Alexandro Silva had been working on this. Alexandro, do you have any updates? The original bug was https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599066
Thanks. Paul On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Gil Forcada <gforc...@gnome.org> wrote: > Hi sysadmins. > > I'm quite sure you are aware of the new moduleset proposal made by the > release team and the discussion that started at the gnome-i18n mailing > list about how to support external modules not hosted on GNOME > infrastructure. > > In the following mail Claude says that Damned-Lies the program that runs > on l10n.gnome.org could support auto-commit from the web interface but > is blocker is on your side. > > Please, could you elaborate the stat of the affairs regarding this > topic? > > Could we try to get the details of why it isn't done yet? Not to blame! > just to elaborate a plan or try to figure out how to fix the spots. > > In a not so recent survey we made on GNOME language teams coordinators > one of the more requested features for improving Damned-Lies was to get > auto-commit from within Damned-Lies itself, so if anyone can fix that > blocker be sure that your work will be hugely appreciated! > > Cheers, > > > El dv 15 de 10 de 2010 a les 09:41 +0200, en/na Claude Paroz va > escriure: > > Hi, > > > > In recent discussions about new GNOME modulesets reorganizations, > > several people have expressed the proposal to install a Transifex > > instance to replace Damned Lies. > > > > I'm absolutely not opposed to such an idea. But I'm also not convinced > > that we will be able to keep current D-L functionalities. However if we > > get some new ones, maybe the global balance might still be positive. > > I think the main objective would be to support (a) auto-commit in GNOME > > git infrastructure (the blocker is currently on sysadmin side) and (b) > > auto-commit in an i18n branch of each tracked branch for modules not > > hosted in GNOME infrastructure. > > > > We need now some people to take care of this. Personally I currently > > don't have the required time to dive into this issue. > > > > Here are some steps we could follow to go further: > > * Find a team of people to take the job > > * Install a Transifex instance on GNOME infrastructure > > * Configure Transifex for GNOME needs > > * Test Transifex global functionality (pilot languages?) > > * Decide to switch (or not to switch) > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Claude > > -- > gil forcada > > [ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer > [en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network > bloc: http://gil.badall.net > planet: http://planet.guifi.net > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-infrastructure mailing list > gnome-infrastruct...@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
_______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
