I got the forwarding working, gpg-connect-agent says "connection to agent is
in restricted mode" and gives me a prompt. So am I all set? Doesn't seem
like that.
My GPG_AGENT_INFO is empty, as it is on my local machine where everything
works as expected (once my gpg-agent is running, has a key, an
Werner Koch gnupg.org> writes:
> Are you sure that the gpg version at the remote site is also >= 2.1?
> Given that you used the option "--use-agent" I assume that this is a gpg
> 1.4.
>
> For that feature to work you need GnuPG 2.1 local and remote. The
> reason is that only since 2.1 gpg diver
dear members of gnupg-users,
prolog:
hello my name is daniel. if i may introduce myself, i'm not an entirely
sophisticated or seasoned unix/linux user and usually dependend on
whatever snippets of information i can find in forums and on the web
that give me usually a ballpark idea of w
r your reply, you've all been very helpful and I
appreciate it greatly.
Sincerely,
daniel
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
--
pgp fingerprint: 02EF 1CA4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Hope this question is OK on this list.
What is the CA fingerprint on FSFE-Smartcard?
A gpg2 --car-status gave the information:
CA fingerprint 1 .: C485 A6CD 7EC6 6E9E EC33 65F2 70F2 75E4 C32F 6CA5
This is a smartcard issued by the FSFE. After
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 02.04.2015 um 04:40 schrieb NIIBE Yutaka:
> It seems that it's intended to be hold a fingerprint of OpenPGP,
> but it is not clear what/how this fingerprint is used for.
>
> From a view point of scdaemon developer, I don't have any
> experience
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 03.04.2015 um 13:14 schrieb Werner Koch:
> Back in 2005 the idea was to setup our own OpenPGP "CA" and the
> FSFE prepared the cards for this (this is also one of the the
> reasons for the PIN letter). However, the folks responsible for
> the
> sub 2048R/0BE64ECE 2015-04-01
> sig! A5452207 2015-04-01 Alice User (Signature Test)
>
>
> 1 bad signature
==What Should Happen==
When importing public keys, --with-sig-check should not get silently ignored
when added to --import or --recv-keys. Alternatively,
Gotcha. Would it be possible to throw an error when --with-sig-check
is included with --import or --recv-keys? When silently ignored, it is
very easy for a user to assume that the signature checks passed.
Daniel
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 2015 01
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> This made me notice that my --card-status does the same thing, it
> shows my signing subkey at "General key info" (although I thought
> at some point it used to show the master...). That said, everything
> works fine and my card is usable (v2.1.3).
I'm using Arch Linux and running a custom kernel (version 4.0.2) and
I'm unable to use the --refresh-keys function. I know the kernel is
the problem because when I reboot into the ARCH distribution kernel
(also version 4.0.2) it works fine. It's only my custom kernel that
has this issue. I need
Hello,
maybe I’m blind, but how can I receive a key from a pka- or
OpenPGP-DNS-entry without encrypting a (dummy-)file?
Sincerely,
DaB.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
y left it out.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:33 AM, mark hellewell
wrote:
> Smells like something to do with IPv6
>
> On 14 May 2015 at 12:41, Daniel Bomar wrote:
>> I'm using Arch Linux and running a custom kernel (version 4.0.2) and
>> I'm unable to use the --refresh-key
Hello,
Am 15.05.2015 um 16:20 schrieb Daniel Bomar:
> If I ping either of those hostnames it sends only an A query
that’s normal, because the ping-command works only for IPv4.
Sincerely,
DaB.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
h
I verified this to be the case in Wireshark. It's sending both A and
queries for hostname vod.ohai.su (not sure how it got that from
pool.sks-keyservers.net but whatever probably not relevant.) However
it's only GPG that seems to do this. If I ping either of those
hostnames it sends only an
Hello,
Am 15.05.2015 um 13:33 schrieb Werner Koch:
> gpg2 --auto-key-locate clear,nodefault,pka --locate-key ADDRESS
ah ok, thanks. I forgot to consult the man-page for gpg2, sorry.
Sincerely,
DaB.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.or
are
confidentials. Professionnal tools don't need this historical
workaround to compensate for Outlook lack of E-mail history managment.
daniel AzuelosR.S.S.I. - C.I.S.O. - Institut Pasteur
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Thanks for the new release,
> * Support for the forthcoming version 3 OpenPGP smartcard.
