y vocal about [1][2]. I think the answer
here is to find a balance of some sort - i.e. keep vulnerabilities in
rare cases for short periods of time and then disclose and patch them.
However for that to work we need to trust the govt. to do the right
thing. Which I think is pretty much the core issue t
Hi
Just installed GnuPG 1.4.16 for Windows (on XP over here).
gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.16
Now I see in the signed messages that the version information about
GnuPG is very short:
Version: GnuPG v1
Bug or feature?
--
Beste Grüsse,
Martin mailto:msch
eCrypt container with a very strong password.
Even if someone cracked that container, he would find my encrypted private
key, with an even stronger password. If he would be able to bruteforce even
that password, I think then I am dealing with an enemy with godlike powers
anyways.
Any input is greatly
ner
(which I am already doing when I use Dropbox). I have read blog posts where
people say that they even put their private master key openly into the wild
because it has a strong passphrase and strong encryption anyways.
Cheers,
Martin
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Einar Ryeng wrote:
>
if needed?
Any reasons why I should stick to GPGs "native" subkey feature?
Many thanks for your help in advance!
Best regards,
Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
@Chris: That still leaves the problem of having to enter the passphrase for
the key on the untrusted machine, which might have a keylogger, doesn't it?
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Christopher J. Walters wrote:
> On 7/23/2013 3:55 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
>
>> Am 23.07.2013 21:04,
Wow that landing page looks like a super cheap rip-off of http://heml.is/...
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 7/26/2013 10:45 PM, Randolph D. wrote:
> > Does anyone know, if this tool is really secure?
>
> Based only on their press release, this seems like a complete
ore.
I would suggest (if you haven't tried that already). To try a different
machine and/or a different reader combos and see if the problem is not a
trivial faulty reader.
Regards,
Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCgAdF
esses lingering but can potentially cause other problems.
Martin
[1] - https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/logind.conf.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEXpvIcrLGPB3dYM2b2/3pjiVWvVwFAlnwuuIACgkQ2/3pjiVW
vVzBhA//Z0F8mWp6z4ce9rFMi/9J0sm8u71/HZI4IIAOsZoaJ
ery* email user? But there the
standard today IS that mails are HTML-written and contain links and
pictures and so on. If GnuPG should be a tool for "everybody" HTML
mail must be encrypted and decrypted correctly by the clients and
GnuPG should give any important info
on Canonical Ubuntu for smartphones/tablets and UBports devices.
To show that developers of clients take the situation seriously one
example: Today I got an update for Android R2Mail2 which fixes the
#efail problem.
There's still a chance ;-)
--
Regards
Martin
pgpZi5sBPmIY2.pgp
Descripti
Hello Matthias,
Friday, May 18, 2018, 3:40:53 PM, you wrote:
> Jürgen Schmidt is a dedicated OpenPGP hater. Be warned and/or just
> ignore this comment.
And again recommandatioin for Signal. It seems to be a PR campaign -
but a very bad one.
--
Best regards,
- --
Best regards,
Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE92uV/w2x7WB1p4XLsdyR185C444FAl9jgAcACgkQsdyR185C
445wzwf/QiBWBkH9UW6jzh7vbFbENQG39dBZTpK5TmG0BwRsdq72y4ccGpaCfZM9
02xSMeQ8ajPJ8luBH2cYHK+iBOQLlztl9yYj1crTYE+B0LBLWUMNlaH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi list
Which keyserver do you recommend these days?
I have hkps://keys.openpgp.org in gpg.conf - but it seems that there
are missing a lot of public keys on this server.
- --
Best regards,
Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
Hi
I am really not a programmer ;-) but I tried to compile GnuPG 2.2.32 on my
Ubuntu 20.04 system.
Before I compiled libgcrypt 1.8.8 - seems to work, no error messages. So
these libreriers are going to /usr/local/lib
So I tell configure for GnuPG 2.2.32 to take this libgcrypt 1.8.8 files
with .
