On Wed, 23 May 2012 07:03, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
> gpgsm: (pinentry:24664): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: Object class
> GtkSecureEntry doesn't implement property 'editing-canceled' from interface
> 'GtkCellEditable'
This warning is due to a newer version of Gtk+ (2.20). Pinentry uses a
rep
> I don't know how much the demand is (or could be) but perhaps it would help
> make more people use OpenPGP to have a round-robin email contact system.
> Whoever is willing to help new users (like in this case) registers his email
> address with the languages he's capable of communicating in. A
On Tue, 22 May 2012 21:28, steveb...@gulli.com said:
> If any of the GnuPG wizards like to chime in on the technical side on the bug
> tracker we're happy about any input.
AFAIK a Mac specific PINentry is used and not the GTK+ or QT version.
Thus I can't help.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/05/12 19:40, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 5/22/12 2:26 PM, Hauke Laging wrote:
>> Given the frequency of this discussion and the amount of effort takes by the
>> participants: Wouldn't it make sense to make this a FAQ entry?
>
> I think so, yes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/05/12 19:46, Kevin Kammer wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 08:26:14PM +0200 Also sprach Hauke Laging:
>> Given the frequency of this discussion and the amount of effort takes by the
>> participants: Wouldn't it make sense to make this a FAQ entr
As a curiosity, any ideas on what you would do to avoid use of this system for
spam purposes? (although encrypted spam won't be of much use :)
Steve wrote:
>> I don't know how much the demand is (or could be) but perhaps it
>would help
>> make more people use OpenPGP to have a round-robin emai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 22.05.2012 21:06, Robin Kipp wrote:
> Hello all, well, as of today, I finally decided to start signing my
> EMail messages using GPG to prove the integrety of my messages. As
> I am primarily using Mac OS, I downloaded MacGPG
> (http://gpgtools
On 23/05/12 11:19, Branko Majic wrote:
> As a curiosity, any ideas on what you would do to avoid use of this system
> for spam purposes? (although encrypted spam won't be of much use :)
A simple challenge-response system should suffice, I'd say. When a new user
mails to such an address, he receive
I think we had the PGP/MIME vs inline discussion already.
@Robert: Would that qualify for a second entry in your FAQ with the pro/cons
listed? I really would love to see some distilled output. The discussions on
this list are very valuable and having the pro / con arguments in some sort of
wik
Werner Koch writes:
>> gpgsm: (pinentry:24664): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: Object class
>> GtkSecureEntry doesn't implement property 'editing-canceled' from
>> interface 'GtkCellEditable'
>
> This warning is due to a newer version of Gtk+ (2.20). Pinentry uses a
> replacement of GTK+'s standard t
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-v15Nbl_zG7s/T6BFiQoGDEI/AHs/U5eU7O6MG3o/s1600/security-fail.jpg
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jerseyhttp://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 07:40:01 u
On 5/23/12 2:50 AM, Steve wrote:
> I absolutely agree. At GPGTools we thought about an automatic testing
> system. Checking if the mail was encrypted and / or signed and then
> sending out the according reply.
You may want to move this discussion over to the Enigmail list. We have
a system set up
On Wednesday 23 of May 2012 07:41:56 Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-v15Nbl_zG7s/T6BFiQoGDEI/AHs/U5eU7O6MG3o/s1
> 600/security-fail.jpg
How putting passwords to public WiFi on a wall undermines security?
If you depend on PSK WiFi for security then you've already failed
On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:27, u...@unixuser.org said:
> And it seems you already fixed it in the git repo some time ago:
Well, close to a year ;-).
> Is there any chance of new release? :-)
I will do one tomorrow.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundes
On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:30, mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com said:
> I cannot verify your signature, because you use PGP/MIME and this
> mailing list uses mailing list software which somehow messes up with
> headers and makes PGP/MIME signatures unverifiable.
It is this old Mailman/Python illness.
On Wed, 23 May 2012 15:24, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
> You may want to move this discussion over to the Enigmail list. We have
> a system set up that does much of this already, called Adele. We'd be
Is that a different one than the Adele from Gnu_PP_, which is a closed
source web service?
