Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> writes: >> I was thinking of the Guix package definitions. In the long run, >> assuming IPFS turns out to be reliable enough, we could put all source >> into IPFS with a CID reference, rather then today's many ways to >> download source files. > > There would be nothing special about it beside implementing an IPFS > fetcher, or would it? Let me know if I misunderstood.
What's special about it is that it could replace all the other ones. > Didn't know Radicle, it looks fantabulous! And... it uses (or plans to) > a Scheme-based language! :) Exactly. > So you are saying that we could move the guix.git to a Radicle project, > right? Yes, assuming all that becomes stable at some point. Konrad.