Hello Bernhard,
Tuesday, October 26, 2021, 9:37:47 AM, you wrote:
> Am Montag 25 Oktober 2021 17:01:15 schrieb Martin:
>> But after "make" and "make install" I see the the GnuPG 2.2.32 doesn't use
>> libgcrypt 1.8.8 but 1.8.5 (which was installed by
k has a bad or strange https
certificate...
What are the reasons for such a procedure and what is the advantage?
--
Best regards,
Martin
pgpUEqarpFiso.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnup
by the key ID.
It just seemed like a contradiction to me if a key for security
reasons should be downloaded from a website with an insufficient
certificate ;-)
- --
Best regards,
Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE92uV/w2x7WB1p4XLsdyR185C444FAmPaiooACgkQsdyR185C
444E1Af9Eb7h9K
ever will be in accordance
> with
> our privacy policy.
Could you please explain this, I don't understand really. So there are
public and no public keys on the this key-server? Who decides that a
key is public or non-public? Who or how can I request a non-public
key?
Martin
pgpZGo
Hello Vincent,
Ok - that is clear now. I never had the idea to get a "whole list"
from a key server but I didn't understand why people let access their
key only on their own website.
Martin
Thursday, February 2, 2023, 9:45:53 PM, you wrote:
>> Could you please
y system?
How many computers are out there where not even a single part of the
hardware (and firmware) is proprietary?
Where do you draw the line? If I would have to guess, I would say, the
device you wrote that sentence with, falls in the category
semi-proprietary...
greetings
Martin
-BEGIN P
milar for up to 3 different encryption methods.
So especially when introducing new algorithms which might be tampered
with, using e.g. an old style RSA Key as one layer and ECC as a second
should help against this. Or am I missing something here?
Greetings
Martin
-1&q=mac+installer++site:lists.gnupg.org%2Fpipermail%2Fgnupg-users%2F2014
Looks also interesting for 2014. Maybe there will also be some results
for 2015? Hope that gets you somewhere.
Greetings
Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYF
e correct information in the
libgcrypt Wikipedia entry.
So please put in the missing information yourself, or someone or post
them on my discussion page or via e-mail (I would appreciate an easy
to c/p format) and I will enter them.
Greetings
Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/11/15 20:28, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello, [...]
>
> sig!3 P0x58A2D94A93A0B9CE 2015-03-27
> never Sebastian Wiesinger sig-3
> 1 0x5E5CCCB4A4BF43D7 2015-11-14 never Governikus OpenPGP
> Signaturservice (Neuer Personalaus
pagate the signature anyway. It's not a dealbreaker but it's
> still a bit irritating.
>
> Thanks,
> Lachlan
>
Without thinking a lot about it on my part, but wouldn't a separate
signing sub-key help with this?
Greetings
Martin
_
fully works as expected but
Nitrokey HSM fails with
OpenPGgpg2 --card-status
gpg: selecting openpgp failed: Card error
gpg: OpenPGP card not available: Card error
Kind Regards
--martin konold
--
Dipl.-Physiker Martin Konold
e r f r a k o n Partnerschaftsgesellschaft
Erlewein, Frank, Konold
11 -new -key 0:10 -keyform engine -out cert.pem -text -x509 -
days 3640
Kind Regards
--martin konold
--
Dipl.-Physiker Martin Konold
e r f r a k o n Partnerschaftsgesellschaft
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttg
ed data packet:
length: unknown
mdc_method: 2
gpg: encrypted with 1 passphrase
gpg: using subkey 1234567890ABCDEF instead of primary key 1234567890ABCDEF
gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 1234567890ABCDEF, created
2018-13-34
"Martin"
gpg: public key decryption
the private key exclusivly on an
OpenPGP Smartcard. This only requires a stub in the keyring which can be
recreated on demand.
