-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >> [I] use gpg2 on the [CL] whereas [doco] seems to show gpg. >> https://gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#AEN111 > > Depending ... the gnupg 2.x executable is still called 'gpg'. I > guess it depends on if the distributor wants to keep easy backwards > compatibility. On archlinux,.. only one gnupg package ... The > executable is called gpg...Regards, Viktor
"pgp --version" and "pgp2 --version" indeed showed different results on my system. Hmm. I can't help but wonder if it's such a big deal, so long as I'm otherwise following best practice and using the software as appropriately as I can, but I figure I'm on the right track by using gpg2 on the CL. - -- Daniel Villarreal http://www.youcanlinux.org youcanli...@gmail.com PGP key 2F6E 0DC3 85E2 5EC0 DA03 3F5B F251 8938 A83E 7B49 https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF2518938A83E7B49 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW+fxGAAoJEPJRiTioPntJy4oH/3B1uosavvq0B5QRk1/KBgZR hRNRV9wHnZR0BVLqfgno/6P6MvqSMsQodZ9pVyvrjgNlICZ18Yunpj8k2iFFLLUc HzRh9rba63cuvasviXhKkvcBUEuDBJMTnm1IY2yBLaUZJY4g4S3oOTOBEi8ezyNI ffSwdC9NxbfqpFncq4EFWsKOe8zZWEruAxi86C/2ubruBBO4MBBm/nsSb1na6gs6 sfb5RUMdTbiWHTukNUuaC1yaqUX///MxoJVq31ibNct6LqSmDYNVtySWkS0HcEvD C8d1BMGtDODO79ifd1GjrBvm3p88YbHyeMZh7nPtaWspUuaLBibmBxYimkzThTo= =c8Ri -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
