-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On Wednesday 4 May 2016 at 6:04:55 PM, in <mid:1462381495.2764.63.camel@keith>, keith wrote: > Personally I almost realise that > some of this may be > needed and/or indeed necessary By contrast, I am 100% certain that none of it is needed. If "the authorities" think they need access to some specific group or individual's communications, they can employ plain old-fashioned deception to have undercover agents worm their way in and get themselves trusted and included in the encryption list. - -- Best regards MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> Editing is a rewording activity -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJXKnSUXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZBNUEwRjU2 QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXw1scH/17gSYP8Lp4tt+JyBDEPFv+B 9oMEjIYgWy33fL5tuIpOZVvwLrkBIbwmUv7NmcHjudIZkusp+iCcuE0o9rk/k7nm 0PYEZOgWUSsh1FCbcYJvh3CRqYVsj9UdRnQv0SjSEzWiyntV1Kt4PpXCziPO9hEt zyBDEJaNhfTWKAyrnf4IL2BQfmBCSHuEQ2Z5d4W//zpWz2nQvecCZhJoTJJqzzYN azVZY6LnTh3kIEWGWIX102h7ysomserDVBa5d6UkcCZpU7mGi8clekXTfT0SkT3x sCzd7aDtUvkLnE0sYv06SXx1nwNYvch6PqjHl1iOiGMGjK2iw7iyo7cLzIEMIFKI vgQBFgoAZgUCVyp0lF8UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MzNBQ0VENEVFOTEzNEVFQkRFNkE4NTA2MTcx MkJDNDYxQUY3NzhFNAAKCRAXErxGGvd45PPkAQD+3bWvLVUwitqeR3Z1ffGglzcW GeojR/Gh5ZM3ybiy+QEAr/SR/pa4QCQP+G94NkDeJk86gBowwhgGntlHld4VcQ0= =J0rX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
