On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 09:22, Josef Wolf said:
>> Does it really need to be that hard to verify signature with a given pubkey?
That is for what gpgv was created for. Use it.
Or use the newer gpg option
--assert-signer fpr_or_file
This option checks whether at least one valid signa
On 2025-02-02 Josef Wolf wrote:
> Although I got a solution for the initial problem to use gpgv, I am still
> curious why all the other methods fail.
> Any ideas?
See below:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 12:15:18AM +0100, Josef Wolf wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am trying to verify signature of
d out
>gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>Error: building at STEP "RUN gpg --verify --trust-model always
> ql/quicklisp.lisp.asc ql/quicklisp.lisp": while running runtime: exit status 2
>
> BTW: I create an empty ~/.gnupg directory before the very firs
Josef Wolf wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 09:57:24AM +, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
>> On 30 Jan 2025, at 23:15, Josef Wolf wrote:
>>>
>>> I am trying to verify signature of downloaded files when creating a docker
>>> container. This is what I am trying to do within the Dockerfile:
>>
>> Perhap
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 09:57:24AM +, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 30 Jan 2025, at 23:15, Josef Wolf wrote:
> >
> > I am trying to verify signature of downloaded files when creating a docker
> > container. This is what I am trying to do within the Dockerfile:
>
> Perhaps it would be easier to
On 30 Jan 2025, at 23:15, Josef Wolf wrote:
>
> I am trying to verify signature of downloaded files when creating a docker
> container. This is what I am trying to do within the Dockerfile:
Hi, Josef.
Perhaps it would be easier to use gpgv?
https://www.gnupg.org/documentation/manuals/gnupg/gpg
N gpg --verify --trust-model always
ql/quicklisp.lisp.asc ql/quicklisp.lisp": while running runtime: exit status 2
BTW: I create an empty ~/.gnupg directory before the very first gpg invocation
to prevent use-keyboxd option to be set.
Does it really need to be that hard to verify signature wi
On Freitag, 14. Juni 2024 03:16:42 CEST Eason Lu via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Thank you Francesco that does help,
> I did not realize that by signing the public key, it is also mark as
> trusted, thanks
"trusted" is an ambiguous word in OpenPGP, i.e. it's use for differe
Thank you Francesco that does help,
I did not realize that by signing the public key, it is also mark as
trusted, thanks
Eason
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hello Eason,
Il 12 giugno 2024 alle 15:30 Eason Lu via Gnupg-users ha scritto:
> Hi, I am writing this email to ask for help with how to GPG trust model works.
> I have a PGP public key, key A.
> In GPG if I do gpg --edit-key A trust then set full trust (4), it is
> still shown as unk
Hi, I am writing this email to ask for help with how to GPG trust model works.
I have a PGP public key, key A.
In GPG if I do gpg --edit-key A trust then set full trust (4), it is
still shown as unknown, rather than full, is there any way to solve
this rather than marking it as 5.
Thanks
Eason
Thank you.Now a FSFE Card is read.How can I write a .pgp on virgin card?
Thank you
Il venerdì 11 novembre 2022 alle ore 15:38:08 CET, Werner Koch
ha scritto:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:58, Andrea Lenarduzzi said:
> Thank you
> gpg-connect-agent 'scd getinfo reader_list' /byeD
> 058F:9540:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:58, Andrea Lenarduzzi said:
> Thank you
> gpg-connect-agent 'scd getinfo reader_list' /byeD
> 058F:9540:X:0%0A076B:3031:X:0%0AOK
Unencoding the above list:
058F:9540:X:0
076B:3031:X:0
Thus you have two reader and you need to either use
--8<---cut here---
Am Freitag 11 November 2022 11:58:42 schrieb Andrea Lenarduzzi via
Gnupg-users:
> gpg: selecting card failed: with #reader-port 32768 and disable-ccid-driver
You probably know that -v (several times) and --debug-all
on many GnuPG binaries can greatly increase the verbosity and thus
help to
Thank you
gpg-connect-agent 'scd getinfo reader_list' /byeD
058F:9540:X:0%0A076B:3031:X:0%0AOK
but gpg --card-edit
gpg: selecting card failed: with #reader-port 32768 and disable-ccid-driver
Il venerdì 11 novembre 2022 alle ore 08:38:08 CET, Werner Koch
ha scritto:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:57, Andrea Lenarduzzi said:
> disabled-ccid-driver
I hope that is a c=P error. The option is called "disable-ccid-driver"
and not "disabled-..."
