Re: [gmx-users] GROMACS 4.6.3 Static Linking

2013-07-24 Thread Andrew R Turner
Hi Vitaly, Impossible just for v4.6.3? It was certainly possible to create static executables for a Cray XE using v4.6.1 (I know, because I have done it). I followed the same procedure for 4.6.3 and have only managed to get dynamic executables (which do not work) hence my question. I will

Re: [gmx-users] Getting a .tpr file for C-alpha atoms from an all atom .tpr file

2013-07-24 Thread bipin singh
Thanks a lot. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: > > > On 7/23/13 11:58 AM, bipin singh wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I there any way to get a .tpr for C-alpha atoms from an all atom .tpr >> file. >> >> > tpbconv -h, particularly point 3. > > -Justin > > -- > =

[gmx-users] Fábio Filippi Matioli Unsubscribe

2013-07-24 Thread Jonathan Saboury
Look at the bottom on this page: http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please d

[gmx-users] In g_dos, how to calculate the DoS of a certain group in system?

2013-07-24 Thread ????
Dear All, I am trying to use g_dos to calculate the DoS of a bio-water system. However, I could not choose a certain group (e.g. the protein) from the index file. My command is like this : g_dos -f x.trr -s x.tpr -n x.ndx And, I also have tried to calculate the DoS of the protein individually fr

RE: [gmx-users] Calculate interaction energy dynamically

2013-07-24 Thread Davit Hakobyan
Please find below the gmxcheck output. Opposite to what I said earlier it does contain warning messages. Thanks a lot for any suggestion. gmxcheck output: Option Filename Type Description -f /scratch/tmp/dhako_01/proje

R: Re: [gmx-users] Rotation Constraints - PMF + rerun

2013-07-24 Thread battis...@libero.it
Dear Carsten, Thank you very much for your very useful help! I'm making some tries to test the orire options that probably will solve my problem. In order to do not waste resource, I thought using the rerun option of mdrun I can use the trajectories generated before, where my mistake was to all

Re: [gmx-users] Limitations of simulations?

2013-07-24 Thread David van der Spoel
On 2013-07-24 01:57, Jonathan Saboury wrote: I just finished this tutorial and found it very informative: http://cinjweb.umdnj.edu/~kerrigje/pdf_files/trp_drug_tutor.pdf However, This was based on a complex from a pdb. I was wondering if it was possible to just simulate the protein without comp

Re: [gmx-users] Rotation Constraints - PMF + rerun

2013-07-24 Thread Carsten Kutzner
On Jul 24, 2013, at 12:30 PM, battis...@libero.it wrote: > Dear Carsten, > > Thank you very much for your very useful help! > I'm making some tries to test the orire options that probably will solve my > problem. > > In order to do not waste resource, I thought using the rerun option of mdrun

Re: [gmx-users] Limitations of simulations?

2013-07-24 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/24/13 6:44 AM, David van der Spoel wrote: On 2013-07-24 01:57, Jonathan Saboury wrote: I just finished this tutorial and found it very informative: http://cinjweb.umdnj.edu/~kerrigje/pdf_files/trp_drug_tutor.pdf However, This was based on a complex from a pdb. I was wondering if it was

Re: [gmx-users] Calculate interaction energy dynamically

2013-07-24 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/24/13 5:49 AM, Davit Hakobyan wrote: Please find below the gmxcheck output. Opposite to what I said earlier it does contain warning messages. Thanks a lot for any suggestion. gmxcheck output: Option Filename Type Description -

Re: [gmx-users] membrane simulations

2013-07-24 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/24/13 2:55 AM, Sathish Kumar wrote: I am doing simulation of metal clusters with membranes by position restrain (with f=1000) the membrane. In this simulation the structure of metal cluster is collapsed after entering into membrane. I want to preserves its structure with out doing position

[gmx-users] interaction energy using g_enemat

2013-07-24 Thread Poojari, Chetan
Dear All, I want to calculate interaction energy per residue. Below is the command i used: g_enemat -f strand.edr -groups groups.dat -emat strand_emat.xpm my groups.dat file contains these lines: 3 strand1_SER_34 strand1_THR_36 strand1_TYR_37 When i execute the above g_enemat command i get

R: Re: [gmx-users] Rotation Constraints - PMF + rerun

2013-07-24 Thread battis...@libero.it
in my traj.xtc file there are 1 frame every 10 ps from 0 ps to 1 ps, therefore in total 1001 frames. I tried -x trj.xtc instead -o trj.trr, but mdrun has generated a file trj.xtc. trr Many thanks! Anna >Messaggio originale >Da: ckut...@gwdg.de >Data: 24/07/2013 13.09 >A: "batti

Re: [gmx-users] OpenSuse 12.1 + CUDA Installation Error

2013-07-24 Thread Mirco Wahab
On 24.07.2013 04:08, Carlos Bueno wrote: *Hi,* *I keep getting errors when I try to install gromacs in OpenSuse 12.1.* *I have installed cuda 5.0 and the nvidia cards. **I have tried with different parameters for cmake:* How did you install Cuda5? What did you install and how? I have one OpenS

[gmx-users] Index error

2013-07-24 Thread Collins Nganou
Dear Users, I would like to know if anyone may help me understand how to update the index file. I am trying to simulate a dna in solution. I have relaxed a Solvent with attached min.mdp file without problem. in the second step I was intended to relax SOL + Na DNA with 20ps.mdp. But the index file