Sa
On 23.05.2012 12:56, Steve wrote:
> I think we had the PGP/MIME vs inline discussion already.
I am using PGP/MIME in this email. Can you verify my signature on this
email? You can find link to my public key in my signature.
Now I stop answering to these PGP/MIME vs INLINE. I think that I have
sa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23.05.2012 16:24, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 5/23/12 2:50 AM, Steve wrote:
>> I absolutely agree. At GPGTools we thought about an automatic
>> testing system. Checking if the mail was encrypted and / or
>> signed and then sending out the according
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- Original Message
Subject: The UK's cruelest cut
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 07:51:49 -0400
From: Emma Ruby-Sachs - Avaaz.org
To: da...@gbenet.com
Dear friends across the UK,
Each year, tens of thousands of girls in the UK are force
On 5/23/12 11:29 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> Is that a different one than the Adele from Gnu_PP_, which is a closed
> source web service?
I don't know. We have the source and permission to use it -- my
impression is that it's Free Software, but it's been years since I've
taken a look at our Adele co
On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:35, mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com said:
> On 23.05.2012 12:56, Steve wrote:
>> I think we had the PGP/MIME vs inline discussion already.
>
> I am using PGP/MIME in this email. Can you verify my signature on this
> email? You can find link to my public key in my signature.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23.05.2012 18:54, Werner Koch wrote:
Weird. All PGP/MIME signed emails here cannot be verified if they are
from mailing lists.
PS. I am on this list so you don't need to CC me unless your email
client forces it.
- --
[Mika Suomalainen](https://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/05/12 16:38, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> On 23.05.2012 16:24, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> On 5/23/12 2:50 AM, Steve wrote:
>>> I absolutely agree. At GPGTools we thought about an automatic
>>> testing system. Checking if the mail was encrypted and /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23.05.2012 18:54, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:35, mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com said:
>> On 23.05.2012 12:56, Steve wrote:
>>> I think we had the PGP/MIME vs inline discussion already.
>>
>> I am using PGP/MIME in this email. Can y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/05/12 16:54, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:35, mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com said:
>> On 23.05.2012 12:56, Steve wrote:
>>> I think we had the PGP/MIME vs inline discussion already.
>>
>> I am using PGP/MIME in this email. Can you
I have a draft version of nine frequently asked questions ready for
community review:
http://keyservers.org/gnupgfaq.xhtml
Note that this draft is in nicely-typeset XHTML5. This is to make it
easier to proofread. The final version that I'm going to submit to
Werner will be in plain text
On 5/23/12 11:38 AM, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> Why to move it to Enigmail list?
According to American legend, a journalist once asked the infamous bank
robber John Dillinger why he robbed banks for a living. "Because that's
where the money is," he said.
Why should a discussion about Adele move o
On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:59, mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com said:
> PS. I am on this list so you don't need to CC me unless your email
> client forces it.
Set your MFT header correctly, if you want to avoid a CC.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesge
On Wed, May 23, 2012 5:18 pm, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> I have a draft version of nine frequently asked questions ready for
> community review:
>
> http://keyservers.org/gnupgfaq.xhtml
for me the first should always be "what is gnupg ?"
regards
mick
--
keyID: 0x4BFEBB31
_
Hey David et all,
first: GPGTools Installer does indeed contain Enigmail and allows installation.
Not sure if it has the latest version since Mozilla's crazy versioning means
lots of maintenance and we couldn't find a way to automate including new
Enigmail versions. Also not sure if it is smart
On Wed, 23 May 2012 12:30:54 +0300
Mika Suomalainen wrote:
Hello Mika,
> I cannot verify your signature, because you use PGP/MIME and this
> mailing list uses mailing list software which somehow messes up with
> headers and makes PGP/MIME signatures unverifiable.
Robin's sig verifies okay here.
Mika Suomalainen <4fbd03cb.1070...@hotmail.com> May 23, 2012 12:38:40 PM
wrote:
> I am using PGP/MIME in this email. Can you verify my signature on this
> email? You can find link to my public key in my signature.
