-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 23/05/12 16:38, Mika Suomalainen wrote: > On 23.05.2012 16:24, Robert J. Hansen wrote: >> On 5/23/12 2:50 AM, Steve wrote: >>> I absolutely agree. At GPGTools we thought about an automatic >>> testing system. Checking if the mail was encrypted and / or >>> signed and then sending out the according reply. > >> You may want to move this discussion over to the Enigmail list. We >> have a system set up that does much of this already, called Adele. >> We'd be happy to share. > > Why to move it to Enigmail list? That email which you quoted doesn't > have mention Enigmail. As far as I know, GPGTools doesn't even include > Enigmail. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users > Yup and I was on there list too - and effectively told to shove off when I pointed out errors in enigmail - they don't like testing and error reporting - so kfuc em
David - -- “See the sanity of the man! No gods, no angels, no demons, no body. Nothing of the kind.Stern, sane,every brain-cell perfect and complete even at the moment of death. No delusion.” https://linuxcounter.net/user/512854.html - http://gbenet.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPvQlPAAoJEOJpqm7flREx71MH/AhKdugWlY764s7OaHv8EDbq 1NFHolY8ToJVBt7jTqaJCGykvmloaRwEgKjRLG4hZTvbLGQkaL3Jh7usCL9GG4FA wNEVwF69YxPjWYPjChu59nPMEFISMa0zfhiktK74tOatQQCwVHKBh6VqWoKxvvtO Dxd17EYf4LylqC8A1WLURShehh9JxC7axkMrwBlTK0h8QktFu4WnttLo43/O1A39 DMqmyaIcFnLorKVT7roEAcUIMfy1ie3Tir5L2Ct4fu/yFZ39yNXgxRh12IUCZky0 1AVlTqYw2DV3zKlMCcZ4lDXGnXMAaso8elwatv/z4zgLm0NkHyyf7q85hVx+sKg= =bglt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
