Le jeudi 17 avril 2008, à 04:10 +0100, GNOME Status Pages a écrit :
> This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
> http://l10n.gnome.org/.
>
> There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-panel.HEAD':
>
> + "_12 hour format"
> + "_24 hour forma
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
http://l10n.gnome.org/.
There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-panel.HEAD':
+ "_12 hour format"
+ "_24 hour format"
Note that this doesn't directly indicate a string freeze break, but it
might b
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:36:11PM +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> Previous intltool (0.35.5) on l10n.gnome.org didn't handle .policy
> files correctly. This is basically "marking existing strings for
> translation" (though I've just updated intltool to 0.37.0, so expect
> more breakages like this).
Today at 15:29, GNOME Status Pages wrote:
> This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
> http://l10n.gnome.org/.
>
> There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-panel.HEAD':
>
> + "Change system time zone"
> + "Change system time"
> + "Conf
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
http://l10n.gnome.org/.
There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-panel.HEAD':
+ "Change system time zone"
+ "Change system time"
+ "Configure hardware clock"
+ "Privileges are required to c
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 20:14 +0100, Jorge González González wrote:
> El mar, 19-02-2008 a las 08:49 -0500, Matthias Clasen escribió:
> > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 09:08 +0100, Claude Paroz wrote:
> > > Le mardi 19 février 2008 à 00:44 +, GNOME Status Pages a écrit :
> > > > This is an automatic not
Hi Matthias,
Today at 16:41, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Gosh, don't we have more important things to do than fight over 4 (!)
> irrelevant strings ?
Since out of all contributors, GNOME translators are the ones most
affected by string freeze breakages (i.e. you think you're done with
something and
El mar, 19-02-2008 a las 08:49 -0500, Matthias Clasen escribió:
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 09:08 +0100, Claude Paroz wrote:
> > Le mardi 19 février 2008 à 00:44 +, GNOME Status Pages a écrit :
> > > This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
> > > http://l10n.gnome.o
Hi!
> Thanks for the details. 1 of 2 approvals from me, but please, PLEASE,
> next time wait for the approvals before comitting.
> We need rules to make the GNOME community rock! Even if it seems
> sometimes limiting.
>
> Keep the good work.
2 of 2 - nothing to add to Claude's comment!
Regards,
Le mardi 19 février 2008 à 10:41 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 16:34 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 19.02.2008, 08:49 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
> > > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 09:08 +0100, Claude Paroz wrote:
> > > Please, revert the commit and wait unt
Am Dienstag, den 19.02.2008, 10:41 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
> Gosh, don't we have more important things to do than fight over 4 (!)
> irrelevant strings ? Here is what I sent to Vincent about the patches.
[...]
thanks, that's what i wanted to see. that 2 seconds' copy&paste right in
the firs
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 17:16 +0100, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> Hi Matthias!
>
> > Here is a bunch of post-merge fixes that I worked on this weekend.
> > Sending mail first instead of committing right away, since some of them
> > are somewhat more invasive, so I'd rather get a second pair of eyes.
>
Hi Matthias!
> Here is a bunch of post-merge fixes that I worked on this weekend.
> Sending mail first instead of committing right away, since some of them
> are somewhat more invasive, so I'd rather get a second pair of eyes.
> Or, if you don't care, just tell me to go ahead...
(...)
Much better
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 16:34 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 19.02.2008, 08:49 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
> > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 09:08 +0100, Claude Paroz wrote:
> > Please, revert the commit and wait until you get two approvals for your
> > > request from gnome-i18n Team befo
Am Dienstag, den 19.02.2008, 08:49 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 09:08 +0100, Claude Paroz wrote:
> Please, revert the commit and wait until you get two approvals for your
> > request from gnome-i18n Team before committing the patch. Thanks!
> No.
>
> See, this is not a
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 09:08 +0100, Claude Paroz wrote:
> Le mardi 19 février 2008 à 00:44 +, GNOME Status Pages a écrit :
> > This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/.
> >
> > There have been following string additions to module 'gnom
Le mardi 19 février 2008 à 00:44 +, GNOME Status Pages a écrit :
> This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
> http://l10n.gnome.org/.
>
> There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-panel.HEAD':
>
> + "%H:%M (%A)"
> + "%l:%M %p (%A)"
>
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
http://l10n.gnome.org/.
There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-panel.HEAD':
+ "%H:%M (%A)"
+ "%l:%M %p (%A)"
+ "%l:%M %p"
Note that this doesn't directly indicate a string freeze break, but
Le mardi 01 mai 2007 à 03:23 +0100, Gnome Status Pages a écrit :
> This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
> http://l10n.gnome.org/.
>
> There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-panel.HEAD':
>
> + "Force the panel to not be automatically res
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
http://l10n.gnome.org/.
There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-panel.HEAD':
+ "Force the panel to not be automatically restarted"
+ "Location"
+ "The panel could not register with the bonobo-
20 matches
Mail list logo
