Ricardo Wurmus writes: > David Craven <da...@craven.ch> writes: > >>> What do you think? The alternative is to drop Texmaker and all the >>> other packages that depend on Chromium as distributed by Qt. >> >> Weren't you vocal on IRC about bundling and the hell it brings? Sounds >> like bundling is ok when it suits you... :) > > I have no problems dropping Texmaker. I’m not even using it.
Ouch. I was the one who submitted the package when the Qt modules weren't unbundled yet (I guess). Now, because of a change of how we package Qt, we're ready to remove a program that used to work just fine..? What's next? Throw the calibre package out of the window too because it's broken for GNU Guix users? Kind regards, Roel Janssen