Matthias Clasen wrote:
On 12/21/05, Abel Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 12/22/05, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323956
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
The first bug complains about the fact that the "(_
On 27/12/2005, at 1:54 AM, Raphael Higino wrote:
Can't you use decomposed form? I.e. "_Álbum" (Pango should[1] still
show it the same, though it's in practice of a bit worse appearance
depending on the font; for reference, I used combining acute U+0301
after "A" here).
Yes, I could. But I st
On 12/21/05, Abel Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,On 12/22/05, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323956
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104112>> The first bug complains about the fact that the "(_F)" form in which
> many CJK strin
må 2005-12-26 klockan 13:58 -0200 skrev Raphael Higino:
> Perhaps in other languages worldwide A and Á are completely different.
In Finnish and Swedish, Å, Ä, and Ö are considered completely distinct
letters. No Swedish or Finnish speaker would think of them as A or O
with some "accent" attached.
On 12/27/05, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/21/05, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 04:22 +0800, Abel Cheung wrote:
> > > I see. Something like "gl_[u]ücklich", so pressing alt-u can activate the
> > > item?
> >
> > Exactly
>
> Actually, what
> > I can't use Á as the accelerator since it requires multiple keystrokes.
>
> Can't you use decomposed form? I.e. "_Álbum" (Pango should[1] still
> show it the same, though it's in practice of a bit worse appearance
> depending on the font; for reference, I used combining acute U+0301
> after "A
Yesterday at 12:34, Raphael Higino wrote:
> I can't use Á as the accelerator since it requires multiple keystrokes.
Can't you use decomposed form? I.e. "_Álbum" (Pango should[1] still
show it the same, though it's in practice of a bit worse appearance
depending on the font; for reference, I use
On 12/21/05, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 04:22 +0800, Abel Cheung wrote:
> > cation that the accel key is "x" not "o"?
> > >
> > > No, but the use case for this is probably situations where the user
> > > understand that the underlined 'o' means that he has to
> This is a compromise that would also work for Vietnamese, since we
> have a preponderance of dead-key-accented vowels. But how will we
> make sure the user knows which key to press?
I think it won't be a big deal. At least here in Brazil users tend to think
computers interpret characters with an
On 25/12/2005, at 3:53 PM, Clytie Siddall wrote:
This is a compromise that would also work for Vietnamese, since we
have a preponderance of dead-key-accented vowels. But how will we
make sure the user knows which key to press?
Correction: there are several keyboard layouts/input methods fo
On 24/12/2005, at 10:04 PM, Raphael Higino wrote:
I see. Something like "gl_[u]ücklich", so pressing alt-u can
activate the
item?
But this one, it really shows an important use of this feature. It
would
really help me with some translations in order to make some
accelerators
more intu
Hi, folks.
> > > One question not entirely related: let's say "f_[x]oo", is there
> > > any hint or visual indication that the accel key is "x" not "o"?
This example leads us to thinking such feature would never be used or be
intuitive.
> > No, but the use case for this is probably situations wh
This is not the same problem, but the topic is the same.
Although Vietnamese uses a Roman alphabet, the meaning in words is
differentiated by tones. We also have several additional vowel sounds
which the normal Roman alphabet can't represent. This results in a
system of combined diacritics,
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 04:22 +0800, Abel Cheung wrote:
> cation that the accel key is "x" not "o"?
> >
> > No, but the use case for this is probably situations where the user
> > understand that the underlined 'o' means that he has to press the x
> > key. E.g. if there is a standard input method whi
On 12/22/05, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have a number of questions here:
> > > - Does this sound like a reasonable thing to do ? (the risk of
> > > accidentally stripping something thats not an accelerator is
> > > probably minimal, but not 0.
> >
> > Indeed, there can b
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 03:47 +0800, Abel Cheung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/22/05, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323956
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
> >
> > The first bug complains about the fact that the "(_F)" form in w
Hi,
On 12/22/05, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323956
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
>
> The first bug complains about the fact that the "(_F)" form in which
> many CJK strings display the accelerator is not fully strippe
Hey,
I have been looking at these bugs yesterday:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323956
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
The first bug complains about the fact that the "(_F)" form in which
many CJK strings display the accelerator is not fully stripped out
when show
18 matches
Mail list logo
