On Monday 2014-04-14 11:32 -0400, Geoffrey MacDougall wrote: > We are gearing up for the launch of the public-facing Gear Store: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=995997 > > There will be long-term management tasks associated with approving > designs, campaigns, and other gear-related needs. I'd like to form a > module to own these decisions and welcome community feedback, designs, > etc.. Initial stakeholders would be the Foundation, Creative, > Engagement, and Community teams. The Foundation would be the owner, as > we have financial responsibility.
Generally owners and peers of modules are individuals, not teams/companies. I think that provides clearer points of contact and a clearer understanding of who makes decisions. Is there a particular reason to do that differently in this case? -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