Kind Regards
--martin konold
--
Dipl.-Physiker Martin Konold
e r f r a k o n Partnerschaftsgesellschaft
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Inge
CAMELLIA192 AES CAST5 CAMELLIA128 BLOWFISH IDEA 3DES
personal-digest-preferences SHA512 SHA384 SHA256 SHA224 AES256 AES192
AES CAST5 ZLIB BZIP2 ZIP Uncompressed
s2k-digest-algo SHA512
keyserver hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
keyserver-options
ca-cert-file=/home/martin/.gnupg/sks
gent need to use two smartcards on the same computer and
account I recommend to make use of scdaemon.conf and seperate GNUHOME
directories. You may then differentiate between the two cards with the gpg --
homedir commandline option.
Kind Regards
--martin konold
--
Dipl.-Physiker Martin Konold
s each configured
for a different USB device (scdaemon.conf)
While imho pkcs#11 is ugly it really is a tool to gain interoperability while
cleaning up a lot of mess (many people are confused with the current
situation) and make encryption available to the masses.
Kind Regards
--martin konold
-
ine user interface of gpg be different if the private
keys reside on smartcards compared to a keyring in the filesystem?
What do you think?
Kind Regards
--martin konold
--
Dipl.-Physiker Martin Konold
e r f r a k o n Partnerschaftsgesellschaft
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - B
and --cipher-algo is not given.
So CAST5 is the preferred cipher for secret keys and is also the default
for symmetric. On the other hand using --personal-cipher-preferences does
not seem to apply to symmetric + public encryption. Is this by design?
Regards,
Martin
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 at 14:52
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the advice. I will have a look at the mailing list. For now I am
happy that I have a working solution.
Thank you and Vedaal for the help.
Regards,
Martin
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 at 11:12 Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 29/02/16 11:51, Martin Ilchev wrote:
> > So CAS
the above for test use but now I am using it every day at work,
at home and on my laptop without any issues. I can sign, encrypt/decrypt as
well as authenticate for SSH with a single smart card.
Let me know if you need any additional information.
Regards,
Martin
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 at 17:44 A
Hello,
since few days we face of an issue to decrypt files (.gpg) with GNUPG 1.4.9
We get error:
***
gpg: fatal: open(CONOUT$) failed: The system cannot find the file specified.
secmem usage: 0/0 bytes in 0/0 blocks of pool 0/32768
***
If issue w
Hi list
How to set GnuPG 2.0.30 configuration that the console output has the
correct charset on Windows 7. The language is set to German in
registry - but Umlauts are not displayed correctly.
Thanks.
m.s.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnu
without directly having the private key of the mailing list on the mailing
list server.
What do you think about IBCPRE.
Regards
--martin
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
--martin konold
--
Dipl.-Physiker Martin Konold
e r f r a k o n
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Phys
Hi,
I am aware that one can update all the keys in local-keyring from a
keyserver using "gpg --refresh-keys". Are there any disadvantages to
simply put this command into user crontab and execute for example once
a day?
thanks,
Martin
___
G
Thank you for all the replies!
Martin
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Brian Minton wrote:
>
>
> On 10/17/2016 11:41 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On Mon 2016-10-17 06:31:16 -0400, Martin T wrote:
>>
>>> I am aware that one can update all the keys in loca
Hi,
I imported a public key from keyserver which has multiple UIDs and one
of those UIDs is revoked. When I execute "gpg --list-keys "
then I see only active UIDs and not that one revoked UID. Is there a
way to list that revoked UID? Or wasn't that imported in the first
place?
Thanks! This did the trick.
Martin
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 18/10/16 12:42, Martin T wrote:
>> Is there a
>> way to list that revoked UID?
>
> I think it's:
>
> gpg --list-options show-unusable-uids --list-keys <...>
&
c
key belongs to right person in business to business communication?
thanks,
Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
and asks Bob to
confirm that it matches.
I guess this provides reasonable security?
thanks,
Martin
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> Hi Martin--
>
> On Wed 2016-10-26 16:21:48 -0400, Martin T wrote:
>
>> let's say that Alice from company A
make yet a new key-set, and this time I'll be more organised
and make a revoke certificate, that I'll keep in a safe place, together
with the secret key, and the paraphrase.