Is there any further information you can provide regarding version 3
of the smartcard? Searching the web didn't give me any useful results.
Thanks
DK
-BE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 12.06.2015 um 02:34 schrieb NIIBE Yutaka:
> And please follow the link "OpenPGP Card version 3.0", then you
> can get the specification.
>
> http://www.g10code.com/docs/openpgp-card-3.0.pdf
>
> That's all I know of.
Thanks for pointing me ther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 17.06.2015 um 01:45 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>> Is this a correct interpretation?
>
> Pretty close.
>
>> My understanding of en-/decryption is that there is no
>> indication of progress toward finding a successful key match of a
>> given encryp
Will the proposal require support private subkey stubs generated from
gpg --export-secret-subkeys?
Daniel
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Tankred Hase wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm Tankred from Whiteout (https://whiteout.io). Me, Werner and other
> PGP projects discussed a secure way
; perhaps be better.
>
SKS keyservers accept lookups for both short and long key ids,
fingerprints, and word searches on user ids[1]. Perhaps the Message-ID
should be the fingerprint + user ids (i.e. "0xf75be... Daniel Roesler
"), so that a client can easily index/search their
mailbox
ttacks outburst.
daniel AzuelosR.S.S.I. - C.I.S.O. - Institut Pasteur
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
g/)
https://github.com/isislovecruft/python-gnupg
(what runs https://python-gnupg.readthedocs.org/)
I also have a super-duper experimental and completely unfinished and
unsafe OpenPGP parser[1] that I use to learn the format and to dump
the sks-keyserver pool to json[2].
Daniel
[1]: https://github.c
Hello,
Am 27.07.2015 um 14:15 schrieb Neal H. Walfield:
> This approach is not going to stop a nation state. A nation state can
> intercept the mail, decrypt it and follow the link.
>
> For the same reason, it is not going to stop a user's ISP. Given
> Microsoft's et al.'s willingness to coopera
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 4:15 AM, MFPA
<2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi
>
>
> On Sunday 16 August 2015 at 9:10:28 AM, in
> , Stefan Claas wrote:
>
>
>
>> after seeing Facebook's public key a couple of days
>> ago, i was wonde
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Christian Heinrich
wrote:
>
> So as far as I am aware there is no integration with the Facebook
> GraphAPI yet :(
I asked a while back, and they are considering it.
https://twitter.com/sweis/status/605440779406974976
_
You can use the --show-session-key and --override-session-key option for
gpg.
$ gpg --encrypt <<< "Test Message" > msg
$ gpg --decrypt --show-session-key msg
$ gpg --decrypt --override-session-key 'the_session_key_gpg_gave_you'
Note that you do not need your private key for the last operation.
H
culate the public key pem (without an ASN.1 parser) and raw data
payload. Maybe that can give you some ideas on how to make gpg signatures
compatible with openssl.
Daniel
On Oct 4, 2015 4:44 PM, wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i've googled a lot and i guess it is just not possible but i want to ask
just download the source and open it locally for a
quick, cross-compatible OpenPGP user interface without having to
install anything or get admin privileges. I should work anywhere you
can open it in a browser (which is what I love about unhosted apps).
Really sad to see it isn't open source yet.
Hello,
Am 27.10.2015 um 11:11 schrieb Felix E. Klee:
> As already mentioned in the October 2015 thread “Bad secret key” on
> , I cannot generate a 4096 bit on
> my [OpenPGP card][1]. What could be the issue?
AFAIK the card doesn’t support 4096 bit keys. The webpage given by you
says the same AFAIS
Hello,
Am 29.10.2015 um 15:06 schrieb Neal H. Walfield:
> First, some
> statistics are displayed, namely, that we've verified 5 messages
> signed by this key in the past last hour.
isn’t it a little bit problematic that GPG now logs how often I received
emails by someone else?
Sincerely,
DaB.
Hello,
Am 07.11.2015 um 12:10 schrieb MFPA:
> But we *could* check to see if any of them gives
> us cause for concern.
I don’t really understand what is the earn here.
