Will there be individual peers as well? You named stakeholder teams, but
as David said, no individuals there, either. :-)
~ Gijs
On 14/04/2014 16:47, Geoffrey MacDougall wrote:
Sorry; to clarify: I would be the owner in my capacity with the Foundation.
G.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:43 AM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote:
On Monday 2014-04-14 11:32 -0400, Geoffrey MacDougall wrote:
We are gearing up for the launch of the public-facing Gear Store:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=995997
There will be long-term management tasks associated with approving
designs, campaigns, and other gear-related needs. I'd like to form a
module to own these decisions and welcome community feedback, designs,
etc.. Initial stakeholders would be the Foundation, Creative,
Engagement, and Community teams. The Foundation would be the owner, as
we have financial responsibility.
Generally owners and peers of modules are individuals, not
teams/companies. I think that provides clearer points of contact
and a clearer understanding of who makes decisions. Is there a
particular reason to do that differently in this case?
-David
--
𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂
𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offense.
- Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
