Ludovic Courtès (2016-10-07 14:48 +0200) wrote: > Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis: > >> From 5424f4945801dfdd9083a4985bf77b3ebef90b90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> >> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:01:07 +0300 >> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: geiser: Update to 0.9. >> >> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (geiser): Update to 0.9. > > Yeah! > >> From a188e5e12ac666f46c659c3e4330c7ec207b5557 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> >> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:01:30 +0300 >> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: geiser-next: Remove. >> >> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (geiser-next): Remove. > > To be safe, I’d make it: > > (define-public geiser-next > ;; This has become “geiser”. > (deprecated-package "geiser-next" geiser)) > > That way ‘guix package -u’ will DTRT.
Done, thanks! -- Alex