Am 11.01.2016 um 17:35 schrieb Lachlan Gunn: >> >> >>> You've already received good answers on your questions, so some questions >> for you. :) What is your concern about signing the key? And are you aware >> that local signatures will not be communicated beyond your keyring? > > > I actually ran into this issue the other day. For me it's problematic > because my certification key is on an offline machine, so it's inconvenient > to have to power it up and do a round-trip through the airgap when I'm not > going to propagate the signature anyway. It's not a dealbreaker but it's > still a bit irritating. > > Thanks, > Lachlan >
Without thinking a lot about it on my part, but wouldn't a separate signing sub-key help with this? Greetings Martin _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