Re: [gmx-users] Index error

2013-07-24 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/24/13 8:34 AM, Collins Nganou wrote: Dear Users, I would like to know if anyone may help me understand how to update the index file. I am trying to simulate a dna in solution. I have relaxed a Solvent with attached min.mdp file without problem. in the second step I was intended to relax S

Re: [gmx-users] interaction energy using g_enemat

2013-07-24 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/24/13 7:47 AM, Poojari, Chetan wrote: Dear All, I want to calculate interaction energy per residue. Below is the command i used: g_enemat -f strand.edr -groups groups.dat -emat strand_emat.xpm my groups.dat file contains these lines: 3 strand1_SER_34 strand1_THR_36 strand1_TYR_37 W

RE: [gmx-users] Calculate interaction energy dynamically

2013-07-24 Thread Davit Hakobyan
Thank you again for your time and help. Performing "rerun" on the original system passes without warnings with the following output: Option Filename Type Des

Re: [gmx-users] Calculate interaction energy dynamically

2013-07-24 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/24/13 9:25 AM, Davit Hakobyan wrote: Thank you again for your time and help. Performing "rerun" on the original system passes without warnings with the following output: -

[gmx-users] Umbrella Sampling _ pulled ion

2013-07-24 Thread Shima Arasteh
Hi, I am trying to run US on a system composed of lipid bilayer/ ion/ water/ peptide. The peptide is inserted through the lipid bilayer and I' d like to study the ion conduction through the peptide across the membrane. In order to do so, I tried to set a specific ion ( Ces with the atom number

Re: [gmx-users] Umbrella Sampling _ pulled ion

2013-07-24 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/24/13 11:30 AM, Shima Arasteh wrote: Hi, I am trying to run US on a system composed of lipid bilayer/ ion/ water/ peptide. The peptide is inserted through the lipid bilayer and I' d like to study the ion conduction through the peptide across the membrane. In order to do so, I tried to

R: Re: [gmx-users] Rotation Constraints - PMF - external potential

2013-07-24 Thread battis...@libero.it
Dear Carsten could you give me more information about your suggestions? I tried but probably I did not understand well what you meant. In order to avoid the rotation of the structure A and of the structure B, I have defined into the index file a group A_B that contains A+B and I have setted i

Re: [gmx-users] Umbrella Sampling _ pulled ion

2013-07-24 Thread Shima Arasteh
Yes, Thanks. Would you give me a hint on this fact that how I would be sure that I am running a correct US ? with proper settings? To save time, I' d prefer to run the US.mdp just for one window. Do you agree with me that if I run an incorrect US for any of the windows, I would get an odd resul

[gmx-users] Box dimension size errors in MARTINI soft core simulation

2013-07-24 Thread Scott Pendley
I am fairly new to gromacs and I am trying to run a thermodynamic integration simulation of a ligand disappearing in a box of octanol at a single set lambda point. I have previous successful nvt and npt runs of this system. When I have added the free energy portions to the input file, I get the f

Re: [gmx-users] Box dimension size errors in MARTINI soft core simulation

2013-07-24 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/24/13 4:33 PM, Scott Pendley wrote: I am fairly new to gromacs and I am trying to run a thermodynamic integration simulation of a ligand disappearing in a box of octanol at a single set lambda point. I have previous successful nvt and npt runs of this system. When I have added the free e

[gmx-users] Limitations of simulations?

2013-07-24 Thread Jonathan Saboury
>For the rest of us mere mortals who don't have access to specialized hardware >that allows for 10- or 20-microsecond simulations, the brute force approach is >rather futile. Techniques like steered MD and Hamiltonian replica exchange MD >are probably more feasible. Unbiased simulations of suffic

Re: [gmx-users] Limitations of simulations?

2013-07-24 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/24/13 9:16 PM, Jonathan Saboury wrote: For the rest of us mere mortals who don't have access to specialized hardware that allows for 10- or 20-microsecond simulations, the brute force approach is rather futile. Techniques like steered MD and Hamiltonian replica exchange MD are probably mo

Re: [gmx-users] OpenSuse 12.1 + CUDA Installation Error

2013-07-24 Thread Carlos Bueno
To install the CUDA I first downloaded and installed the drivers for the Nvidia cards. The command nvidia-smi doen't give me any problems > nvidia-smi Wed Jul 24 17:36:28 2013 +--+ | NVIDIA-SMI 4.310.44 Driver Version: 310.44 | |--

[gmx-users] Re: Limitations of simulations?

2013-07-24 Thread Jonathan Saboury
Hm, I am probably completely wrong about this, but can you do implicit solvent and Periodic Box Conditions? -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Limitations-of-simulations-tp5010100p5010103.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[gmx-users] (no subject)

2013-07-24 Thread Jonathan Saboury
>In an implicit, non-periodic system, it is more likely that the ligand will >float away from the protein. I've tried it and that's all that ever happens. >Moreover, the current Gromacs version does not support implicit solvent on GPU >and the previous version that did had very limited functionali

[gmx-users] binding energy for membrane system

2013-07-24 Thread Albert
Hello: I notice that the manual or tutorial in Gromacs (FEP, unbralla sampling, TI and so on) website for binding energy evaluation are all for protein in water. I am just wondering how can we evaluate the protein/ligand binding affinity for membrane system accurately? Probably the most diff

[gmx-users] coupling to center of mass

2013-07-24 Thread sreelakshmi ramesh
How to apply temp coupling only to the center-of-mass motion of water molecules in mdp file. -- Sree lakshmi ramesh Ph.D student Center for Computational Natural Sciences and Bioinformatics International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad Gachibowli, Hyderabad 500032 ph: +91 40 665319