http://darrningram.wordpress.com/
I find that blog posts here really enlightening! Why is it necessary to make
such a compromise towards customization removals with Australis in favor of
Third party interests?
And why you are forcing employees to go out in anonymity to speak about things
which
I agree with this guy.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/13/opinion/sunday/douthat-diversity-and-dishonesty.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
http://darrningram.wordpress.com
So... Mozilla's employee decisions, design decisions and General decision
process is depending on Groups from the outside?
If that is true i will remove your browser from my Computer and tell People not
to use it too.
Stop serving the influence from outside, Mo
Hi deloreanxx7,
the blog you link to doesn't sound like a reliable source at all: it's
riddled with misinformation and doesn't give any reason why the reader
should believe that the author is in fact a Mozilla developer. (I don't
know if that's supposed to mean that they're an employee or a contri
On 11/04/14 23:58, JoeS wrote:
> On 4/11/2014 2:54 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
>> In case it makes a difference, that quote was misattributed. Reid
>> Hoffman said that, not Mitchell. (She was somewhat upset that it was
>> misattributed.)
> This makes a huge difference in my assessment of the manage
Hi saphirjd,
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 6:05 PM, wrote:
> http://darrningram.wordpress.com/
>
> I find that blog posts here really enlightening! Why is it necessary to
> make such a compromise towards customization removals with Australis in
> favor of Third party interests?
>
> And why you are for
John,
Thanks for reaching out and contacting us, even if it is with criticism.
You may be interested to know that most Mozillians who expressed their
views supported Brendan Eich, regardless of their own positions on gay
marriage.
Best regards,
David
On 13/04/14 06:22, John Boley wrote:
> I am
Frankly, that looks fake.
Best regards,
David
On 14/04/14 08:22, delorean...@gmail.com wrote:
> http://darrningram.wordpress.com
>
> So... Mozilla's employee decisions, design decisions and General decision
> process is depending on Groups from the outside?
>
> If that is true i will remove y
I just read this blog and it looks like a fake.
Best regards,
David
On 13/04/14 18:05, saphi...@gmail.com wrote:
> http://darrningram.wordpress.com/
>
> I find that blog posts here really enlightening! Why is it necessary to make
> such a compromise towards customization removals with Australi
Il 14/04/14 08:22, delorean...@gmail.com ha scritto:
http://darrningram.wordpress.com
So... Mozilla's employee decisions, design decisions and General decision
process is depending on Groups from the outside?
Funny, it's the first time I read about Google driving Australis, this
sounds... conf
On 4/13/14, 5:00 PM, jsabash wrote:
> On 4/13/2014 12:38 PM, Michael Connor wrote:
>> I’d have been surprised if no one on the board raised the possibility
>> at that point. In a crisis, it’s important to put all of the options
>> on the table and understand the tradeoffs. As unpalatable as the i
Greetings,
We are gearing up for the launch of the public-facing Gear Store:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=995997
There will be long-term management tasks associated with approving
designs, campaigns, and other gear-related needs. I'd like to form a
module to own these decisions an
On Monday 2014-04-14 11:32 -0400, Geoffrey MacDougall wrote:
> We are gearing up for the launch of the public-facing Gear Store:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=995997
>
> There will be long-term management tasks associated with approving
> designs, campaigns, and other gear-related
Sorry; to clarify: I would be the owner in my capacity with the Foundation.
G.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:43 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
> On Monday 2014-04-14 11:32 -0400, Geoffrey MacDougall wrote:
>> We are gearing up for the launch of the public-facing Gear Store:
>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.o
Will there be individual peers as well? You named stakeholder teams, but
as David said, no individuals there, either. :-)
~ Gijs
On 14/04/2014 16:47, Geoffrey MacDougall wrote:
Sorry; to clarify: I would be the owner in my capacity with the Foundation.
G.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:43 AM, L.
Hi everyone,
Over the last few weeks I posted about the improvements to our privacy policies
and privacy hub (posts here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!searchin/mozilla.governance/%22privacy$20policy%22|sort:date/mozilla.governance/WlOg17DQWTY/l9d74cy4K8sJ).
Thanks for your fee
I am not sure what you think we should have done.
A few (I know of 4) employees of the Mozilla Foundation decided to send
over Twitter a message calling for the resignation of Brendan. We don't
have any power over Twitter, nor can we prevent people from expressing
their opinion.
By the way, since
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:39 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller
wrote:
> Frankly, that looks fake.
Whoever it is, they're now claiming to be a Mozilla employee:
http://darrningram.wordpress.com/2014/04/14/mozilla-and-australis-and-fair-play/
It's a weird blog. Blogs owned by Mozilla devs tend to be
we
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:39 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller
> wrote:
>> Frankly, that looks fake.
>
> Whoever it is, they're now claiming to be a Mozilla employee:
> http://darrningram.wordpress.com/2014/04/14/mozilla-and-australis-and-f
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
>
> The blog author appears to be this guy
> https://plus.google.com/102972851928663490169/posts judging by the
> little logged in Google Plus bit from the screenshots from Google News
> on his blog. I've never heard of him, and he's not listed as
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:40 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller
wrote:
> I just read this blog and it looks like a fake.
It is. Look at this screenshot in one of his posts:
http://darrningram.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/11.jpg
At the top right it shows the author is logged into Google+ using the
name
On 4/14/14, 4:35 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
The blog author appears to be this guy
https://plus.google.com/102972851928663490169/posts judging by the
little logged in Google Plus bit from the screenshots from Google News
on his blog. I've never heard of him, and he's not listed as an
employee of the
Oh, it gets even better: Chris Peterson noticed that the person who
started this thread is none other than Roland Haslinger, the very
person who has pretending to be the employee.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 9:05 AM, wrote:
> http://darrningram.wordpress.com/
>
> I find that blog posts here really e
23 matches
Mail list logo