If I send a encrypted message to you and EvilPerson (together in the
same eMail), you receive the email and gpg would warn you “
Hello,
Am 26.11.2015 um 16:00 schrieb Felix Seip:
> Clearly I am doing something wrong and was wondering if someone could
> help me with this problem.
Hello,
Am 26.11.2015 um 16:00 schrieb Felix Seip:
> Clearly I am doing something wrong and was wondering if someone could
> help me with this probl
Hallo,
Am 27.11.2015 um 07:58 schrieb Werner Koch:
>> The OpenPGPKey-DNS-entry for my mail-adress works, if you like to test gpg.
> Not for me:
sorry, this is a misunderstanding. I meant: My entry is correct in the
DNS, while Felix’ is not. I have no such recent version of gpg to test
if it is wor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I'm thinking about the following scenario:
There is a smartcard with subkeys for encryption, signing and
authentication. The secret primary key is stored encrypted (eg. a
truecrypt container) and only used on an airgapped, offline machine
when si
Hello,
Am 16.12.2015 um 11:51 schrieb Fabian Stäber:
> My name has a special character. 'gpg --edit-key' shows it correctly,
> 'gpg2 --edit-key' does not.
either gpg or gpg2 show the umlaut in your key correct here. My locale
is LC_ALL=de_DE.UTF-8.
Sincerely,
DaB.
signature.asc
Description
n APT + SHA1
https://juliank.wordpress.com/2016/03/15/clarifications-and-updates-on-a
pt-sha1/
"...note that SHA1 support is not dropped, we merely do not consider it
trustworthy."
thanks!
- --
Daniel Villarreal
http://www.youcanlinux.org
youcanli...@gmail.com
PGP key 2F6E 0DC3 85E2 5EC0
is born knowing this
stuff.
Should we not strive to use gnupg v2x ? I always try to use gpg2 on
the command-line, whereas documentation seems to show gpg.
example...
Encrypting and decrypting documents
https://gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#AEN111
- --
Daniel Villarreal
http://www.youcanlinux.org
ch a big deal, so
long as I'm otherwise following best practice and using the software
as appropriately as I can, but I figure I'm on the right track by
using gpg2 on the CL.
- --
Daniel Villarreal
http://www.youcanlinux.org
youcanli...@gmail.com
PGP key 2F6E 0DC3 85E2 5EC
Hello,
Am 05.04.2016 um 06:37 schrieb Doug Barton:
> I learned to check the headers, and look for References: (sometimes
> spelled In-Reply-To:) with one or more message Ids after.
while it is off-topic: The In-Reply-to and References-header are not the
same. The in-reply-to-header tells you, for
There has been some discussion on debian-devel[1] about making a
bootable Debian Live CD specifically for GnuPG
The benefit is that everything on the CD is self-contained, it can't be
tampered with, it can run without network support in the kernel and the
workflow would be controlled by a script.
On 26/04/16 12:52, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Daniel Pocock <mailto:dan...@pocock.pro>> wrote:
>
>
> There has been some discussion on debian-devel[1] about making a
> bootable Debian Live CD specifically for GnuPG
>
>
On 26/04/16 14:16, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Daniel Pocock <mailto:dan...@pocock.pro>> wrote:
>
> Could you add a section to the wiki about this, with an itemized list of
> the tasks that need to be done, e.g.
>
> * pack
.debian.net and upload a package they created:
http://mentors.debian.net/
Regards,
Daniel
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 26/04/16 17:29, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Daniel Pocock <mailto:dan...@pocock.pro>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 26/04/16 15:40, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Robert J. Hansen <mailto:r...@s
On 27/04/16 11:53, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 22:51, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
>
>> Well, there's a little bit of a chicken-and-the-egg problem here. If
>> new projects are told "don't evangelize here", how will they let users
>> who might be interested in their project know it e
On 27/04/16 15:39, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 26/04/16 09:53, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> There has been some discussion on debian-devel[1] about making a
>> bootable Debian Live CD specifically for GnuPG
>
> I think this is interesting, and I would probably use it. But I
ent.
I often quote differently anyway...
MfG,
Daniel
- --
Daniel Villarreal
http://www.youcanlinux.org
youcanli...@gmail.com
PGP key 2F6E 0DC3 85E2 5EC0 DA03 3F5B F251 8938 A83E 7B49
https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF2518938A83E7B49
-BEGIN P
I've got this device with a built-in PIN pad:
Reiner SCT cyberJack Secoder 2 / PIN pad support?
