Filipus, This is not a mailing list for disputing decisions made by bugzilla administrators.
I am asking you to take this discussion off this list. The list for bugzilla.mozilla.org issues is https://lists.mozilla.org/ listinfo/tools-bmo and through google groups at https://groups.google.com/ forum/#!forum/mozilla.tools.bmo. - E C Humphries On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Tom Farrow <t...@mozilla.org.uk> wrote: > I'd like to remind that this is a governance mailing list. Participatory > challenges and issues are better suited to the relevant teams, and > Mozilla's participation team, especially while it's unclear whether there > is a wider governance issue here > > I'd propose that if you really want to tackle your difficulties, you > discuss them with both the bugzilla team and the participation team. > > This thread is become quite large and the discussion isn't the style people > typically associate with this list. > > I do understand fully your difficulties, and hope that you find a solution > for them, just, (correct me if I'm wrong), this probably isn't the ideal > place. > > Maybe a more clarified issue will come back to this list if it's actionable > by governance. > > On Sunday, October 9, 2016, Filipus Klutiero <chea...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Svetlana, > > > > On 2016-10-09 05:33, Svetlana Tkachenko wrote: > > > >> Good day, > >> > >> When someone disagrees, pace down and come back to it later; don't keep > >> working on them (or the issue) in frustration. From my observation > >> failing to do this has contributed to a majority of bans on the > >> Internet. > >> > > > > I agree that waiting can help, but could you clarify which person you are > > talking about, and how long you think is optimal to wait before coming > back? > > > > > >> Since Mozilla software is free, you are not obligated to stay on > >> bugzilla.mozilla.org -- you still can fix these bugs within the > >> infrastructure of a new or existing fork. > >> > > > > Mozilla is one of the main projects which brought me to free software. I > > have used Mozilla software for most of the 13 years since I switched to > the > > good old Mozilla Suite. In any case, forking an organization as known as > > Mozilla should not be done lightly. > > > > While the issues I exposed may be grave, the number of persons involved > is > > small relative to the number of contributors, and some of the meta-issues > > are trivial to solve. I am far from thinking that the situation is > hopeless. > > > > However, I am not particularly aware of the project's status. If you > think > > this situation may carry on, would you recommend switching to a > particular > > fork? > > > > -- > > Filipus Klutiero > > http://www.philippecloutier.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > governance mailing list > > governance@lists.mozilla.org > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > > > > > -- > -- > *Tom Farrow* > * Participation Volunteer* > Mozilla > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > governance@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
