On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:02:58AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > All three GnuPG branches (1.4, 2.0, 2.1) are actively maintained. Why > drop 2.0?
If we start "deprecating" gnupg-1 by calling the gnupg-2 binary "gpg" instead of "gpg2", then we may as well drop the middle branch. Everything else would be somewhat confusing, and I do not think we should burden ourselves with going down the route of patching gnupg-2.0, so that it behaves like gnupg-2.1 in that its binaries look as if they were from gnupg-1 ;-) Moreover, practically speaking, my impression was that for its ease of use, there was a point in keeping gnupg-1, why there was less reason for sticking with 2.0 instead of 2.1. Andreas
