On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Gil Forcada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> André's ping was about bug:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599066
>
> Which Paul Cutler said you were working on.
>
> Could you give us a status update on it?
Hi Gil,
I've not worked on this bug at all yet but am going t
Hi Gil,
We don't advance in the solution of the bug. Jeff will work
on this bug now.
I'm going install the Transfex instance.
Cheers,
Alexandro Silva
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:59:58 +0100
Gil Forcada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> André's ping was about bug:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
Hi,
André's ping was about bug:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599066
Which Paul Cutler said you were working on.
Could you give us a status update on it?
Cheers,
El dc 27 de 10 de 2010 a les 11:34 -0300, en/na Alexandro Silva va
escriure:
> Hi,
>
>
> Sorry my big delay. I don't
Hi,
Sorry my big delay. I don't use this mail ( peng...@gmail.com ) anymore.
So I can help in the Transifex instance install, do you have any information
about that? How install for example?
Cheers
Alexandro Silva
alexosl...@gmail.com
> * Find a team of people to take the job
>
Alexandro: ping?
Am Samstag, den 16.10.2010, 07:44 -0500 schrieb Paul Cutler:
> Alexandro Silva had been working on this. Alexandro, do you have any
> updates? The original bug
> was https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599066
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Paul
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:20
Hi all!
"Johannes Schmid" , Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:06:39 +0200 (CEST):
> Hi!
>
> > I'm absolutely not opposed to such an idea. But I'm also not convinced
> > that we will be able to keep current D-L functionalities. However if we
> > get some new ones, maybe the global balance might still be positi
Alexandro Silva had been working on this. Alexandro, do you have any
updates? The original bug was
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599066
Thanks.
Paul
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Gil Forcada wrote:
> Hi sysadmins.
>
> I'm quite sure you are aware of the new moduleset proposa
Hi sysadmins.
I'm quite sure you are aware of the new moduleset proposal made by the
release team and the discussion that started at the gnome-i18n mailing
list about how to support external modules not hosted on GNOME
infrastructure.
In the following mail Claude says that Damned-Lies the program
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 13:53 +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
> 2010/10/15 Khaled Hosny :
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
> >>
> >> WOW easy does it. It sounds a bit like we have already made the
> >> decision. This should be discussed thoroughly before we decide
>
2010/10/15 Khaled Hosny :
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
>>
>> WOW easy does it. It sounds a bit like we have already made the
>> decision. This should be discussed thoroughly before we decide
>> anything or ask people to do work on it.
>>
>> While I can certainl
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 01:29:47PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 15.10.2010, 12:58 +0200 schrieb Khaled Hosny:
> > every time I use Transifex I find its UI very confusing and things
> > that can be simply achieved with damned-lies are either impossible or
> > done in a very convolut
> I was about to say some thing along these lines, but you summarised it
> better than what I would have done. I just want to added that every time
> I use Transifex I find its UI very confusing and things that can be
> simply achieved with damned-lies are either impossible or done in a very
> con
Am Freitag, den 15.10.2010, 12:58 +0200 schrieb Khaled Hosny:
> every time I use Transifex I find its UI very confusing and things
> that can be simply achieved with damned-lies are either impossible or
> done in a very convoluted way.
Elaborating your exact problems, and discussing them with Tran
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
>
> WOW easy does it. It sounds a bit like we have already made the
> decision. This should be discussed thoroughly before we decide
> anything or ask people to do work on it.
>
> While I can certainly support the idea of of-loading
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Claude Paroz wrote:
> In recent discussions about new GNOME modulesets reorganizations,
> several people have expressed the proposal to install a Transifex
> instance to replace Damned Lies.
>
> I'm absolutely not opposed to such an idea. But I'm also not convince
2010/10/15 Johannes Schmid :
> Hi!
>
>> I'm absolutely not opposed to such an idea. But I'm also not convinced
>> that we will be able to keep current D-L functionalities. However if we
>> get some new ones, maybe the global balance might still be positive.
>> I think the main objective would be to
Hi!
> I'm absolutely not opposed to such an idea. But I'm also not convinced
> that we will be able to keep current D-L functionalities. However if we
> get some new ones, maybe the global balance might still be positive.
> I think the main objective would be to support (a) auto-commit in GNOME
>
Hi,
In recent discussions about new GNOME modulesets reorganizations,
several people have expressed the proposal to install a Transifex
instance to replace Damned Lies.
I'm absolutely not opposed to such an idea. But I'm also not convinced
that we will be able to keep current D-L functionalities.
18 matches
Mail list logo
