Ricardo Wurmus writes:

> David Craven <da...@craven.ch> writes:
>
>>> What do you think?  The alternative is to drop Texmaker and all the
>>> other packages that depend on Chromium as distributed by Qt.
>>
>> Weren't you vocal on IRC about bundling and the hell it brings? Sounds
>> like bundling is ok when it suits you... :)
>
> I have no problems dropping Texmaker.  I’m not even using it.

Ouch.  I was the one who submitted the package when the Qt modules
weren't unbundled yet (I guess).  Now, because of a change of how we
package Qt, we're ready to remove a program that used to work just
fine..?

What's next?  Throw the calibre package out of the window too because
it's broken for GNU Guix users?

Kind regards,
Roel Janssen

Reply via email to