> reader-port 32768
That is a very unlikley reader port sepcification you need to use the
strings as shown by PC/SC. If you
Hi, thank you for feedback.
this is my reports:sudo systemctl status pcscd● pcscd.service - PC/SC Smart
Card Daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/pcscd.service;
indirect; preset: disabled) Active: active (running) since Thu 2022-11-10
12:50:23 CET; 1min 55s agoTriggeredBy: ● p
Hi!
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 18:10, Andrea Lenarduzzi said:
> Hi, I've a lot of problems to use gpg with OmniKey AG OMNIKEY 3x21
> and Alcor Micro Corp. AU9540. gpg: selecting card failed
Better get a solid reader and not those Windows reader which delegate
parts of their duties in their Windows dri
Hi, I've a lot of problems to use gpg with OmniKey AG OMNIKEY 3x21 and Alcor
Micro Corp. AU9540. gpg: selecting card failed
I'm on Manjaro rolling with Gnome 42.4
Can you help me to troubleshooting?
Than you regards
Uzzi___
Gnupg-users ma
First of all, thank you for taking your time to reply to this email. I
tried it using the -l flag. The config file was found in the directory
before that. Below is the command I executed.
I don't want to sound dismissive or discouraging, but you may want to
consider whether you have the necessa
me in the right direction?
Yes, you should remove the copy of mpi.h you made in
/home/user/Desktop/gnupg-1.4.13; that is not how you make libraries
available to C compilations. Try
-I/home/user/Desktop/gnupg-1.4.13/include instead of copying mpi.h.
If you are having to ask for help with
7;d really like to see your email
> refuse to read HTML email, on the grounds that it's a security risk.
> I've quoted your entire message below as plaintext to help you reach
> these people.
>
> To resolve your problem I'd suggest finding where the Automake-created
>
You will have much better luck if you send only plain-text emails to
this list. Some of the people you'd really like to see your email
refuse to read HTML email, on the grounds that it's a security risk.
I've quoted your entire message below as plaintext to help you reach
the
Core(TM) i5-8250U CPU @ 1.60GHz processor.
I tried it on WSL and on Ubuntu 20.04 installed on dual boot.
1. What might be the reason ?
2. How can I rectify this error ?
Any help would be highly appreciated.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 21:12, Arjun said:
> I have GPG_TTY=$(tty) set in my .bashrc. However, when I ssh in
>
> ssh remote
By default ssh does not allow X forwarding. You need to use an extra
option to ssh to allow X programs on the remote to work on your (local)
X-server.
A quick test is to
Hi
I have a very basic gnupg setup on a remote server, with the following options
set for the gpg-agent. Please cc me on the replies since I have not subscribed.
#pinentry-program /usr/bin/pinentry-curses
#pinentry-program /usr/bin/pinentry-tty
#pinentry-program /usr/bin/pinentry-qt
#pinentry-pr
Hi Erich,
Am Freitag, 22. Oktober 2021, 19:17:07 CEST schrieb Erich Eckner via Gnupg-
users:
> There are two parts of the usage: The publishing part and the
> search-for-and-use-if-available part. Both need separate measurements, I
> think.
Yes, though we want to focus on the latter part.
> >
data is saved.
So it is just about the safety of the decryption tool, which can be provided.
Do you know email addresses, e.g. of mailinglists, where you know the server
administrators would be potentially willing to help this academic research?
An other ideas?
If you want to fiddle around
both counts, no personal data is saved.
So it is just about the safety of the decryption tool, which can be provided.
Do you know email addresses, e.g. of mailinglists, where you know the server
administrators would be potentially willing to help this academic research?
An other ideas?
Best Regards
On Samstag, 30. Januar 2021 00:22:11 CET John Scott via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Saturday, January 23, 2021 10:39:30 AM EST Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > Did you have a look at GPGME's tests as working example code? There is a
> > test for listing signatures:
> > https://dev.gnupg.org/source/gpgme/browse/
On Saturday, January 23, 2021 10:39:30 AM EST Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> Did you have a look at GPGME's tests as working example code? There is a
> test for listing signatures:
> https://dev.gnupg.org/source/gpgme/browse/master/tests/gpg/t-keylist-sig.c
Thanks, I didn't see that. Except for the differen
On Samstag, 23. Januar 2021 04:11:53 CET John Scott via Gnupg-users wrote:
> I'm having trouble writing a program using GPGME that is able to read the
> signatures of keys from a file. I've ensured that GPGME_KEYLIST_MODE_SIGS is
> specified and would appreciate additional eyeballs on it. I've test
I'm having trouble writing a program using GPGME that is able to read the
signatures of keys from a file. I've ensured that GPGME_KEYLIST_MODE_SIGS is
specified and would appreciate additional eyeballs on it. I've tested it with
the Debian keyring which has many signatures and not had any luck.
