Ludovic Courtès (2016-10-07 14:48 +0200) wrote:

> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> From 5424f4945801dfdd9083a4985bf77b3ebef90b90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:01:07 +0300
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: geiser: Update to 0.9.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (geiser): Update to 0.9.
>
> Yeah!
>
>> From a188e5e12ac666f46c659c3e4330c7ec207b5557 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:01:30 +0300
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: geiser-next: Remove.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (geiser-next): Remove.
>
> To be safe, I’d make it:
>
>   (define-public geiser-next
>     ;; This has become “geiser”.
>     (deprecated-package "geiser-next" geiser))
>
> That way ‘guix package -u’ will DTRT.

Done, thanks!

-- 
Alex

Reply via email to