Again - thanks all, your a grate group.
:-) Martin
___
Gnupg-user
the card reader and I don't even get the opportunity to enter it
from my keyboard by mistake. This is the way I want it.
Since I don't know where to start, I attached a log from scdaemon. If
you need any additional information, I will be happy to provide it.
Have a good time,
Martin
G allows for both proving a message's authenticity and preventing
eavesdropping. It's one of the most important tools I use every day.
I'll try to come up with a better one ASAP.
Best,
Martin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
om
Could somebody please advice how I can use gpg without temporary files ?
many thanks,
Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
omics and is therefore supposed to crash at some
point. Choosing goteo was IMHO a good idea because their system is Free
Software and I don't know if they even support BTC et al.
Just my €0,02
Martin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_
Too bad I missed. Where did you get with the ECC discussion?
m.
--
Martin
+372 515 6495
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> [Seems my email from my cellphone got stuck in the moderator queue. So
>
If you have a web server *and* a client where you can control the
session cache and initiate a re-negotiation, Firefox will try to look
at your token again.
At least this was the case a while ago.
--
Martin
+372 515 6495
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Urs Hunkeler wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
t me can handle that, but also the people who
sent me encrypted mails. (And if not, does it make sense to implement
something like this in gnupg?)
And a more general question: This approach generates some overhead so
is there maybe a way to achieve something similar more easily?
Thanks for ideas an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 13.03.2014 16:42, schrieb ved...@nym.hush.com:
>
> On Thursday, March 13, 2014 at 8:03 AM, "Martin Behrendt"
> wrote:Hi,
>
>> I want to achieve the following: 1. A Master signing key 2. A
>> subkey signing/e
eone at least also starts thinking about the problem and comes up
with a good solution.
Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEAREKAAYFAlMh+CkACgkQ/6vdZgk46sg1xwCgk3b9UyFmpOvAwoPQNIIXe1L+
/d4An1j5QQzTyKWVNNQhkyWd7+ejnrOG
=Cas0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 17.03.2014 11:34, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>> The YYY (->a famous three letter agency) e.g. denies to archive
>> content of YYY citizens mails. It is thus perfectly reasonable to
>> assume it does so with all other ones.
>
> This is not a reason
Am 17.03.2014 17:54, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>> That is an odd comparison. What does a statement about a fundamental
>> law of physics which you can't change have to do with a statement
>> about what you are doing, where you are perfectly free to do something
>> else than you say?
>
> Try some v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 18.03.2014 15:01, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>
> My other position is that we have to be careful what we believe.
> In these times it's tempting to see shadows and jump at them,
> believing that we're seeing the bogeyman. We have to resist this
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 18.03.2014 19:34, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
> (1) Given how many flat wrong things get printed in the newspaper,
> believing this reporting may not be wise.
>
While this in general is true, I really wonder why you say that in the
current contex
No. 4k is the reasonable maximum.
--
Martin
+372 515 6495
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:37 PM, -- -- wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just for the sake of curiosity, is it possible to store a 8192 bit RSA key
> on the OpenPGP smart card? Two keys ? Three keys?
>
> Thank you, please in
header.
[1]
http://blogs.fsfe.org/gollo/2014/04/13/what-the-heartbleed-bug-revealed-to-me/
[2] https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=gnupg.org
Thanks,
Martin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 03.05.2014 05:01, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:>
> And regardless of whether it's a good practice or a bad one, I've
> worked in businesses that have done exactly this -- so it's a
> real-world example that demonstrates the occasional need for a
> thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 04.05.2014 10:30, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>
> Are there good business reasons for third party escrow of signing
> keys? Quite probably. If you can think of a situation where an
> autopen is appropriate, whether in business or in government,
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 04.05.2014 12:52, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>> No, there are no good reasons.
>
> If that's an axiom in your system, then so be it. But let's not
> go about thinking that's something you've deduced from principles.
