On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 05:54:26PM -0800, walt wrote:
>
> Heh. I'm assuming an .rmk file involves ruby somehow? The bonehead
> build process that I'm using doesn't turn an .rmk into a .mk AFAICT,
> but I'd like to know how to do it.
Try ./autogen.sh
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 01:24:57PM -0800, walt wrote:
>>
>> Yes! I just discovered that I can multiboot the netbsd kernel off
>> of a FAT32 fs or even an NTFS fs, but *not* off of a UFS fs :o/
>>
>> Apparently "something bad" happens to the kernel in
"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 25 January 2008 09:56, Marco Gerards wrote:
>> "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > On Thursday 24 January 2008 13:39, Robert Millan wrote:
>> >> So perhaps it's a good idea to release 1.96 with known regressions after
>
Dean Loros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> I've been following the list (sort-of) for some time now & I have
> several questions--
>
> 1. Is Grub2 up to the usability of Grub?
If it isn't, please report so. We are close to having something
stable. Bug reports can help us a lot.
> 2. I've be
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Robert,
> Reporting current status of GRUB on XO:
>
> - Missing some parts of AT keyboard driver (arrows don't work).
Is this a general issue with your driver? For arrow keys you need to
process multiple scancodes, IIRC.
> - Can only access SD c
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 10:25:32PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> I'm concerned about your latest commit:
>
> * kern/powerpc/ieee1275/init.c (grub_arch_modules_addr): Skip
> `GRUB_MOD_GAP' for platforms in which it's not defined.
>
> The algorithm for calculating the
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:52:10AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> >
> > - Missing some parts of AT keyboard driver (arrows don't work).
>
> Is this a general issue with your driver? For arrow keys you need to
> process multiple scancodes, IIRC.
Yes. Other keys that are composed in the same way
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 04:10:42AM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > > >
> > > > How FreeBSD-specific is this? Will the same module apply to other a.out
> > > > binaries ? (I ask since you gave it a generic name)
> > >
> > > it's an old format of the unix system:
> > >
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.o
On Jan 27, 2008 2:15 AM, Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2008 1:21 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > FreeBSD:
> > >
> > > lnxboot.S: Assembler messages:
> > > lnxboot.S:49: Error: `0x200+data_start - data_next(%ebx,%eax)' is not a
> > > valid 16 bit base/index expressi
On Jan 28, 2008 9:54 AM, walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 04:25 +0800, Bean wrote:
> ...
> > > > please make a small ufs image containing the netbsd kernel, i don't a
> > > > a bsd system at hand
>
> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~wa1ter/ufs.gz
>
> I included a small text fi
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 10:09:10AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Also, I don't see how GRUB_MOD_GAP would not be defined to 0x8000 for
> > i386-ieee1275 platform considering that
> > include/grub/i386/ieee1275/kernel.h simply includes
> > include/grub/powerpc/ieee1275/kernel.h
>
> Sounds strange
On Jan 28, 2008 4:57 PM, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 01:24:57PM -0800, walt wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes! I just discovered that I can multiboot the netbsd kernel off
> >> of a FAT32 fs or even an NTFS fs, but *not* off
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:06:51PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>
> grub-probe is nice, but i normally use grub-fstest to debug fs
> problem, because it have more options.
Ah, I noticed grub-fstest is not in CVS yet. I'll comment on your patch now..
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone c
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:11:21PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> diff --git a/conf/i386-pc.rmk b/conf/i386-pc.rmk
> index 2638ee5..a25dd76 100644
> --- a/conf/i386-pc.rmk
> +++ b/conf/i386-pc.rmk
> @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ sbin_UTILITIES = grub-setup grub-mkdevicemap grub-probe
> ifeq ($(enable_grub_emu), yes)
>
> > - movsbl %dh, %eax
> > - movl%eax, %ss:(DATA_ADDR + GRUB_KERNEL_MACHINE_INSTALL_DOS_PART)
> > + // Check for the multiboot signature
> > + cmpl$0x1badb002, %ss:(DATA_ADDR + 0x50)
> > + jz 1f
> [...]
>
> if there is no objection, I'd like to check in
On Jan 28, 2008 6:47 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > - movsbl %dh, %eax
> > > - movl%eax, %ss:(DATA_ADDR +
> > > GRUB_KERNEL_MACHINE_INSTALL_DOS_PART)
> > > + // Check for the multiboot signature
> > > + cmpl$0x1badb002, %ss:(DATA_ADDR + 0x50)
>
On Jan 28, 2008 5:11 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 04:10:42AM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > How FreeBSD-specific is this? Will the same module apply to other
> > > > > a.out
> > > > > binaries ? (I ask since you gave it a generic name)
> > > >
>
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > - movsbl %dh, %eax
>> > - movl%eax, %ss:(DATA_ADDR +
>> > GRUB_KERNEL_MACHINE_INSTALL_DOS_PART)
>> > + // Check for the multiboot signature
>> > + cmpl$0x1badb002, %ss:(DATA_ADDR + 0x50)
>> > + jz 1f
>> [..
On Jan 28, 2008 9:00 PM, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Jan 28, 2008 9:54 AM, walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 04:25 +0800, Bean wrote:
> >> ...
> >> > > > please make a small ufs image containing the netbsd kernel
Hi,
Here is a patch that allows you to iterate over PCI devices. The file
pci.c adds a function to iterate over the devices and a function to
generate an address to query the PCI device. Furthermore, there is a
function to actually access the hardware, which is machine specific.
