> Out of curiosity, where are these rules defined?
The Free Software Foundation requires them for all FSF-sponsored mailing
lists. Thou Shalt Not Advocate Proprietary Software. I wish I had a
link but I don't -- I was told about this Thou Shalt Not Advocate
Proprietary Software rule by a mem
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Pete Stephenson wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Robert J. Hansen
> wrote:
> > Dashamir, this list has very few rules. I'm grateful for that, really.
> > One of the few rules that must be obeyed, though, is "we will not
> > advocate non-libre software or
Paul Applegate was kind enough to point me at:
https://blog.cloudflare.com/empty-ddos-threats-meet-the-armada-collective/
TL;DR version: there's no evidence these people can back up their threat
with action, but they've still been making a ton of money from their
victims. There are a lot of peop
> > > This UK legislation will have impact elsewhere.
Too many wind mills, too little time ;-)
- The world has excess ignorant "Regulate Crypto" politicians &
& civil servants paid to push laws.
- National cryptography vendors, systems houses, banks etc may have more
commercial interest to fun
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Dashamir, this list has very few rules. I'm grateful for that, really.
> One of the few rules that must be obeyed, though, is "we will not
> advocate non-libre software or products here".
Out of curiosity, where are these rules defined?
I just received this at my Enigmail address. I'm posting this publicly
because I side with Rudyard Kipling, who wrote:
"And that is called paying the Dane-geld;
But we've proved it again and again,
That if once you have paid him the Dane-geld
You never get rid of the Dane!
Hello!
I need help with GnuPG 2.1.12 migrating an encryption tool from 1.4.20.
I'm trying to run the --delete-secret-and-public-key command with the
passphrase entered through stdin, which doesn't get activated ('delete
key failed: No pinentry'). With --export-secret-keys I was successful
this w
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 11:15:47PM +0100, MFPA wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
> On Wednesday 4 May 2016 at 6:04:55 PM, in
> , keith wrote:
> > Personally I almost realise that
> > some of this may be
> > needed and/or indeed necessary
> By contrast, I am 100% certain th
> There is this scary project listing several hundreds factored pgp/rsa
> keys: http://trilema.com/2016/the-phuctoring/
Not scary. Not all that interesting, either. It's also been discussed
on this list before. This group claims to have access to my secret key.
I posted a 256-bit random sequen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wednesday 4 May 2016 at 6:04:55 PM, in
, keith wrote:
> Personally I almost realise that
> some of this may be
> needed and/or indeed necessary
By contrast, I am 100% certain that none of it is needed. If "the
authorities" think they need ac
> I do not advertise, I expess my opinion.
Dashamir, this list has very few rules. I'm grateful for that, really.
One of the few rules that must be obeyed, though, is "we will not
advocate non-libre software or products here".
If you want to host your project on GitHub, go for it! Nobody will
c
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> I do not advertise, I expess my opinion.
Please keep you it to yourself, then. Your provocative,
passive-aggressive communication style is outrageous and
disrespectful.
___
Gnupg-users mailing lis
On Wed, 4 May 2016 21:12, dashoho...@gmail.com said:
> However, "e pur si muove", it still is great, the truth cannot be hidden.
I asked you not to do this on this list. There are enough other ways to
express OT opinions; look fur such opportunities.
Please do us all a favor and stick to the n
There is this scary project listing several hundreds factored pgp/rsa
keys: http://trilema.com/2016/the-phuctoring/
Quote:
"This find exposes significant vulnerabilities in the OpSec practices of
each and every organisation or institution mentioned. The Pirate Party,
German users, something callin
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 4 May 2016 12:16, dashoho...@gmail.com said:
>
> > Git is great, GitHub is greater.
>
> I would appreciate if you do not advertise proprietary services here.
>
I do not advertise, I expess my opinion.
Do you think that I am affiliated
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 4 May 2016 12:16, dashoho...@gmail.com said:
>>
>> > Git is great, GitHub is greater.
>>
>> I would appreciate if you do not advertise proprietary services here.
>>
>
> I do n
.. I should really sort out which e-mails I have a clue about..
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 16:30 +0100, Steve Karmeinsky wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 03:38:18PM +0100, keith wrote:
>
> > This UK legislation will have impact elsewhere.
