 + Poerter English > +stemmer) generated from Snowball algorithms.") Sorry for not adding this comment the first time. For me thi

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] gnu: Add python-imagesize.

2016-10-08 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Am 07.10.2016 um 17:13 schrieb Danny Milosavljevic: > +(synopsis > + "Gets image size of files in variaous formats in Python") "sizes" (there are two of them: width and hight. Sorry for nitpicking :-) -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] gnu: Update Sphinx to 1.4.6.

2016-10-08 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Am 07.10.2016 um 17:13 schrieb Danny Milosavljevic: > +(native-inputs > + `(("python-simplejson" ,python-simplejson))) Isn't node missing now? And If I read the setup.py coerrectly, this is only required for PyPy: 'simplejson', # better:'test:platform_python_implementation=="PyP

Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc

2016-10-08 Thread ng0
David Craven writes: >> I was wondering what happened to musl? Are there any problems left, >> anything the people you have been working with can help you to solve? I >> had the impression it was almost ready. > > Depends on what you consider ready. It's ready for creating a gcc6 > musl toolchain

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] gnu: Update Sphinx to 1.4.6.

2016-10-08 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
On Sat, 8 Oct 2016 15:31:46 +0200 Hartmut Goebel wrote: > Am 07.10.2016 um 17:13 schrieb Danny Milosavljevic: > > +(native-inputs > > + `(("python-simplejson" ,python-simplejson))) > > Isn't node missing now? I don't know. I always test the stuff before sending - and it works. Should

Re: [PATCH] gnu: lynx: Fix GnuTLS support.

2016-10-08 Thread ng0
Hi, Kei I think you need to consider packaging one of the "pre" versions of lynx. I understand we are fixed on packaging this with gnutls, so if you read the changelog of the recent pre versions releases, you will discover that there was work on gnutls support. If you don't want to package pre ver

Re: locales gone

2016-10-08 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi Ludo, On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 14:39:00 +0200 l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > > > so I've updated to 947a5d47a50252cb0b87b78a8f83f274dec593e2 git guix and > > now I don't have any useful locales. > > > > $ locale -a > > C > > POSIX > > I think this has al

Re: Contents of /etc/hosts

2016-10-08 Thread John Darrington
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 11:24:57AM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: Am 05.10.2016 um 20:31 schrieb John Darrington: > (shepherd-service-type >'host-name >(lambda (name) > (shepherd-service I suggest adding a comment here whether this is the bare hostna

Re: Contents of /etc/hosts

2016-10-08 Thread John Darrington
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:07:37PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: Am 06.10.2016 um 02:57 schrieb John Darrington: >127.0.0.1 localhost >::1 localhost >127.0.0.1 gambrinus >::1 gambrinus > > Or am I missing somet

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add FPGA Tools

2016-10-08 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
For the record, this patchset is still good and nothing has to be manually adjusted. Ludo said: >> (lambda _ >> (substitute* "iceprog/Makefile" >> (("-L/usr/local/lib") "") >> (("-I/usr/local/include") "" >This is unnecessary unless you’re running “guix-daemon >--disable-chroot”,

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] gnu: Update Sphinx to 1.4.6.

2016-10-08 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Am 08.10.2016 um 15:56 schrieb Danny Milosavljevic: >>> > > +(native-inputs >>> > > + `(("python-simplejson" ,python-simplejson))) >> > >> > Isn't node missing now? > I don't know. I always test the stuff before sending - and it works. Should > node be there? Sorry, I meant "nose" (I'm

Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc

2016-10-08 Thread David Craven
I assume you didn't search for define-public musl in the guix source tree? It's in gnu/packages/musl.scm

Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc

2016-10-08 Thread ng0
David Craven writes: > I assume you didn't search for define-public musl in the guix source > tree? It's in gnu/packages/musl.scm ha! okay, i think I had a very old branch when I searched... thanks for clearing that up. --

Re: [PATCH] gnu: lynx: Fix GnuTLS support.

2016-10-08 Thread Kei Kebreau
ng0 writes: > Hi, > > Kei I think you need to consider packaging one of the "pre" versions of > lynx. I understand we are fixed on packaging this with gnutls, so if you > read the changelog of the recent pre versions releases, you will > discover that there was work on gnutls support. If you don'

Re: WIP pypy3.3 - tests still fail? Anyone see why?

2016-10-08 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
> Also if guix build does fail executing some test - can I continue there > somehow? Uhhh... I mean: if a test fails, can I make guix open a shell there (with all the right environment etc) so I can examine what's up, let me fix it and then restart the phase?

Re: Remove geiser-next after updating geiser?

