Am Mi 23.05.2012, 12:18:49 schrieb Robert J. Hansen: > I have a draft version of nine frequently asked questions ready for > community review: > > http://keyservers.org/gnupgfaq.xhtml
The reason I suggested a FAQ addition is not covered :-) At least not by the headlines. There should be a paragraph "Why does GnuPG not support more than 4096 bits?". @ "Why does GnuPG use 2048-bit RSA by default?": Does the g10 smartcard not count as a reason for RSA default? @ "Has GnuPG ever been successfully attacked?" That sounds like there has never been a security problem. El-Gamal signatures, anyone? Furthermore: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2006q1/000211.html Hauke -- PGP: D44C 6A5B 71B0 427C CED3 025C BD7D 6D27 ECCB 5814
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