>
> Currently encryption isn't banned, however say you encrypt
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 03:38:18PM +0100, keith wrote:
> This UK legislation will have impact elsewhere.
Currently encryption isn't banned, however say you encrypt an email and
send it to someone and the 'authorities' want to read it, they can then
force you to hand over the keys and if you refus
Hello!
The GnuPG team is pleased to announce the availability of a new release
of GnuPG modern: Version 2.1.12. See below for new features and bug
fixes.
The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) is a complete and free implementation
of the OpenPGP standard which is commonly abbreviated as PGP.
GnuPG allow
Hi Johannes,
Am Mittwoch, 4. Mai 2016 10:18:04 schrieb Johannes Nix:
> https://github.com/jnxx/check-trustpaths
>
> I'd be happy to hear whether it is working for you
> and where it can be improved.
I like the idea, I'll probably try it once I have a need for the use case.
Maybe you can add a lin
Feel free to ignore me.
As you may know the UK Government is attempting to update or otherwise
consolidate its legislation in respect of access to Communications and
Other Data for the purposes of law enforcement. In part that is what
raised my interest in encryption and caused me to join this lis
Hi Webmaster,
just noticed that the information about our community mailinglist is a bit
inconsistent.
http://lists.gnupg.org/
does not list a number of relevant
mailinglists like gnupg-de and gnupg-commits.
I suggest to scratch the http://lists.gnupg.org/ page and redirect it to
https://gnupg.
On Wed, 4 May 2016 12:16, dashoho...@gmail.com said:
> Git is great, GitHub is greater.
I would appreciate if you do not advertise proprietary services here.
Those who really want such a centralized service may eant to check out
gitlab.com, which seems to repect user freedom better. See also
h
On 04/05/16 12:16, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> GitHub provides issue/project management features on top of Git.
> For example it will notify me when new issues are created, when
> pull requests are merged, when new releases are made, etc.
Debian has its own infrastructure for that. In fact, the Git re
On 04/05/16 12:22, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Given the Live CD is a clean room, isolated, will the file format
> compatibility issues will be relevant?
To the best of my knowledge, this would indeed not pose a problem at all.
Note that exporting a private key with 2.1 prompts the user to enter the
On 05/03/2016 09:04 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I've got this device with a built-in PIN pad:
>
> Reiner SCT cyberJack Secoder 2 / PIN pad support?
>
>
> $ lsusb -v
> ...
> idVendor 0x0c4b Reiner SCT Kartensysteme GmbH
> idProduct 0x0400
If I understand correctly, this dev
On 04/05/16 11:55, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 4 May 2016 11:40, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
>
>> Werner, would you recommend they use 2.1 or 2.0 for the Debian Live CD?
>
> 2.1 of course
>
I already raised the topic of using 2.1, there is some feedback about it
in the bug tracker, especi
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Peter Lebbing
wrote:
> On 03/05/16 22:31, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> > Is it on GitHub (so that I can watch you)?
>
> From [1]: the project is in Git, but not on GitHub.
GitHub provides issue/project management features on top of Git.
For example it will notify me
On Wed, 4 May 2016 11:40, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
> Werner, would you recommend they use 2.1 or 2.0 for the Debian Live CD?
2.1 of course
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
___
Gnupg-user
I wrote a small tool for automatically retrieving
and checking trust paths between two PGP keys.
This was motivated by me experiencing difficulty when verifying
signed Linux distribution images or downloads for web software
using GnuPG. The PGP Pathfinder Service provided by Henk P.
Penning allo
On 04/05/16 08:13, Werner Koch wrote:
> There is also --quick-gen-key:
>
> [...]
>
> Well, 2.1 creates a revocation certifciate with the key.
Werner, would you recommend they use 2.1 or 2.0 for the Debian Live CD?
Cheers,
Peter.
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigma
On 03/05/16 22:31, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> Is it on GitHub (so that I can watch you)?
>From [1]: the project is in Git, but not on GitHub. You can browse the
repository on the web at [2], and you can clone it to your local hard
disk with:
git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/m
Hi all,
Am to trying to encrypt & sign a file without using the terminal from SAP using
the following command.
--no-tty --recipient --encrypt --sign --default-key /SAP
/input/PPID.TXT
The above command resulted with the following error
gpg: no default secret key: No secret key
gpg: [stdin
33 matches
Mail list logo
