Hi Olav, Am 03.07.2014 14:00, schrieb Olav Seyfarth:
I'd also rather use the analogy of a "padlock without key" to be distributed by the receipient of a message. That way you're able to explain the prerequisite for asymmetric crypto as we use it in OpenPGP: the receipent must "do something" BEFORE anyone can send anything (secured by that means) to him. Everyone knows what happens if you snap the lever into the lock - you're only able to unlock it if you have the key (or a big tool, OK).
But how would you explain signing from that point of view? -- kind regards daniel krebs _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