The readers as I've shown is a REINERST Cyberjack RFID Standard, and the driver
pcsc_lite.
Indeed I am running pcsc, in my first message I've even posted it's debug log.
Thanks,
22h49
Nov 16, 2020, 16:06 by w...@gnupg.org:
> On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 21:28, 22h39 said:
>
>> The problem lies in Pin
On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 21:28, 22h39 said:
> The problem lies in Pinentry which for some reason can't hande ccid
> pin requests on the contactless interface, after this fix the
Which reader and which ccid driver are you using? I assume that you are
running pcscd, right?
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
-
Problem resolved! look at my last reply to Juergen to find the solution.
Thanks to everyone,
22h49
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
if another OpenPGP implementation does support
> smartcards/token.
> This was already a big issue with Mozilla's Thunderbird 78 and it's native
> implementation of OpenPGP instead of Enigmail.
>
> Sorry that I can't help in a better way!
>
> best regards and a gr
it's
native implementation of OpenPGP instead of Enigmail.
Sorry that I can't help in a better way!
best regards and a great weekend
Juergen
--
/¯\ No |
\ / HTML |Juergen Bruckner
Xin |juergen@bruckner.email
/ \ Mail |
Am 14.11.20 um 20:08 schrieb 22h39 via G
t and OpenKeychain on my phone, the problem here is created by GPG in
conjunction with the reader.
Thanks for help,
22h49
Nov 14, 2020, 19:58 by gnupg-users@gnupg.org:
> What kind of OpenPGP card do you use?
> The OpenPGP Smart Card V3.3 + MiFare DESFire [1] don't support PGP operat
to the computer.
Looking at the logs, the card exchanges exactly the same apdus when using the
contact and contactless interface so all points to some weird bug in gpg.
Thanks for help,
22h49
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://
ontact and contactless interface so all points to some weird bug in gpg.
Thanks for help,
22h49
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 11:22, Juergen Bruckner said:
> As far as I know the OpenPGP function of the OpenPGP-Card cannot be
> used via NFC / RFID. You need to use the on card chip and a card
In fact GnuPG does not support secure messaging and thus using the
contactless interface iwould be a security
Hello 22h49
Am 13.11.20 um 20:22 schrieb 22h39 via Gnupg-users:
I have been for the life of me unable to get gpg working with the contactless
interface in my reader.
How to reproduce:
I'm using a REINERSCT Cyberjack standard RFID dual interface class 3 reader
Simply take a Openpgp card and
I have been for the life of me unable to get gpg working with the contactless
interface in my reader.
How to reproduce:
I'm using a REINERSCT Cyberjack standard RFID dual interface class 3 reader
Simply take a Openpgp card and try to sign anything using the contactless
interface.
The drivers
Ok, thank you.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020, 9:30 AM Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:59, Mike said:
> > I had to recover gnupg file from a corrupted os. The contents of the
> gnupg
> > file are encrypted and are not in openpgp data. So when I try to import
> my
> > keys from 'private-keys-v1
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:59, Mike said:
> I had to recover gnupg file from a corrupted os. The contents of the gnupg
> file are encrypted and are not in openpgp data. So when I try to import my
> keys from 'private-keys-v1.d' nothing happens. Output says no openpgp data
> found and 0 items processed.
enpgp data
found and 0 items processed.
Same goes for the keyring.kbx files... nothing imports.
I've gone through everything I can find online.. somebody please help me...
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman
Sent from my iPhone
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ng these commands; hopefully you see an
> error message.
Thank you. The extra logging and options didn't reveal anything insightful to
me (attached). I've also adjusted the credentials after getting help in my
organization.
I notice that if I use a non-SSL port like 389 or 3268—whic
Hi Cyrus,
1. This is the SHA256 checksum I get for GnuPG-2.2.20.dmg:
39970099819616d4b66a4e471ce26db97384948d0f375e02aae9d9de1d69baa5
2. The signature (GnuPG-2.2.20.dmg.sig) checked out for me:
gpg: Signature made Sat Mar 21 12:42:46 2020 CET
gpg:using RSA key 4F9F89F5505AC1D1A2
On 2020-05-23 at 03:42 -0400, Cyrus Segura via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
> I'm new to GnuPG. I'm trying to install it for MacOSX, and I have a
> beginner's question.