$ lsusb -v
...
idVendor 0x0c4b Reiner SCT Kartensysteme GmbH
idProduct 0x0400
...
$ opensc-tool -l
# Detected readers (pcsc)
Nr. Card Features Name
0NoPIN pad R
I tried this with GnuPG 2.0.26 on Debian:
$ gpg2 --card-edit --batch
gpg: can't do this in batch mode
Is this supported in newer versions or can it be done with GPGME?
In particular, I would like the user to be able to do things like:
- set PINs
- set language
- set name
- set URL
On 03/05/16 15:55, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Daniel Pocock <mailto:dan...@pocock.pro>> wrote:
>
> I tried this with GnuPG 2.0.26 on Debian:
>
> $ gpg2 --card-edit --batch
> gpg: can't do this in batch mode
>
&
flash drive and copy the
signed keys back into the other system later. The other system they use
may be running 1.4.x or 2.0.x
Regards,
Daniel
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 05/05/16 08:11, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Out of curiosity, where are these rules defined?
>
> The Free Software Foundation requires them for all FSF-sponsored mailing
> lists. Thou Shalt Not Advocate Proprietary Software. I wish I had a
> link but I don't -- I was told about this Thou
rds-to-avoid.html
or some such page?
At the same time, I wouldn't want a "Chilling effect" [1]
[1] Dr.Ian Goldberg
Battling Internet censorship and surveillance
Privacy Enhancing Technologies for the Internet
Cryptography, Security, and Privacy (CrySP) Research Group
University Researc
Thanks.
I hope someone can tell me what I might be doing wrong.
> On May 7, 2016, at 3:51 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> On Fri, 6 May 2016 16:59:32 -0700
> Daniel H. Werner wrote:
>
> Hello Daniel,
>
>> I sent the following message several days ago and am not su
gnupg instead of under C:\Windows.
Any suggestions where I should look for a mistake in my configuration?
--
Best regards,
Daniel
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
stop the export of the
complete key. If there are several keys to export, gpg should still process the
other keys.
If I would have wanted to export the subkey only, I would have used the
exclamation mark syntax.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Ranft
___
Gnupg
offline
Regards,
Daniel
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Please remove me from this list.
*
Daniel H. Werner
Hillsdale Corporation
9 Oregon Yacht Club
Portland, Oregon 97202 USA
Cell: +1-503-709-0950
www.hillsdalecorp.com
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
f.) ---
ich würde das nicht tun, aber vielleicht https://www.webpg.org/ ?
- --
Daniel Villarreal
http://www.youcanlinux.org
youcanlinux at gmail.com
PGP key 2F6E 0DC3 85E2 5EC0 DA03 3F5B F251 8938 A83E 7B49
https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF2518938A83E7B49
-BEGIN PGP SIGNAT
Long-time GPG user here, thanks so much for everyone's help and work on it.
I really like the feature GPG 2.1 has, where it can serve up a subkey of a
private key to SSH and act as an SSH agent. I use a particular subkey of my
master key for SSH authentication and I really like it.
But, at
Can anybody make recommendations for a short list of card readers,
preferably with PIN pads?
I've got the SPR532[1] and found it works fine but it is no longer
listed on the vendor's web site[2], I've previously tested Reiner SCT
cyberJack Secoder 2 and found it didn't[3] work. I'm looking at
On 26/04/16 09:53, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> There has been some discussion on debian-devel[1] about making a
> bootable Debian Live CD specifically for GnuPG
>
This can now be used, command line only for the moment, as described in
my blog[1] about it
If anybody wants to he
unity be interested in collaborating as
a co-mentor on this project? If so, please feel free to email me and/or
subscribe to the pki-clean-room mailing list[3].
Regards,
Daniel
1. https://danielpocock.com/outreachy-gsoc-2017-pki-clean-room
2.
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pki-clean
I was looking at this page:
https://wiki.gnupg.org/CardReader/PinpadInput
Are any of these more outstanding than the others, or it doesn't matter
which one somebody chooses?
