Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hin...@fastmail.net> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > >> (They could have chosen Guile instead of a custom Lisp, but that’s an >> “implementation detail”. :-)) > > From my reading of the whitepaper, no. They have pretty strict > constraints on their language because they send live code updates > to running instances and want to be able to make certain guarantees. > Guile, or any other Scheme, would be too flexible.
Oh right, I had overlooked that aspect of the project. Interesting! Ludo’.
