Hi Gil,

We don't advance in the solution of the bug. Jeff will work
on this bug now. 

I'm going install the Transfex instance. 

Cheers,

Alexandro Silva



On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:59:58 +0100
Gil Forcada <gforc...@gnome.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> André's ping was about bug:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599066
> 
> Which Paul Cutler said you were working on.
> 
> Could you give us a status update on it?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> El dc 27 de 10 de 2010 a les 11:34 -0300, en/na Alexandro Silva va
> escriure:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > Sorry my big delay. I don't use this mail ( peng...@gmail.com )
> > anymore.  
> > So I can help in the Transifex instance install, do you have any
> > information about that? How install for example?
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers
> > 
> > 
> > Alexandro Silva
> > alexosl...@gmail.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >       > * Find a team of people to take the job
> > >         > * Install a Transifex instance on GNOME infrastructure
> > >         > * Configure Transifex for GNOME needs
> > >         > * Test Transifex global functionality (pilot languages?)
> > >         > * Decide to switch (or not to switch)
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Andre Klapper <ak...@gmx.net>
> > wrote: Alexandro: ping?
> >         
> >         Am Samstag, den 16.10.2010, 07:44 -0500 schrieb Paul Cutler:
> >         
> >         > Alexandro Silva had been working on this.   Alexandro, do
> >         you have any
> >         > updates?  The original bug
> >         > was https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599066
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > Thanks.
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > Paul
> >         >
> >         > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Gil Forcada
> >         <gforc...@gnome.org>
> >         > wrote:
> >         >         Hi sysadmins.
> >         >
> >         >         I'm quite sure you are aware of the new moduleset
> >         proposal
> >         >         made by the
> >         >         release team and the discussion that started at
> >         > the
> >         gnome-i18n
> >         >         mailing
> >         >         list about how to support external modules not
> >         hosted on GNOME
> >         >         infrastructure.
> >         >
> >         >         In the following mail Claude says that Damned-Lies
> >         the program
> >         >         that runs
> >         >         on l10n.gnome.org could support auto-commit from
> >         > the
> >         web
> >         >         interface but
> >         >         is blocker is on your side.
> >         >
> >         >         Please, could you elaborate the stat of the
> >         > affairs
> >         regarding
> >         >         this
> >         >         topic?
> >         >
> >         >         Could we try to get the details of why it isn't
> >         > done
> >         yet? Not
> >         >         to blame!
> >         >         just to elaborate a plan or try to figure out how
> >         > to
> >         fix the
> >         >         spots.
> >         >
> >         >         In a not so recent survey we made on GNOME
> >         > language
> >         teams
> >         >         coordinators
> >         >         one of the more requested features for improving
> >         Damned-Lies
> >         >         was to get
> >         >         auto-commit from within Damned-Lies itself, so if
> >         anyone can
> >         >         fix that
> >         >         blocker be sure that your work will be hugely
> >         appreciated!
> >         >
> >         >         Cheers,
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >         El dv 15 de 10 de 2010 a les 09:41 +0200, en/na
> >         Claude Paroz
> >         >         va
> >         >         escriure:
> >         >         > Hi,
> >         >         >
> >         >         > In recent discussions about new GNOME modulesets
> >         >         reorganizations,
> >         >         > several people have expressed the proposal to
> >         install a
> >         >         Transifex
> >         >         > instance to replace Damned Lies.
> >         >         >
> >         >         > I'm absolutely not opposed to such an idea. But
> >         I'm also not
> >         >         convinced
> >         >         > that we will be able to keep current D-L
> >         functionalities.
> >         >         However if we
> >         >         > get some new ones, maybe the global balance
> >         >         > might
> >         still be
> >         >         positive.
> >         >         > I think the main objective would be to support
> >         >         > (a)
> >         >         auto-commit in GNOME
> >         >         > git infrastructure (the blocker is currently on
> >         sysadmin
> >         >         side) and (b)
> >         >         > auto-commit in an i18n branch of each tracked
> >         branch for
> >         >         modules not
> >         >         > hosted in GNOME infrastructure.
> >         >         >
> >         >         > We need now some people to take care of this.
> >         Personally I
> >         >         currently
> >         >         > don't have the required time to dive into this
> >         issue.
> >         >         >
> >         >         > Here are some steps we could follow to go
> >         >         > further:
> >         >         > * Find a team of people to take the job
> >         >         > * Install a Transifex instance on GNOME
> >         infrastructure
> >         >         > * Configure Transifex for GNOME needs
> >         >         > * Test Transifex global functionality (pilot
> >         languages?)
> >         >         > * Decide to switch (or not to switch)
> >         >         >
> >         >         > Thoughts?
> >         >         >
> >         >         > Claude
> >         >
> >         >         --
> >         >         gil forcada
> >         >
> >         >         [ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de
> >         créixer
> >         >         [en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network
> >         >         bloc: http://gil.badall.net
> >         >         planet: http://planet.guifi.net
> >         >
> >         >         _______________________________________________
> >         >         gnome-infrastructure mailing list
> >         >         gnome-infrastruct...@gnome.org
> >         >
> >         http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
> >         >
> >         >
> >         
> >         > _______________________________________________
> >         > gnome-i18n mailing list
> >         > gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> >         > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
> >         
> >         --
> >         mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
> >         http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
> >         
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Alexandro Silva
> > http://blog.alexos.com.br
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-i18n mailing list
> > gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
> 




_______________________________________________
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Reply via email to