On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:24:23PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > What if we patched gpg-1 to not colide with gpg-2? > > For example, move gpg and gpgv and man pages of them > for gpg-1 to something which has -1 in its name. > On the other hand this would have to be consistent and be followed > straigth to not colide again. I'm not sure if this > approach will work out in the long run.
Unless this is a configuration option supported by upstream GnuPG, I don't want to do that. For the same reason, my patch does not affect gnupg-2.0.
