David Pirotte writes:
> prefixed by 'guile-', and i see this has been adopted, many thanks:
>
> https://packages.guix.gnu.org/search/?query=g-golf
> =>
> g-golf 0.8.0-rc9
>
> But I see it still has:
>
> guile-g-golf 0.8.0-rc9
Well, g-golf is deprecated by guile-g-golf her
Hello Guix,
Completing my previous sent email about G-Golf packages
in Guix
I did ask, a long time ago, that G-Golf pkg(s) name(s) would not be
prefixed by 'guile-', and i see this has been adopted, many thanks:
https://packages.guix.gnu.org/search/?query=g-golf
=
Hello Guix,
Wrt packaging g-golf in guix, please allow me to suggest to adopt this
approach, which is what debian does, and I recently convinced the nix
pkg maintainer to also 'do the same'.
I highly recommend that you split and propose (for now) 3 pkgs:
g-golf
g-golf-gtk-4-exam
Am 08.02.25 um 17:33 schrieb Ian Eure:
But I think problems need to be acknowledged, so these are some of my
observations about them.
I really like this summary, which matches my observations.
@Ludo: Maybe include these points into the GCD?
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel
Am 08.02.25 um 17:33 schrieb Ian Eure:
But I think problems need to be acknowledged, so these are some of my
observations about them.
--
Schönen Gruß
Hartmut Goebel
Dipl.-Informatiker (univ), CISSP, CSSLP, ISO 27001 Lead Implementer
Information Security Management, Security Governance, Secure
Am 10.02.25 um 21:38 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
I support it as well¹ but I think we’d rather address it separately.
I'm in favor of changing the name of the main branch in one go when
switching to Codeberg.
Rational: People need to touch their setup anyway (AFAIU).
¹ I started looking at it
Am 10.02.25 um 16:13 schrieb Tomas Volf:
In my experience any non-trivial amount of discussion becomes hard to
follow due to the lack of threading and limited tooling the Web UI
provides. Dunno, maybe I am just doing GitHub wrong.
I just checked in Codeberg/Fojero: Unfortuately it does not sup
Hi Gábor,
Gábor Boskovits skribis:
> Ludo's FOSDEM talk inspired me to share some thoughts that I encountered
> during my time at my previous position where we designed an init system.
Oh!
> The fist things are the specialities of the pid 1 processes:
> - they own the pid namespace where they
Hello,
Juliana Sims skribis:
> For those not at Guix Days:
>
> We have split into groups discussing various topics. Each group is
> collecting notes on its discussion. I am starting this thread as a
> place for these notes, to be distributed as necessary.
Great initiative. To those who took
Hi,
Ian Eure skribis:
> Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
>
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>>> That way, pushes to `master` will be limited to changes that have
>>> already been validated and built.
>> Perhaps we should rename 'master' to something else too. Food for
>> thought for a future GCD :)
>
> I support t
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'shepherd' has been submitted
by the Slovak team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/shepherd/sk.po
(We can arrange things so tha
On Sunday, 9 February 2025 02:20:16 CET pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> Hi. Andrej’s feedback is good; thank you both. However:
>
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
> >> There are several msgids which need to take advantage of the multiple
> >> plural>>
> >> support of gettext:
> >> - "service na
Andreas Enge skribis:
> Am Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 05:43:20PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> I gave the example of Nixpkgs, where package maintainers, who are not
>> necessarily committers, can trigger merges for some changes that touch
>> their packages and that pass a number of tests.
>
> Maybe
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for the clarification. If this is the case, and texlive is unlikely to
be used as a native input, it seems reasonable to me that setting
`allowSubstitutes = 0` if `(not (and substitutable? (every
substitutable-derivation? inputs)))` would entirely eliminate the possibility
o
Hi Maxime,
On Sun, Feb 09 2025, Maxime Devos wrote:
> It _is_ on track. I replied to someone making a negative remark about
> my behaviour, and defended myself.
> If defending oneself is a form of 'off track', then 'off track' is a
> good thing to do.
> Sometimes, being dismissive, is a perfect
Ian Eure writes:
> Hi 45mg,
>
> 45mg <45mg.wri...@gmail.com> writes:
>
There are many possible consequences of this. One is that GCDs like this
one would be seen by fewer people, so there would be less useful
discussion and feedback. And in general, people outside of a small
c
Maxime Devos writes:
> The incoherency is the problem. If you want ZFS, and your belief ok
> ZFS being legally OK is based on P being true, then it follows you
> have
>
> (a) ensure that P is true/rectify !P situations,
> (b) or give up on ZFS
> (c) (third alternative) or find another justific
Hi 45mg,
45mg <45mg.wri...@gmail.com> writes:
There are many possible consequences of this. One is that GCDs
like this
one would be seen by fewer people, so there would be less
useful
discussion and feedback. And in general, people outside of a
small
circle of old contributors already subscri
Hi Efraim,
Efraim Flashner writes:
On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 12:50:22PM -0800, Ian Eure wrote:
Hi all,
Vagrant Cascadian writes:
> When working with salsa.debian.org (a gitlab instance) there
> is a way to
> fetch all the merge requests for a given git repository, so
> it just
> becomes pa
Hello,
Am Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 10:42:26PM + schrieb Morgan Arnold via Development
of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.:
> It might be more correct to allow derivations built with non-substitutable
> native inputs to be substitutable nonetheless. The alternative seems like it
> could
On 9/02/2025 23:42, Morgan Arnold wrote:
Hi all,
As a bit of an aside, I'm wondering if it wouldn't be possible to eliminate the
possibility of even potential copyviols by a change to the `derivation`
function? It currently sets environment variable for the builder daemon by
setting `allowSu
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:59:46AM +0100, dan...@friendly-machines.com wrote:
> Hi Ludo,
>
> > Could you please either revert this commit or merge the two 'dlib'
> > definitions, assuming the upgrade does not break any dependent? (You
> > can use 'guix build -P1 dlib' for example to check that.)
On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 12:50:22PM -0800, Ian Eure wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Vagrant Cascadian writes:
>
> > When working with salsa.debian.org (a gitlab instance) there is a way to
> > fetch all the merge requests for a given git repository, so it just
> > becomes part of my normal workflow and to s
Hi,
On Sun Feb 9, 2025 at 9:49 AM CET, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote:
> I've added go-git-sr-ht-rjarry-go-opt-v2 variant to master.
Thanks!
I’ll send the patch for Aerc later this week.
--
Tanguy
Hi,
On Sun Feb 9, 2025 at 1:59 AM CET, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Right. In Go, the versioned URLs constitute an API break. Effectively a
> new package. Basically, Go uses URLs as canonical package names
> throughout the entire ecosystem, from fetching from the internet,
> building, and referring to a
25 matches
Mail list logo