>
>
> ***Do I need to verify more information about the validity of GnuPG
> if:
>
>
> 1.) The SHA-256 checksum on m
Hi everyone,
I'm new to GnuPG. I'm trying to install it for MacOSX, and I have a
beginner's question.
***Do I need to verify more information about the validity of GnuPG if:
1.) The SHA-256 checksum on my Mac's Terminal matches the one on
SourceForge where the Mac installer (.dmg) file is?
2.)
--
verbose
log-file socket://
debug ipc,lookup,extprog
no-use-tor
--8<---cut here---end--->8---
(if you are not using watchgnupg, repalce socket:// by a regular file name)
This gives more specifc debug output. (BTW, "dirmngr --debug help" shows
all deb
apservers.conf reads
ads.foo.com:636:ads\jscott:PassPhrase:ou=Accounts,dc=ads,dc=foo,dc=com
and to be extra safe I've put an explicit no-use-tor and ldapserverlist-file
dirmngr_ldapservers.conf in my dirmngr.conf. Reloading dirmngr and gpgsm after
getting on the VPN doesn't help.
Looking u
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:59, Phil Pennock said:
> On Unix, it's done with "pinentry", I don't know Windows so don't know
> the details there. But hopefully this provides enough to point you in
On Windows we can't make it 100% sure that the Pinentry pops up above
the other windows. In some cases i
Hi Phil,
Thank you for your response , please see this screen shot it has both keys.
[cid:image001.png@01D5F06B.E0CB6290]
I have imported secret key but still getting same error message , can you
please help on this.
Thanks,
Srikanth Gubba
-Original Message-
From: Phil
On 2020-03-02 at 14:23 +, Gubba, Srikanth (HNI Corp) wrote:
> Thank you for your response , please see this screen shot it has both keys.
> I have imported secret key but still getting same error message , can you
> please help on this.
Oh, I didn't look closely enough at th
ELG key, ID 7E5B6A6AB3392A8D, created 2018-06-12
> "HNICorp "
> gpg: public key decryption failed: Timeout
> gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
>
> I have imported my private and public key and trusted ultimately but still
> getting same error message . Can you please
or message . Can you please help me on this.
Thanks,
Srikanth Gubba
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Stefan Claas wrote:
>
> > Due to a lenghtly discussion in Usenet, with native English speakers,
> > I decided againt an English version and will go instead for NATO/HEX,
> > which allows for faster and error free transfer via phone, radio, etc.
>
> Here is a
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > Let's assume the following...
>
> Let's not assume anything. You either have users in such conditions or
> you don't. Design for the users you do have, not the hypothetical users
> you imagine having. I can tell you from bitter experience, hypothetical
> users virtu
> Let's assume the following...
Let's not assume anything. You either have users in such conditions or
you don't. Design for the users you do have, not the hypothetical users
you imagine having. I can tell you from bitter experience, hypothetical
users virtually never appear in real life. The
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > I don't agree with you, because due to dialects spoken in every
> > country (even in the US) the PGP wordlist is not suitable IMHO
> > for non-native English speakers and international comms, which
> > the NATO alphabet is perfect for!
>
> It was designed by a computat
> I don't agree with you, because due to dialects spoken in every
> country (even in the US) the PGP wordlist is not suitable IMHO
> for non-native English speakers and international comms, which
> the NATO alphabet is perfect for!
It was designed by a computational linguist specifically to be res
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > Due to a lenghtly discussion in Usenet, with native English
> > speakers, I decided againt an English version and will go instead for
> > NATO/HEX, which allows for faster and error free transfer via phone,
> > radio, etc.
>
> You can do a *lot* better than that. This
> Due to a lenghtly discussion in Usenet, with native English
> speakers, I decided againt an English version and will go instead for
> NATO/HEX, which allows for faster and error free transfer via phone,
> radio, etc.
You can do a *lot* better than that. This is a solved problem.
https://en.wik
Stefan Claas wrote:
> Due to a lenghtly discussion in Usenet, with native English speakers,
> I decided againt an English version and will go instead for NATO/HEX,
> which allows for faster and error free transfer via phone, radio, etc.
Here is an output from a small encrypted NaCl secretbox blob
Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Ajax wrote:
>
> > Are there enough five letter words in the word lists available at
> > eff.org/dice?
>
> Thanks a lot! The short list has 782 five letter words, perfect!
