Sorry; to clarify: I would be the owner in my capacity with the Foundation.
G. On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:43 AM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Monday 2014-04-14 11:32 -0400, Geoffrey MacDougall wrote: >> We are gearing up for the launch of the public-facing Gear Store: >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=995997 >> >> There will be long-term management tasks associated with approving >> designs, campaigns, and other gear-related needs. I'd like to form a >> module to own these decisions and welcome community feedback, designs, >> etc.. Initial stakeholders would be the Foundation, Creative, >> Engagement, and Community teams. The Foundation would be the owner, as >> we have financial responsibility. > > Generally owners and peers of modules are individuals, not > teams/companies. I think that provides clearer points of contact > and a clearer understanding of who makes decisions. Is there a > particular reason to do that differently in this case? > > -David > > -- > 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 > 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 > Before I built a wall I'd ask to know > What I was walling in or walling out, > And to whom I was like to give offense. > - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914) _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