Good signature from Mika Suomalainen
Key ID: 0x82A46728 / Signed on: 5/23/12 11:35
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 05:34:16PM +0100 Also sprach michael crane:
>
> for me the first should always be "what is gnupg ?"
>
I believe these nine "new" FAQ entries are to be added to the existing
entries to provide additional information regarding keysizes
specifically. They are not comprehens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/05/12 17:34, michael crane wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 5:18 pm, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> I have a draft version of nine frequently asked questions ready for
>> community review:
>>
>> http://keyservers.org/gnupgfaq.xhtml
>
> for me t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/05/12 18:39, Steve wrote:
> Hey David et all,
>
> first: GPGTools Installer does indeed contain Enigmail and allows
> installation. Not sure if it has the latest version since Mozilla's crazy
> versioning means lots of maintenance and we could
On 5/23/12 3:07 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
> Now I have 3 Linux Laptops. I started testing Linux distros with gpg2
> - enigmail with Thunderbird - all 100 per cent Openpgp failed to
> initialise with pgp2 and in fact Openpgp always signed to my private
> key not my public key when using percipien
On May 23, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> I have a draft version of nine frequently asked questions ready for
> community review:
>
> http://keyservers.org/gnupgfaq.xhtml
>
> Note that this draft is in nicely-typeset XHTML5. This is to make it
> easier to proofread. The fin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Http://xkcd.com/538
:-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: APG v1.0.8
iQI7BAEBCgAlBQJPvPDuHhxNdXN0cnVtIDxNdXN0cnVtQE11c3RydW0ubmV0PgAK
CRBMuv2GX9WDnv71EADJYr8hgWu/5yGnKgrYHhE/w+uxieCAAtIlZDvXxHKKVFGC
MC1xVgeYeksvM8fNL4RPMCs5ttsi1uA0OUax6jGxUg7W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/05/12 20:28, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 5/23/12 3:07 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> Now I have 3 Linux Laptops. I started testing Linux distros with gpg2
>> - enigmail with Thunderbird - all 100 per cent Openpgp failed to
>> initialise with pgp
On 5/23/12 4:12 PM, David Shaw wrote:
> #1 explains why we default to 2048-bit keys, but not why RSA.
Fixed, thank you.
> The answer you have for #4 is not exactly wrong, but it is not
> complete. GnuPG doesn't support 4096-bit keys just because PGP (the
> product) does. It also supports a rang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/05/12 15:15, Mustrum wrote:
> Http://xkcd.com/538
>
> :-)
>
>
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>
Well is a wrench better
On May 23, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> I don't want to seem argumentative (especially because I haven't looked
> at the RFC lately), but I was under the impression the RFC was mostly
> silent on the subject of algorithms and key sizes -- DSA being a MUST
> algorithm, but little gui
Am Mi 23.05.2012, 12:18:49 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
> I have a draft version of nine frequently asked questions ready for
> community review:
>
> http://keyservers.org/gnupgfaq.xhtml
The reason I suggested a FAQ addition is not covered :-) At least not by the
headlines. There should be a
On Wed, 23 May 2012, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
. . .
I have a draft version of nine frequently asked questions ready for
community review:
http://keyservers.org/gnupgfaq.xhtml
Any and all feedback (save for visual design, layout, etc.) will be
gratefully accepted. Thank you!
Here FWIW
On 5/23/12 6:50 PM, reynt0 wrote:
> Also, just to mention, best to avoid smart apostrophes/quotes
> in the final version, naturally, right?
Not a whelk’s chance in a supernova. Those aren’t smart quotes, they’re
perfectly valid UTF-8 typographic marks.
"Straight quotes" and 'straight apostrophe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mustrum wrote:
> Http://xkcd.com/538
>
> :-)
I like that. It may be my passphrase is too long. I want it easier for
the black hats to crack my stuff than for them to torture my passphrase
out of me.
I recently tested a (retired) password to my compu
46 matches
Mail list logo
