Hi,
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> All good, I had a look at the discussion and I'll study the patch a bit
> more.
>
> Today I learnt that Nix also had tried the same thing some 2 years
> back. And they ran into scalability issues. Maybe we should ask the
> Nix folks. Does anyone know more detai
Hello!
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> Update: I've been asked if I wanted to conduct a "Deep dive"
> (https://github.com/ipfs/camp/blob/master/DEEP_DIVES/README.md) about
> IPFS and Guix. In other words: what problem we've encountered, how to
> solve them, what we'd like to do.
Neat.
> I think i
Update: I've been asked if I wanted to conduct a "Deep dive"
(https://github.com/ipfs/camp/blob/master/DEEP_DIVES/README.md) about
IPFS and Guix. In other words: what problem we've encountered, how to
solve them, what we'd like to do.
I think it would be a good time to discuss a work out bug
3389
Pierre Neidhardt transcribed 1.7K bytes:
> Thank you all for your comments!
>
> > That sounds like a great opportunity. Guix and IPFS are in my humble
> > opinion two of the most interesting ongoing projects in the computing
> > world.. Bringing the two together can only make this better.
>
> My
Konrad Hinsen skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> (They could have chosen Guile instead of a custom Lisp, but that’s an
>> “implementation detail”. :-))
>
> From my reading of the whitepaper, no. They have pretty strict
> constraints on their language because they send live code updates
> t
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> (They could have chosen Guile instead of a custom Lisp, but that’s an
> “implementation detail”. :-))
>From my reading of the whitepaper, no. They have pretty strict
constraints on their language because they send live code updates
to running instances and want to be a
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hey!
>
> I stumbled upon this:
>
> https://github.com/ipfs/package-managers#readme
And I just stumbled on this one:
https://github.com/ipfs/roadmap
Quote:
2019 Priority
We will be focusing our efforts into a single (lazer focus)
priority. 📦 Package Man
Hi!
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> Konrad Hinsen writes:
[...]
>> For human input, Git would be OK, with repositories stored in IPFS
>> (there's already some support for that, see
>> https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipld-git). A more radical redesign is
>> Radicle (http://www.radicle.xyz/), which uses
Hey!
I stumbled upon this:
https://github.com/ipfs/package-managers#readme
Hopefully that’s something you’ll discuss at IPFS Camp!
Ludo’.
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
>> I was thinking of the Guix package definitions. In the long run,
>> assuming IPFS turns out to be reliable enough, we could put all source
>> into IPFS with a CID reference, rather then today's many ways to
>> download source files.
>
> There would be nothing special a
Konrad Hinsen writes:
> I was thinking of the Guix package definitions. In the long run,
> assuming IPFS turns out to be reliable enough, we could put all source
> into IPFS with a CID reference, rather then today's many ways to
> download source files.
There would be nothing special about it be
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
>> - A unified way to refer to stuff (I am thinking of IPLD here)
>> No more tarballs, git commits, etc. CIDs everywhere.
>
> Do you have a concrete use case?
I was thinking of the Guix package definitions. In the long run,
assuming IPFS turns out to
Am 03.06.19 um 18:19 schrieb Pronaip:
- All data comes with provenance tracking:
- computations are tracked via Guix
- human input is logged (interactivity) or version controlled
unless you vision of the distant future somehow also includes most social
problems having been sol
Hi, not to rain on the parade, but
> - All data lives in IPFS: no local filesystem, no Guix store.
> A personal computing device only stores references to information
> that its owner cares about.
>
> - All computations are equal: no distinction between "software builds"
> and ever
Hi Pierre,
> I'm going to the IPFS camp (https://camp.ipfs.io/) on June 27th and I've
> been asked to give a (5 minute) lightning talk about IPFS & Guix. Yaik! :)
That sounds like a great opportunity. Guix and IPFS are in my humble
opinion two of the most interesting ongoing projects in the comp
Hi Pierre,
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> I'm going to the IPFS camp (https://camp.ipfs.io/) on June 27th and I've
> been asked to give a (5 minute) lightning talk about IPFS & Guix. Yaik! :)
Excellent, I’m sure you’re going to have a great time!
> I'll have to prepare some slides (probably in O
16 matches
Mail list logo
