Roel Janssen <r...@gnu.org> writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: >> What do you think? The alternative is to drop Texmaker and all the >> other packages that depend on Chromium as distributed by Qt. > > I'm not super familiar with Qt modules anymore, but can't we just > package the QtWebKit module? How does QtWebEngine relate to QtWebKit?
I’m not familiar with this myself, but QtWebEngine is needed to build QtWebView. (There is no downloadable QtWebKit submodule.) > Also, I know that Calibre is broken (it compiles file, but it doesn't > start anymore) since we are missing the QtWebKit module. Yet another package for which we would need to decide: remove the package or add “qtwebengine”. ~~ Ricardo
