Ian Eure <i...@retrospec.tv> writes: > Hi 45mg, > > 45mg <45mg.wri...@gmail.com> writes: > >>>> There are many possible consequences of this. One is that GCDs like this >>>> one would be seen by fewer people, so there would be less useful >>>> discussion and feedback. And in general, people outside of a small >>>> circle of old contributors already subscribed to the lists will not >>>> participate in, or even be aware of, core community discussions. >> >> So, I do feel that this is necessary to discuss, as one of the likely >> drawbacks (or opportunities!) presented by this GCD. > > I’ve had good success in professional settings with a PR workflow for this > kind > of thing. If you have a repo with the GCDs, new ones can be added with a PR > to > the repo, and discussion can take place by leaving comments on it.
In my experience any non-trivial amount of discussion becomes hard to follow due to the lack of threading and limited tooling the Web UI provides. Dunno, maybe I am just doing GitHub wrong. On the other hand, it can hardly be worse than Confluence. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Tomas -- There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