Could anybody comment on which of those are easily available in small
quantities for developers, or suppliers who are co
> On 10/18/2016 04:51 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I was looking at this page:
>>
>> https://wiki.gnupg.org/CardReader/PinpadInput
>>
>> Are any of these more outstanding than the others, or it doesn't matter
>> which one somebody chooses?
>>
liminate some of those from the list, is anybody
able to update the wiki?
Are there any new options that weren't listed already?
I also added another blog about choosing hardware today:
https://danielpocock.com/choosing-smartcards-readers-hardware-for-outreachy-2016
Regards,
Daniel
___
instead?
Thanks,
Daniel Ranft
gpg4o developer
--
Verschlüsseln Sie Ihre E-Mails mit gpg4o für Outlook | Encrypt your email with
gpg4o
Meinen PGP-Schlüssel finden Sie auf hkp://pgp.mit.edu. Key-ID: B8DAE2A2
Hello,
Am 20.12.2016 um 13:46 schrieb Christoph Moench-Tegeder:
> SHA1 (gnupg-2.1.17.tar.bz2) = d83ab893faab35f37ace772ca29b939e6a5aa6a7
> SHA1 (gnupg-2.1.17.tar.bz2.sig) = 34cea3e6d139cb340bf14f04ff217cb6960cf36d
>
> Or is that just me and a local issue?
it works for me (see below), but the sig-
y binding you wanted. If you really wanted to, you could
delete the second user id and signature after importing the key.
Hope this helps,
Daniel
On 24/04/2014, at 11:15 PM, helices wrote:
> Thank you, for your response.
>
> [1]
> -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
&
stood your earlier email.
I'm trying to compile a local version of GnuPG to poke around at it, but I'm
having some trouble. I'll let you know if I make any further progress.
Daniel
> I do appreciate your analysis. I hope that a GPG developer can use it to
> advance gpg.
>
I can confirm that - I compiled GnuPG against the latest version of libgcrypt
in git, and it imported the second key fine.
gpg2 --version
gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.22
libgcrypt 1.7.0-beta61
Daniel
On 25/04/2014, at 7:57 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:55, ds...@jabberwocky.com s
I had this error as well. I eventually fixed it by going with the latest stable
version of libgpg-error rather than the git HEAD.
Yours,
-- d
On 20/05/2014, at 10:56 PM, Colin Davis wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
> I'm trying to compile/test gnupg git master on OS X 10.9, but I've been
> running i
>please add a link or a comment.
Does the column "language" imply, that you are also looking for links to
non-english sites?
--
kind regards
daniel krebs
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
I recently changed my primary UID from dan...@pocock.com.au to
dan...@pocock.pro
I've been able to sign from one machine but not from another. The
second machine only has subkeys.
On the second machine, I would always get "secret key not available"
errors from git tag, signing packages, etc.
I
ht be
more attracting to new users that a rather 'cold' robot. unless you can
crate a really cute robot of course! something like wall-e from that
disney (?) picture.
--
kind regards
daniel krebs
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users
ln:
Jemand verschließt mit meinem öffentlichen Schlüssel, ich öffne mit
meinem geheimen.
Signieren:
Ich signiere mit meinem privaten Schlüssel, jemand anders überprüft mit
meinem öffentlichen.
Anregungen, Meinungen?
--
kind regards
daniel krebs
___
Gnupg-use
imprint.
https://freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/randomwalker/why-king-george-iii-can-encrypt/
--
kind regards
daniel krebs
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
t must "do something"
BEFORE anyone can send anything (secured by that means) to him. Everyone knows
what happens if you snap the lever into the lock - you're only able to unlock it
if you have the key (or a big tool, OK).
But how would you explain signing from that point of v
of
using the terms "key, lock, seal and imprint". They differentiate
between signing & encryption but are rather intuitive if you are not
familiar with the technical details of PKI.
--
kind regards
daniel krebs
___
Gnupg-users m
rget command doesn't
appear to change anything at all. Am I doing it wrong?
Any help is appreciated,
--
Daniel
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
experience with this sort of situation? I
realize that anything short of requiring a user with the passphrase at the
terminal is inherently less secure, but uptime is king, and I'm looking for
an "as secure as possible while not requiring human inte
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Grant Olson wrote:
> On 3/18/2010 7:50 AM, Daniel Eggleston wrote:
> > ..., with the ultimate goal
> > that if somebody does somehow walk out with the storage containing the
> > databases, there will be no way to gain access to the data.
