l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis: > >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:56:58PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...] >>> Anyway, this patch is just about how we name the command. That the >>> command is called ‘gpg2’ is a well-known annoyance, and Werner >>> recommends not doing that anyway. >> >> Is there a consensus on the way forward? Should we apply this patch to >> gnupg-2.1? > > To me it seems the answer is “yes”. If you want to be sure, please > leave another couple of days before pushing. :-) > >> Is anyone willing to test and maintain patches against gnupg-2.0 (not >> me)? I finally did that in commit bc85b127df622575988f8e760f72d608d0900a75. Now, gnupg@2.0 provides the ‘gpg’ and ‘gpgv’ commands, in addition to ‘gpg2’ and ‘gpgv2’ (to ease transition). Update your aliases and workarounds! Ludo’.