>
> So I will then select 256 of them which are easy (for me) to
> read ... :-)
Due t
Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Ajax wrote:
>
> > Are there enough five letter words in the word lists available at
> > eff.org/dice?
>
> Thanks a lot! The short list has 782 five letter words, perfect!
>
> So I will then select 256 of them which are easy (for me) to
> read ... :-)
O.k.,
Ajax wrote:
> Are there enough five letter words in the word lists available at
> eff.org/dice?
Thanks a lot! The short list has 782 five letter words, perfect!
So I will then select 256 of them which are easy (for me) to
read ... :-)
Best regards
Stefan
--
box: 4a64758de9e8ceded2c481ee526440
Hi all,
I was wondering if native English speakers can help me out in finding 'the
right' 5 letter words which can be used in an binary to words encoder/decoder,
which then can be used with GnuPG encrypted binary files, so that these
(preferably small binary blobs) messages can then be
Hello,
After a successful ./configure of libgpg-error-1.36, the subsequent make failed
with the error below.
capplmgr@orafind: /fin3/app/app/capplmgr/mlc-rot/gnupg/libgpg-error-1.36> make
make all-recursive
Making all in m4
Target "all" is up to date.
Making all in src
make all
Hi Werner,
You hit the nail on the head.
Looks like CFLAGS was indeed set by another script that is run automatically
after login. After ensuring that script is not run. The compile error I was
experience went away.
Thanks very much for your help.
Regards,
Reynaldo Abeleda
Senior Analyst
On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 02:36, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
> configure:3554: error: C compiler cannot create executables
configure does an early test to see whether your C compiler works. This
is done to detect crippled compilers delivered on some systems. Seems
not the case here, though.
> config
Hi,
I am new to GnuPG and have recently subscribed to this mailing list to access
to help from the GnuPG user community.
I downloaded GnuPG and required libraries and am attempting build of the first
required package npth-1.6.
The ./configure step failed with the below error.
configure:3552
Hi,
I am new to GnuPG and have recently subscribed to this mailing list to access
to help from the GnuPG user community.
I downloaded GnuPG and required libraries and am attempting build of the first
required package npth-1.6.
The ./configure step failed with the below error.
configure:3552
Hi,
I've been using gnupg just fine for a while (gpg, then moved to gpg2,
created new keys), mostly to encrypt/sign password using the pass (zx2c4)
passwordstore.
Then all of a sudden things broke and I cannot decrypt things, even though
keys are apparently there ...
I'd appreciate so
On Feb-23-19, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 23/02/2019 12:43, Chris Coutinho wrote:
I'm not exactly sure what the difference is between that and a fingerprint
A key's fingerprint is something specific to OpenPGP. It includes
OpenPGP-specific information and formats. As such, it is undefined for
an O
On 2019-02-23 12:43, Chris Coutinho wrote:
> On Feb-22-19, swedebugia wrote:
snip
>>
>
>> enable-ssh-support
>
>> 7338C1836152D95BBCEFF33F45C49516CC810826
>
>> ___
>> Gnupg-users mailing list
>> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
>> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/
On 23/02/2019 12:43, Chris Coutinho wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure what the difference is between that and a fingerprint
A key's fingerprint is something specific to OpenPGP. It includes
OpenPGP-specific information and formats. As such, it is undefined for
an OpenSSH key or a CMS (X.509) key; it s
On Feb-22-19, swedebugia wrote:
Hi
I'm quite a beginner to gnupg.
I would like to have a master key used for both encrypting documents
and mail and a subkey of that used for SSH.
Following this
https://incenp.org/notes/2015/gnupg-for-ssh-authentication.html
I first set up the keys:
sec
Hi
I'm quite a beginner to gnupg.
I would like to have a master key used for both encrypting documents and
mail and a subkey of that used for SSH.
Following this
https://incenp.org/notes/2015/gnupg-for-ssh-authentication.html
I first set up the keys:
sec ed25519/CFCD435B280B6CD2
cre
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 17:54:26 +0100, Juergen BRUCKNER wrote:
Hi Juergen,
> the ex- and import of the keys at commandline in terminal works fine.
>
> But I wanted to make screenshots of the process for a presentation i
> would use for a training of "newbies" and there i under no
> circumstances wa
Hi Stefan,
the ex- and import of the keys at commandline in terminal works fine.
But I wanted to make screenshots of the process for a presentation i
would use for a training of "newbies" and there i under no circumstances
want to work in terminal or commandline interface.