&g
se at boot.
It sounds like gpg is probably not more qualified than any other encryption
tool for this job, because the solutions thrown out here are quite feasible
without gpg.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Philipp Gühring wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> > I'm trying
> > to co
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:03:30AM -0400, Jeremy Bennett wrote:
>I have been googling for an answer on how to have gpg encrypt a file to a
>file with a pgp extension. It looks like maybe the only way is via a
>output redirect (> ?). I'm trying this via a command line on a windows
>
On Sun, 30 May 2010 00:58:57 + (UTC)
"Michael D. Berger" wrote:
> On Sat, 29 May 2010 19:46:29 -0500, John Clizbe wrote:
>
> > Michael D. Berger wrote:
> >> On a Linux box, in encrypting a file with gpg, I get this query:
> >>
> >>It is NOT certain that the key belongs to the person nam
(in case the device
is stolen or confiscated). Is there ?
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:22, Kosuke Kaizuka wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Sun Jan 16 2011 14:12:42 GMT+0900, Malte Gell wrote:
>> In the Android Market there is APG.
file from our partner, I get the error
message above.
Same behavior when I enxrypt a file and try to decrypt this one directly.
Is there any mistake I oversee?
Thanks for the help
Daniel
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hello list,
I've been integrating GPG into a backup utility, and while OpenPGP
works as expected, I'm having some trouble with trying to also enable
self-signed x509 certs via gpgsm as a mechanism for encryption.
Unfortunately all I get back from gpgsm is "No Value". The output of
a gpgsm invocat
Hello list,
I was recently trying to encrypt a payload using fingerprints in my
keyring to most unambiguously identify a key, when I encountered the
following confusion. After giving up trying to find resolution via
search engine I played with it a bit more I got it to work, but the
head-scratchi
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Jerome Baum wrote:
> On 2012-01-03 02:43, Daniel Farina wrote:
>> Thoughts?
>
> --with-colons
Should that become the default? What's the use of nibbles that cannot
be parsed by --recipient?
I also prefer to read the whitespace, but in that
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 00:12, drfar...@acm.org said:
>
>> Should that become the default? What's the use of nibbles that cannot
>
> No, --with-colons is not for humans. OTOH, humans are not able to
> properly read and compare 40 digits hex string
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Jerome Baum wrote:
> Is this necessary for a technical reason? I'm just thinking about the
> scenario where transmits his human-readable fingerprint in a medium that
> collapses repeated spaces (think e.g. HTML).
If there's no security implication (it's hard for me
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:26:07 -0500
> Christopher J. Walters articulated:
>
>> It was my understanding that this bug had been fixed in Thunderbird,
>> but I may be mistaken. I know that in a GNU/Linux user mailing list
>> I have long been signed up
I understand the OpenPGP card can hold one X.509 certificate
Can this be used in practice to run an in-house CA to sign other X.509
certificates, e.g. for small VPN setups?
Also, can the X.509 cert on the OpenPGP card be used with StrongSwan (as
a client or server cert for VPN)?
I understand the OpenPGP card can hold one X.509 certificate
Can this be used in practice to run an in-house CA to sign other X.509
certificates, e.g. for small VPN setups?
Also, can the X.509 cert on the OpenPGP card be used with StrongSwan (as
a client or server cert for VPN)?
On 25/06/13 15:28, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:43, dan...@pocock.com.au said:
>> I understand the OpenPGP card can hold one X.509 certificate
> Actually the card does not hold any certifciate but merely the keys and
> OpenPGP fingerprints of the certificates. You can very well use
I understand this is a bit old, but I believe the concept is still current:
http://www.gnupg.org/howtos/card-howto/en/smartcard-howto-single.html#id2507429
Essentially, can anyone confirm why it is recommended to only store
subkeys on a smart card?
a) is it because of the risk that the card mi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/06/13 15:30, Hauke Laging wrote:
> Am Mi 26.06.2013, 15:10:19 schrieb Daniel Pocock:
>
>> Essentially, can anyone confirm why it is recommended to only store
>> subkeys on a smart card?
>
> That has little to do with sma
1 - 100 of 1127 matches
Mail list logo