2016-10-08 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-10-07 14:48 +0200) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> From 5424f4945801dfdd9083a4985bf77b3ebef90b90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Alex Kost >> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:01:07 +0300 >> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: geiser: Update to 0.9. >> >> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (geiser):

OpenBLAS

2016-10-08 Thread Federico Beffa
Hi, I'm wondering why our OpenBLAS package is built with the flag "NO_LAPACK=1". It is my understanding that with this optional flag OpenBLAS doesn't include LAPACK, while without this flag and by default it does include the LAPACK functions. In the latter case OpenBLAS could be used by a larger

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 09:17:30PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Hi Guix, > > our build of the “texmaker” package is broken ever since we disabled the > webkit module of our Qt package. I’m currently looking into packaging > up the needed Qt modules, but the obvious question remains: do we want

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Efraim Flashner writes: > AFAIK Chromium doesn't modify any of its bundled software. Would it make > sense to create a chromium-source package that replaces the bundled > sources with our sources, allowing us to keep the chromium source and > the bundled source up-to-date. Then we could use this

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:00:29PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Efraim Flashner writes: > > > AFAIK Chromium doesn't modify any of its bundled software. Would it make > > sense to create a chromium-source package that replaces the bundled > > sources with our sources, allowing us to keep the

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread ng0
Efraim Flashner writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:00:29PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> >> Efraim Flashner writes: >> >> > AFAIK Chromium doesn't modify any of its bundled software. Would it make >> > sense to create a chromium-source package that replaces t

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 00:08:50 +0300 Efraim Flashner wrote: > I'm not sure, but I assumed it was so that anyone could download the > source and run './configure; make; (sudo) make install' without worrying > about those pesky things known as dependancies. That's certainly why I bundle. Also that the

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread Roel Janssen
Ricardo Wurmus writes: > David Craven writes: > >>> What do you think? The alternative is to drop Texmaker and all the >>> other packages that depend on Chromium as distributed by Qt. >> >> Weren't you vocal on IRC about bundling and the hell it brings? Sounds >> like bundling is ok when it sui

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Roel Janssen writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> David Craven writes: >> What do you think? The alternative is to drop Texmaker and all the other packages that depend on Chromium as distributed by Qt. >>> >>> Weren't you vocal on IRC about bundling and the hell it brings? Sounds >>

Re: [PATCH] gnu: lynx: Fix GnuTLS support.

2016-10-08 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 10:42:38AM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: > I get the same problem here. Lynx does mention that GnuTLS support is > experimental. Your and Tobias' page work using OpenSSL instead. Try the > new patch attached. > From ee3a889e6902686de4d7c949afcb8cd4a810bd0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
On Sat, 08 Oct 2016 23:35:53 +0200 Roel Janssen wrote: > Ouch. I was the one who submitted the package when the Qt modules > weren't unbundled yet (I guess). Ah. There are two calls QDesktopServices::openUrl commented out. You can put them back in and remove the instantiations of the Browser c

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add gnome-clocks.

2016-10-08 Thread rennes
Hello, Could you send an updated patch? Hello, I found a problem with one of the functions of the application related to gnome-shell and geoclue. I will continue conducting tests. Thank you.

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Make "guix-devel" a public variable in package-management.scm

2016-10-08 Thread Chris Marusich
Hi, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi, > > Chris Marusich skribis: > >> Here's a patch to address the following issue ('guix environment guix >> doesn't provide guix dependencies'): >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg02118.html > > Thanks for looking into it

Re: [PATCH (3)] gnu: Add NFS related services (moved idmap.conf out of /etc, added texinfo markup to documentation, s/dir/directory)

2016-10-08 Thread John Darrington
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:49:36PM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote: Hi! > +The RPC Bind service provides a facility to map program numbers into s/program numbers/ONC@tie{}RPC program numbers/ > +universal addresses. ???IP addresses No. These are

Re: Patches to implement system roll-back and switch-generation

2016-10-08 Thread Chris Marusich
Hi, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi! > > Chris Marusich skribis: > >> I believe my patch does NOT yet make the regenerated grub.cfg a GC root, >> so it is possible that after rolling back or switching generations, >> invoking GC might clean up some things you'd rather keep around (li

Re: [PATCH] gnu: guile-next: Increase timeout.

2016-10-08 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 10:00:44AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-next)[properties]: Set timeout to > 20 hours. Seems fine if that's how long it takes. Wow!

Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

2016-10-08 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:18:55AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Roel Janssen writes: > > Also, I know that Calibre is broken (it compiles file, but it doesn't > > start anymore) since we are missing the QtWebKit module. > > Yet another package for which we would need to decide: remove the >

Re: WIP pypy3.3 - tests still fail? Anyone see why?

2016-10-08 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 07:27:08PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > > Also if guix build does fail executing some test - can I continue there > > somehow? > > Uhhh... I mean: if a test fails, can I make guix open a shell there (with all > the right environment etc) so I can examine what's up,