Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > (They could have chosen Guile instead of a custom Lisp, but that’s an > “implementation detail”. :-))
>From my reading of the whitepaper, no. They have pretty strict constraints on their language because they send live code updates to running instances and want to be able to make certain guarantees. Guile, or any other Scheme, would be too flexible. Konrad.
