This is still the wrong list for this conversation. You have now been
told twice.
/a
> On Oct 15, 2016, at 17:05, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>
>> On 2016-10-08 15:17, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>>> On 10/8/16 11:39 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>>>2. The ticket in which I reported that bugs.mozilla.org
Hi Adam,
I addressed this thread to both governance@ and bugmast...@lists.mozilla.org.
The initiator of this sub-thread dropped bugmasters, possibly involuntarily.
For my part, I merely retitled the sub-thread.
The initiator has already announced that his contribution to this thread was
over.
On 2016-10-08 15:17, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/8/16 11:39 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
2. The ticket in which I reported that bugs.mozilla.org allows
tickets to be marked as both WONTFIX and resolved
In Bugzilla, a bug can be in multiple states that indicate what work remains to be done on
Hi Boris,
On 2016-10-09 15:11, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Filipus,
This is my last post in this thread, since it's pretty clear to me that this is
going nowhere.
I thank you for your otherwise constructive intervention in this thread,
however I find it suboptimal to decide what your last post wil
On 2016-10-10 16:54, Svetlana Tkachenko wrote:
Good day,
For components as large as Firefox, I unfortunately cannot read each issue report before
deciding to use it. There are apparently 7350 open "bugs" reported against
Firefox (which excludes some components). Does that mean there are 7350
Hi Tom,
On 2016-10-10 03:00, Tom Farrow wrote:
I'd like to remind that this is a governance mailing list. Participatory
challenges and issues are better suited to the relevant teams, and Mozilla's
participation team, especially while it's unclear whether there is a wider
governance issue here
Good day,
> This is not a mailing list for disputing decisions made by bugzilla
> administrators.
>
> I am asking you to take this discussion off this list.
>
> The list for bugzilla.mozilla.org issues is https://lists.mozilla.org/
> listinfo/tools-bmo and through google groups at
> https://grou
Good day,
> For components as large as Firefox, I unfortunately cannot read each issue
> report before deciding to use it. There are apparently 7350 open "bugs"
> reported against Firefox (which excludes some components). Does that mean
> there are 7350 reported Firefox-specific issues which pe
Hi Svetlana,
On 2016-10-10 00:03, Svetlana Tkachenko wrote:
Good day,
I agree that waiting can help, but could you clarify which person you are
talking about, and how long you think is optimal to wait before coming
back?
No particular person - this is a broad principle.
Right. I did not bri
Hi Emma,
On 2016-10-10 03:49, Emma Humphries wrote:
Filipus,
This is not a mailing list for disputing decisions made by bugzilla
administrators.
I will consider disputing the decision made when I obtain the reasons behind
it, and do so on the most appropriate transparent forum I can find.
Filipus,
This is not a mailing list for disputing decisions made by bugzilla
administrators.
I am asking you to take this discussion off this list.
The list for bugzilla.mozilla.org issues is https://lists.mozilla.org/
listinfo/tools-bmo and through google groups at https://groups.google.com/
fo
I'd like to remind that this is a governance mailing list. Participatory
challenges and issues are better suited to the relevant teams, and
Mozilla's participation team, especially while it's unclear whether there
is a wider governance issue here
I'd propose that if you really want to tackle your
Good day,
> I agree that waiting can help, but could you clarify which person you are
> talking about, and how long you think is optimal to wait before coming
> back?
No particular person - this is a broad principle.
> In any case, forking an organization as known
> as Mozilla should not be done
Hi Benjamin,
On 2016-10-09 15:13, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
Filipus,
This is a governance mailing list and the issue you've raised is not a
governance matter rather something that deals with participation and
conduct.
Sorry but which issue are you referring to?
[...]
--
Filipus Klutiero
http:
Filipus,
This is a governance mailing list and the issue you've raised is not a
governance matter rather something that deals with participation and
conduct.
You might wish to contact the participation team but this matter seems
settled and final.
On Oct 9, 2016 11:48 AM, "Filipus Klutiero" wro
Filipus,
This is my last post in this thread, since it's pretty clear to me that
this is going nowhere. But just on the off chance that you really are
missing something instead of being willfully obtuse, I will try one last
time.
On 10/9/16 2:15 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
That is not even
On 2016-10-09 12:49, Wayne wrote:
On 10/9/2016 10:46 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
On 2016-10-09 07:58, Wayne wrote:
On 10/8/2016 3:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/8/16 11:39 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
2. The ticket in which I reported that bugs.mozilla.org allows
tickets to be marked as
Hi Boris,
On 2016-10-08 15:17, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/8/16 11:39 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
[...]
3. Three of these were marked as incomplete, when there was no
request for any more information about these.
I agree that private mail to ask for the information may have been better.
On 10/9/2016 10:46 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
On 2016-10-09 07:58, Wayne wrote:
On 10/8/2016 3:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/8/16 11:39 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
2. The ticket in which I reported that bugs.mozilla.org allows
tickets to be marked as both WONTFIX and resolved
In Bug
On 2016-10-09 07:58, Wayne wrote:
On 10/8/2016 3:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/8/16 11:39 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
2. The ticket in which I reported that bugs.mozilla.org allows
tickets to be marked as both WONTFIX and resolved
In Bugzilla, a bug can be in multiple states that indi
Hi Svetlana,
On 2016-10-09 05:33, Svetlana Tkachenko wrote:
Good day,
When someone disagrees, pace down and come back to it later; don't keep
working on them (or the issue) in frustration. From my observation
failing to do this has contributed to a majority of bans on the
Internet.
I agree th
On 10/8/2016 3:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/8/16 11:39 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
2. The ticket in which I reported that bugs.mozilla.org allows
tickets to be marked as both WONTFIX and resolved
In Bugzilla, a bug can be in multiple states that indicate what work
remains to be done o
Good day,
When someone disagrees, pace down and come back to it later; don't keep
working on them (or the issue) in frustration. From my observation
failing to do this has contributed to a majority of bans on the
Internet.
Since Mozilla software is free, you are not obligated to stay on
bugzilla.
On 10/8/16 11:39 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
2. The ticket in which I reported that bugs.mozilla.org allows
tickets to be marked as both WONTFIX and resolved
In Bugzilla, a bug can be in multiple states that indicate what work
remains to be done on it: UNCONFIRMED, NEW, RESOLVED (and REOPE
24 matches
Mail list logo