I only implement
On Jan 28, 2008 10:37 PM, walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 19:48 +0800, Bean wrote:
> > On Jan 28, 2008 5:11 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 04:10:42AM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How FreeBSD-specific is this? W
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 19:48 +0800, Bean wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2008 5:11 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 04:10:42AM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How FreeBSD-specific is this? Will the same module apply to other
> > > > > > a.out
> > > > > > bin
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:30 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 10:09:10AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Also, I don't see how GRUB_MOD_GAP would not be defined to 0x8000 for
> > > i386-ieee1275 platform considering that
> > > include/grub/i386/ieee1275/kernel.h simply include
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 10:48:13PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE 1
> +#include
I suspect this wouldn't work in practice, because any system header can
drag in.
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 03:03:33PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
>
> I wanted to wait with this patch until the ATA driver is adapted. But
> I won't have time for that this week. So I can better get this
> committed and people working on this ;-). There is some code for ATA,
> but it was not test
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 03:03:33PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
>>
>> I wanted to wait with this patch until the ATA driver is adapted. But
>> I won't have time for that this week. So I can better get this
>> committed and people working on this ;-).
Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jan 28, 2008 9:54 AM, walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 04:25 +0800, Bean wrote:
>> ...
>> > > > please make a small ufs image containing the netbsd kernel, i don't a
>> > > > a bsd system at hand
>>
>> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~w
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 17:29 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:44:51AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > > What do you suggest?
> >
> > I would prefer to have GRUB_MOD_GAP is all headers. Once it's not
> > needed, it could be removed across the board.
>
> Ok, does this seem f
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:35:35AM +0800, Bean wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2008 1:27 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 10:48:13PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > > +#include
> > > +#include
> > > +#include
> > > +#include
> > > +
> > > +#define _GNU_SOURCE 1
> > > +#inclu
On Jan 28, 2008 6:45 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we move this to common.rmk ? AFAICT, there's nothing i386-pc-specific
> about
> this.
>
> As for the list of filesystems, please reuse the filesystem chunk used on
> other
> commands; this will improve readability, ensure t
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:34:07AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 17:29 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:44:51AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > > > What do you suggest?
> > >
> > > I would prefer to have GRUB_MOD_GAP is all headers. Once it's not
>
Hi Tristan!
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is the patch to add support for ia64. This is mostly new files
> (as well as new commands used to debug), and a few fixes in kern/efi/mm.c and
> fs/fat.c.
>
> Ia64 uses EFI so this port leverage on the
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:44:51AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > What do you suggest?
>
> I would prefer to have GRUB_MOD_GAP is all headers. Once it's not
> needed, it could be removed across the board.
Ok, does this seem fine?
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:32:33PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> > --- qemu-0.9.0+20070816/hw/pc.c~2007-06-06 18:26:13.0 +0200
> > +++ qemu-0.9.0+20070816/hw/pc.c 2008-01-28 18:25:00.0 +0100
> > @@ -676,6 +676,8 @@
> > qemu_irq *cpu_irq;
> > qemu_irq *i8259;
> >
>
On Jan 29, 2008 1:27 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 10:48:13PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +
> > +#define _GNU_SOURCE 1
> > +#include
>
> I suspect this wouldn't work in practice, because any system hea
Bean wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008 10:37 PM, walt<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
Good news and bad news. With this patch and your most recent ufs patch
I can aout /boot/loader or multiboot /netbsd from a UFS partition, that
is the good news.
The bad news is that when I type 'boot', /boot/loader prin
Hi,
I read in previous mails that eltorito support would be getting worked on
for the summer of code projects, and that it should be getting merged into
the grub2 codebase at somepoint.
Im just wondering what is the current situation with this? Is there any
timeline when it will be completed?
T
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 09:56:50AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 12:11:48PM -0800, walt wrote:
> > > What is the problem initially?
> >
> > kernel_img-kern_device.o: In function `grub_device_iterate':
> > ../kern/device.c:84: undefined reference to `__enable_execute_stack'
Hi,
extracted from my IA64 patch.
Tristan.
2008-01-28 Tristan Gingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* kern/rescue.c: Silently accept empty lines.
diff -ruNp -x '*~' -x CVS grub2.orig/kern/rescue.c grub2/kern/rescue.c
--- grub2.orig/kern/rescue.c2007-09-03 22:28:23.0 +0200
+++ grub2
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 05:55:04PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Hi Tristan!
[...]
> > This port deviate from other grub ports in modules: I currently use a trick
> > to provide basic module support: they are prelinked during installation.
> > This makes the initial port easier (and possible ot
On Jan 29, 2008 6:04 AM, walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bean wrote:
> > On Jan 28, 2008 10:37 PM, walt<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> >> Good news and bad news. With this patch and your most recent ufs patch
> >> I can aout /boot/loader or multiboot /netbsd from a UFS partition, that
> >> i
On Jan 29, 2008 3:11 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:37:16AM -0800, walt wrote:
> >
> > When I type 'boot' after loading the netbsd kernel with multiboot, the
> > machine reboots instantly instead of starting the OS.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
>
> I've encountered this in q
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:37:16AM -0800, walt wrote:
>
> When I type 'boot' after loading the netbsd kernel with multiboot, the
> machine reboots instantly instead of starting the OS.
>
> Any ideas?
>
I've encountered this in qemu where it tells you you are executing code
outside ram/rom at the
al=white/black", grub-emu is
completely black (I have to press "c" then "esc" twice).
grub version : Debian/sid's grub-pc_1.95+20080128-1_i386.deb
Franklin.
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
44 matches
Mail list logo
