Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-24 Thread Szilárd Páll
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote: > > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:07:04 +0100 > > From: Szil?rd P?ll > > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on > > Debian > > To: Discussion list for

Re: Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-24 Thread Christoph Junghans
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:55:13 +0100 > From: Szil?rd P?ll > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on > Debian > To: Discussion list for GROMACS users > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > &

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-24 Thread Mark Abraham
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:48 PM, James Starlight wrote: > Justin, Szilárd, thanks for suggestion! > > It will be easily for me to found a better card :) > > By the way in other topics some developments told me that the Plumed > plugin for methadynamics will be realised in gromacs 4.6. I've checked

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-24 Thread Christoph Junghans
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:07:04 +0100 > From: Szil?rd P?ll > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on > Debian > To: Discussion list for GROMACS users > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > >

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-24 Thread James Starlight
Justin, Szilárd, thanks for suggestion! It will be easily for me to found a better card :) By the way in other topics some developments told me that the Plumed plugin for methadynamics will be realised in gromacs 4.6. I've checked for it in manual but could not find any notions about it . Have it

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-24 Thread Szilárd Páll
Let me add two more things. Note that we *always* compare performance and acceleration to our super-tuned state-of-the-art CPU code, which I can confidently say that is among the fastest if not the fastest to date, and never to some slow (CPU) implementation. Therefore, while other codes might be

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-24 Thread Szilárd Páll
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: > > > On 1/24/13 9:23 AM, James Starlight wrote: > >> oh that was simply solved by upgrading of G++ :) >> >> the only problem which remains is the missing of support of mu GPU :( >> That time I've tried to start simulation on simply 2 cores CP

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-24 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/24/13 9:23 AM, James Starlight wrote: oh that was simply solved by upgrading of G++ :) the only problem which remains is the missing of support of mu GPU :( That time I've tried to start simulation on simply 2 cores CPU + geforce 9500 From md run I've obtained NOTE: Error occurred dur

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-24 Thread James Starlight
ectly fine solution if you get >> the new (enough version of the) standard C++ library by doing so. >> >> Just wanted to clarify this for users bumping into this issue later. >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Szilárd >> >> >> On Wed, Jan

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-24 Thread James Starlight
ify this for users bumping into this issue later. > > Cheers, > > -- > Szilárd > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Ricardo wrote: > >> On 01/22/2013 06:02 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote: >> >>> Message: 5 >>>> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:42:01 +0100 &g

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-23 Thread Szilárd Páll
ge: 5 >>> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:42:01 +0100 >>> From: Szil?rd P?ll >>> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on >>> Debian >>> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users >>> Message-ID: >>> >>

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-23 Thread Ricardo
On 01/22/2013 06:02 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote: Message: 5 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:42:01 +0100 From: Szil?rd P?ll Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-22 Thread Christoph Junghans
> Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:42:01 +0100 > From: Szil?rd P?ll > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on > Debian > To: Discussion list for GROMACS users > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-22 Thread James Starlight
Szilárd, thanks for suggestion. Indeed I've noticed that versions of all packages in classic debian are older in comparison to debian mint ( despite I've done maximum upgrade of the system via apt). Tomorrow I'll try to install newest gcc and glibc and re-install gromacs. James 2013/1/22 Szilár

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-22 Thread Szilárd Páll
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:45 PM, James Starlight wrote: > Szilárd, > > Today I've tried to re-install cuda+gromacs and do apt-get > distr-upgrade but the same error was obtained during gromacs > I'm don't see how does the distribution upgrade relate to the issues you had (except if you have upda

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-22 Thread James Starlight
Szilárd, Today I've tried to re-install cuda+gromacs and do apt-get distr-upgrade but the same error was obtained during gromacs compilation. By the way where I could provide --add-needed option ? James 2013/1/21 Szilárd Páll : > Szilárd -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http:

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with gromacs-4.6 compilation on Debian

2013-01-21 Thread Szilárd Páll
Hi, Not sure why, but it looks like libcudart.so is linked against a glibc that not compatible with what you have (perhaps much newer)? Alternatively you could try adding "--add-needed" to the linker flags, but I doubt it will help. Cheers, -- Szilárd On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:09 PM, James St