Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two

2010-10-11 Thread Gil Forcada
Hi! El dg 10 de 10 de 2010 a les 01:41 +0200, en/na Petr Kovar va escriure: > Hi! > > Michael Terry , Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:30:14 -0400: > > > On 8 October 2010 03:13, Johannes Schmid wrote: > > >> The best solution IMHO would be to import PO files for all > > >> applications, and integrate them i

Fwd: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-11 Thread Ask Hjorth Larsen
This was by mistake sent to only gnome-i18n - forwarding now also to devel. (Thanks, Christian Rose) -- Forwarded message -- From: Ask Hjorth Larsen Date: Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:16 AM Subject: Re: New module proposal: Clutter core To: Kenneth Nielsen Cc: GNOME i18n list On M

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-11 Thread Kenneth Nielsen
2010/10/11 Christian Rose : > 2010/10/11 Ask Hjorth Larsen : >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Kenneth Nielsen >> wrote: > [...] >>> I agree. From the point of a translation coordinator. The best choise >>> is to have all translations in one place that he/she controls. >>> Alternatively, when

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-11 Thread Christian Rose
2010/10/11 Ask Hjorth Larsen : > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Kenneth Nielsen > wrote: [...] >> I agree. From the point of a translation coordinator. The best choise >> is to have all translations in one place that he/she controls. >> Alternatively, when that fails the second best options is

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-11 Thread Ask Hjorth Larsen
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Kenneth Nielsen wrote: > 2010/10/10 Petr Kovar : >> Hi! >> >> Matthias Clasen , Thu, 7 Oct 2010 07:55:42 -0400: >> >>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Vincent Untz wrote: >>> >>> > I think the right solution is to improve l10n.gnome.org so that it can >>> > inter

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-11 Thread Kenneth Nielsen
2010/10/10 Petr Kovar : > Hi! > > Matthias Clasen , Thu, 7 Oct 2010 07:55:42 -0400: > >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Vincent Untz wrote: >> >> > I think the right solution is to improve l10n.gnome.org so that it can >> > interacts with other platforms (like transifex) where there is a team >>