Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-07-24 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 10:56:05PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > > > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:56:58PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > [...] > > >>> Anyway, this patch is just about how we name the command. That the

Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-07-24 Thread Ludovic Courtès
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > Leo Famulari skribis: > >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:56:58PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: [...] >>> Anyway, this patch is just about how we name the command. That the >>> command is called ‘gpg2’ is a well-known annoyance, and Werner >>> recommends n

Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-06-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Leo Famulari skribis: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:56:58PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Leo Famulari skribis: >> >> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:53:00PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> >> Why not just drop gpg-2.0 then? >> > >> > All three GnuPG branches (1.4, 2.0, 2.1) are a

Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-06-17 Thread Leo Famulari
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:56:58PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:53:00PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > > [...] > > >> Why not just drop gpg-2.0 then? > > > > All three GnuPG branches (1.4, 2.0, 2.1) are actively maintained. Why > > drop 2.

Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-06-16 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Leo Famulari skribis: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:53:00PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: [...] >> Why not just drop gpg-2.0 then? > > All three GnuPG branches (1.4, 2.0, 2.1) are actively maintained. Why > drop 2.0? +1 Besides, I use 2.0, because for some reason 2.1 has always failed for me (tho

Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-06-15 Thread Andreas Enge
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:02:58AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > All three GnuPG branches (1.4, 2.0, 2.1) are actively maintained. Why > drop 2.0? If we start "deprecating" gnupg-1 by calling the gnupg-2 binary "gpg" instead of "gpg2", then we may as well drop the middle branch. Everything else wou

Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-06-15 Thread Leo Famulari
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:53:00PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 09:50:01AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 02:09:41PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > > > > > There was discussion of installing the gnupg-2.1 binaries 'g

Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-06-15 Thread Andreas Enge
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 09:50:01AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 02:09:41PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > > > There was discussion of installing the gnupg-2.1 binaries 'gpg2' and > > > 'gpgv2' as 'gpg' and 'gpgv' on the 'Trustable guix pull'

Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-06-14 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 02:09:41PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > There was discussion of installing the gnupg-2.1 binaries 'gpg2' and > > 'gpgv2' as 'gpg' and 'gpgv' on the 'Trustable guix pull' thread [0]. [...] > > The configuration option does not exist for gnu

Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-06-14 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:49:42PM +, ng0 wrote: > gnupg-2.0 and gnupg-2.1 are currently individual packages which can be > installed side by side in guix? They are different packages but I assume they cannot be installed together since they both have the 'gpg2' and 'gpg2v' binaries and man pa

Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-06-14 Thread ng0
On 2016-06-14(09:52:46AM+0200), Andreas Enge wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 05:07:08PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:24:23PM +, ng0 wrote: > > > What if we patched gpg-1 to not colide with gpg-2? > > > > > > For example, move gpg and gpgv and man pages o

Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-06-14 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Leo Famulari skribis: > There was discussion of installing the gnupg-2.1 binaries 'gpg2' and > 'gpgv2' as 'gpg' and 'gpgv' on the 'Trustable guix pull' thread [0]. > > If we do this, it will become impossible to install gnupg-1 and > gnupg-2.1 in the same profile, due to collisions of 'gpg' and

Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-06-14 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Andreas Enge skribis: > By the way, should we maybe make pinentry a propagated input of gnupg-2.1? > If I understand correctly, gnupg-2.1 will not work without it (and mixing > pinentry from Debian with gnupg-2.1 from Guix was one of the reasons for > gnupg not working at first). I don’t th

Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-06-14 Thread Andreas Enge
Hello, On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 05:07:08PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:24:23PM +, ng0 wrote: > > What if we patched gpg-1 to not colide with gpg-2? > > > > For example, move gpg and gpgv and man pages of them > > for gpg-1 to something which has -1 in its name. > >

Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-06-13 Thread Christopher Allan Webber
Leo Famulari writes: > There was discussion of installing the gnupg-2.1 binaries 'gpg2' and > 'gpgv2' as 'gpg' and 'gpgv' on the 'Trustable guix pull' thread [0]. > > If we do this, it will become impossible to install gnupg-1 and > gnupg-2.1 in the same profile, due to collisions of 'gpg' and '

Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-06-13 Thread Leo Famulari
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:24:23PM +, ng0 wrote: > What if we patched gpg-1 to not colide with gpg-2? > > For example, move gpg and gpgv and man pages of them > for gpg-1 to something which has -1 in its name. > On the other hand this would have to be consistent and be followed > straigth to n

Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

2016-06-13 Thread ng0
On 2016-06-13(03:55:38-0400), Leo Famulari wrote: > There was discussion of installing the gnupg-2.1 binaries 'gpg2' and > 'gpgv2' as 'gpg' and 'gpgv' on the 'Trustable guix pull' thread [0]. > > If we do this, it will become impossible to install gnupg-1 and > gnupg-2.1 in the same profile, due to