>
Well I haven't heard any so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 05.05.2014 12:55, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>
>> This is, again, rhetoric and not an argument. I explained that
>> before.
>
> As I explained, you are choosing not to recognize the argument.
>
You honestly seem to think that "We are doing $A, s
answer is not possible at this time. Because they
probably will become frequently asked questions in the future**. ;)
But I can understand if that is going to be dealt with, when we are at
that point in time.
regards
Martin
* What will be a good default key length and why e.g.
** maybe true for some
Am 14.08.2014 um 04:32 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
> On 8/13/2014 5:22 PM, Martin Behrendt wrote:
>> Because they probably will become frequently asked questions in the
>> future.
>
> The questions experts think will be frequently asked are usually rarely
> asked. :)
>
Am 18.08.2014 um 14:31 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
> On 8/18/2014 2:01 AM, Johan Wevers wrote:
>> And who determines wether it has any "testimonial value"?
>
> Johan, we're entering paranoid fantasy here. If you truly believe the
> whole of the USG is corrupt, and that our independent judiciary is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 19.08.2014 um 21:16 schrieb MFPA:
> Hi
>
>
> On Monday 18 August 2014 at 8:21:06 PM, in
> , Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>
>
>
>> No, the Fourth Amendment protects all people within U.S. borders
>> equally. Americans get no special protections ove
e and prevents him from revoking
the key. In this case preventing someone from sending you information
which might harm your well being is a good thing.*
Since the sender can't know how you use the expiration date I guess the
more conservative approach is the safer one if you consider extreme
cases l
me
time after that date.
And I think the same confusion is going on with respect to the
expiration date in our context. And I am all for not overloading the
meaning of words, so if I read expiration date than for me this is a
dead line. If you mean "best before" than I would prefer if people say
it like this.
Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Am 16.09.2014 um 16:41 schrieb Werner Koch:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:52, martin-gnupg-us...@dkyb.de said:
>
>> In Germany on food products you will find the word "Expiration Date"
>> which literally means: "Don't eat me after that date." But there is a
If you assume she is new to gpg I guess that is a wrong expectation.
greetings
Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Am 27.10.2014 um 19:20 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
> Just received word back from a friend of mine who's a law professor
> focusing in electronic civil liberties, and is a former Commissioner of
> the FCC to boot. He's skeptical that ITAR/EAR enforcement will affect
> U.S. hackers participating in l
en). Maybe there is a difference between exporting the public part
of a key and the private part.
Anyway, enjoy your life.
Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ust successfully created a private key,
exported it, imported it with an outdated (portable) gnupg version and
used it with no problems.
Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
o problem.
google e.g.: "plain text attacks on gnupg site:gnupg.org"
Greetings
Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
exchange rate are you at?
And how do you treat multiple donations by the same person? :)
Greetings Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYFAlSPMqIACgkQ/6vdZgk46si53wCgyNkYByjSaZkgwOP+/DmUlWgE
cjQAoKK0eSbhDTmMyUStPJmMvhxV1f7L
=N8kD
-END
non-Android-GUI issues.
Martin
--
Martin
+372 515 6495
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:55 AM, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let me record a bit of history.
>
> On 02/13/2015 01:19 AM, Brian Minton wrote:
>> I recently got a new Nexus 5, with NFC. Supposedly it supports ISO
>
folks and somebody on the internet has, I would not blame GPGTools
guys for doing it. Yes, it would be nice if one at least tried to
contribute back to upstream and to work in an open manner, but at
least they DO something, for what there is apparent need.
Martin
___
..
SHA-3, on the other hand, will be very well-studied when it becomes a
standard, so we should in a way be able to trust it as much as we
trust AES. Google "SHA-3 competition" for more information.
Take care!
Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
with this behavoir? Can email clients find
out what key to use if there is no known email address?
What do you think?