And i could reproduce
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 14:52:14 +0100, Juergen Bruckner wrote:
> Hello Groups,
>
> I do this as crossposting on gnupg and enigmail - lists.
>
> Raspian: November 2018 (Kernel 4.4)
> Thunderbird: 52.9.1 - 32bit
> Enigmail 2.0.8 (20180804-1515)
> all installed from the Raspbian-sources
>
> At the mom
Hello Groups,
I do this as crossposting on gnupg and enigmail - lists.
Raspian: November 2018 (Kernel 4.4)
Thunderbird: 52.9.1 - 32bit
Enigmail 2.0.8 (20180804-1515)
all installed from the Raspbian-sources
At the moment I try to etablish a "Backup-Mail-Client" on a RaspberryPi
with Thunderbird,
Dear GNUPGs,
I have strange troubles with my key.
I DO can decrypt encrypted files that other people prepared for
me, using the public part of my key for encryption. Public key
attached to this message.
I canNOT decrypt files that were m
Dear GNUPGs,
I have strange troubles with my key.
I DO can decrypt encrypted files that other people prepared for
me, using the public part of my key for encryption. Public key
attached to this message.
I canNOT decrypt files that were m
Hi,
On Friday, May 11, 2018 10:27:34 AM CEST arinit wrote:
> Requesting inputs from anyone , if you have faced any issues on GPG
decryption which is done uninteractively
>
> The version used is : gpg (GnuPG) Version: 2.2.4 / libgcrypt 1.8.2 windows
> And automated job is scheduled from contro
arinit:
>gpg --debug-all -vvv --batch --pinentry-mode loopback --passphrase-file -o
>“ouputfile” --yes –decrypt “file to decrypt”
Doesn't »--passphrase-file« need an argument, does it? If so,
gpg looks for a passphrase file named »-o«.
Friedhelm
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello ,
Requesting inputs from anyone , if you have faced any issues on GPG decryption
which is done uninteractively
The version used is : gpg (GnuPG) Version: 2.2.4 / libgcrypt 1.8.2 windows
And automated job is scheduled from controlM to run on a Windows Edition -
Windows Server 2016 Data
There was a post recently which introduced NetPGP. Is there
someone who has used it successfully to verify the signiture
on a binary file? I could use help on how to form a working
command line.
I tried `netpgpverify -k ~/.gnupg/pubring.gpg gnupg-1.4.22.tar.bz2.sig`
in a directory containing
Hi.
What are you trying to do?
Do you just want to transfer you public key via email or anything like
that?
Then try:
gpg2 -a --eyport > filename.asc
This gives you an ascii armored key that you can transfer in any way
you want.
Regards,
Dirk
Am Sonntag, den 14.01.2018, 22:57 + schrieb
I#m trying to convert it into an alrogrithim by opening it with the note pad so
I can purchase, but it doesn’t change it into the correct one so that other
people know my certification? How do I change my public file into a format that
I can ive to other users?
sudo process (when
I re-enabled systemd's handling of gpg-agent).
But machinectl seems to be for containers. I'd rather not go
there since it might not be right since I'm not using
containers. It seems like a hack.
I think this is just another argument/example to support my
prefere
On Sun 2018-01-07 23:23:16 +1100, gn...@raf.org wrote:
> For the actual decryption, I'm using sudo. From the original
> post, the command to set things up contains something like:
>
> /usr/bin/screen -- \
> /usr/bin/sudo -u thing --set-home -- \
> /usr/bin/gpg-agent --homedir /etc/thing/.gnup
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Thu 2017-12-21 16:19:00 +1100, raf wrote:
> > Sorry, I thought I already did. The 4th point above does not
> > work. When the public-facing host connects via ssh to the
> > key management host, and runs gpg, instead of it successully
> > connecting to the existing g
On Thu 2017-12-21 16:19:00 +1100, raf wrote:
> Sorry, I thought I already did. The 4th point above does not
> work. When the public-facing host connects via ssh to the
> key management host, and runs gpg, instead of it successully
> connecting to the existing gpg-agent process that I started
> minu
that will be
> > making the connections to the server with the keys (and the data). I
> > don't want their rebooting to be delayed by my having to log in to
> > each of them with a passphrase or a forwarded gpg-agent connection. I
> > want them to make the connection by
ta they need, and continue booting up.
Here, i think you're making an efficiency argument -- you want to
prepare the "key management" host in advance, so that during the boot
process of the public-facing service, it gets what it needs without
you needing to manipulate it directly.
&
1 - 100 of 618 matches
Mail list logo