Kind regards from the CeBIT town;)
Martin
--
http://www.bretschneidernet.de/OpenPGP-key: 0x4EA52583
_o)(o_ Albert Einstein
Am Samstag 27 Februar 2010 schrieb Laurent Jumet:
Hi Laurent,
> Martin Bretschneider wrote:
> > I want to recreate my GnuPG keys. My question is if I can omit the
> > email address? Since I do not want my email addresses to appear on
> > the keyservers because of spammers a
Am Samstag 27 Februar 2010 schrieb Laurent Jumet:
> Hello Martin !
>
> Martin Bretschneider wrote:
> >> You can use whatever you want to identify your key.
> >> But in some cases, mail programs expect to find your e-mail.
> >
> > that was my exp
heck if that message
was really sent by you. If it's only encrypted, there is no proof for
that since everyone who knows the recipient's public key can encrypt
messages for this particular person.
All the best,
Martin
--
The early worm is for the birds.
pgp5z5w27fqOS.pgp
Desc
scdaemon reports an unknown PC/SC error code. This is all
I could find out. I also tried to disable the internal CCID driver, but
this didn't change anything. I still receive different error messages
(like "no card found" although the card is inserted).
Any hints what I could do?
* freej...@is-not-my.name [110113 11:35]:
> P.S. Robert, how about trimming your line lengths!
Apple Mail sucks at this ;)
Martin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
h
hose only claiming to support MIME).
I think this would be really great. Do you think it's worth the effort
to contact the developers of Thunderbird/Enigmail, Mutt, Gnus and some
others that support OpenPGP about this?
Thanks,
Martin
--
For extra security, this message ha
ogether with APG). But K9 only supports inline-PGP, PGP/MIME
> messages are not displayed.
This is true, but K9 at least does display the messages correctly.
Despite that, PGP/MIME support is being worked on because it's
considered better than inline PGP.
Martin
pgp5TiVUPmun3.pgp
Des
is the case. Nevertheless, your
statement is not true as such. PGP/MIME *does* work, but there are MUAs
out there which can't cope with it.
Martin
pgpZ7aij3sSJ8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://li
* Daniel Kahn Gillmor [110225 18:31]:
> On 02/25/2011 12:11 PM, Martin Gollowitzer wrote:
> > * Patrick Brunschwig [110225 10:10]:
> >> The only mail client on Android I know of to handle OpenPGP messages is
> >> K9 (together with APG). But K9 only supports inline-PGP,
* Avi [110225 19:21]:
> For those of us who use webmail, inline signatures are rather
> useful.
There are webmail applications supporting PGP/MIME. If yours doesn't, it
is not a good one. Inline signatures are not a good thing IMHO.
Martin
pgpPpk4wPE5Xj.pgp
Description: PG
res.
Despite that, there are MUAs which do not automatically parse every
message completely to see if there's inline PGP content in them, but if
the see that a message uses PGP/MIME they immediately try to
decrypt/verify the message.
Martin
pgpJv55KyzBlt.
.
[1] http://download.fsfe.org/tools/cardreader/udev-howto-automatization.sh
[2] http://wiki.fsfe.org/Card_howtos/Card_with_subkeys_using_backups
All the best,
Martin
pgpRWFRaMoTaW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnu
reader if some malware script or something weird tries to run gpg
> commands while the card is activated.
My multitasking capabilities are not good enough for parallely working
on my PC and always watching my card reader at the same time ;-)
Martin
pgpGEbCqRyk43.pgp
Description: PGP signatu
* David Tomaschik [110227 19:22]:
> How about "inline confuses users who don't know anything about OpenPGP"?
100% agreed. Thank you!
Martin
pgpOXtxwgzgho.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-us
lace).
> 2. And seeing strange MIME attachments doesn't confuse people?
Less than strange text fragments at the head and the bottom of a message
(Some people even think they are being spammed when they see inline PGP
data), because an attachment without useful data will rather be ignored.
get NS records again, but lookup of the pools doesn't
work.
Martin
pgp6C9Hm4NnQN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
sfe.org/Fellows/mk/EmailGuide
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
[3] http://www.guckes.net/mail/editing.html
Martin
pgpzM6GEPIAHL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/m
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
