Re: [gmx-users] Adding proton using genion to study proton transfer reaction

2013-10-09 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi DeepaK, You should be aware that excess protons are not floating around freely among a bunch of H2O. Whatever reasoning along this line is physically meaningless (including thinking of a mixture of H3O+, H2O, OH-). This is the realm of QM. Cheers, Tsjerk On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 8:05 AM, De

[gmx-users] Adding proton using genion to study proton transfer reaction

2013-10-09 Thread Deepak Ojha
Dear GMxers, I want to simulate the proton transfer reaction in bulk water using gromacs.I am not aware how to add proton using genion.Is it possible to add excess protons like other ions.I could not find proton in ions.itp. If anybody can guide me about the same. Thanks DeepaK Ojha School Of Ch

Re: [gmx-users] RMSF analysis

2013-10-09 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/9/13 4:09 PM, Sainitin Donakonda wrote: What functional significance does it have, if any? --- According to my knowledge this reside is present in binding site.. and forms some hydrogen bonds with ligand Do you observe hydrogen bonds with the ligand? What is the residue? -- *Glutam

Re: [gmx-users] RMSF analysis

2013-10-09 Thread Gianluca Interlandi
Is that residue in a loop? Gianluca On Wed, 9 Oct 2013, Sainitin Donakonda wrote: Hi all, I recently performed MD simulation of protein - ligand complex..and analyzed its trajectory using RMSF tool in gromacs. This analysis revealed particular residue in binding site of protein showed quite

Re: [gmx-users] RMSF analysis

2013-10-09 Thread Sainitin Donakonda
What functional significance does it have, if any? --- According to my knowledge this reside is present in binding site.. and forms some hydrogen bonds with ligand What is the residue? -- *Glutamic Acid* What did you measure - RMSF of the whole residue, just the backbone, just C-alpha, etc? --*

Re: [gmx-users] RMSF analysis

2013-10-09 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/9/13 3:29 PM, Sainitin Donakonda wrote: Hi all, I recently performed MD simulation of protein - ligand complex..and analyzed its trajectory using RMSF tool in gromacs. This analysis revealed particular residue in binding site of protein showed quite high fluctuation around 0.30 nm but o

[gmx-users] RMSF analysis

2013-10-09 Thread Sainitin Donakonda
Hi all, I recently performed MD simulation of protein - ligand complex..and analyzed its trajectory using RMSF tool in gromacs. This analysis revealed particular residue in binding site of protein showed quite high fluctuation around 0.30 nm but other residues were in range of 0.15 to 0.20 Can a

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM36 force field available for GROMACS

2013-10-09 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/9/13 1:26 PM, Roland Schulz wrote: Hi Justin, are you guys planning anything to make pdb2gmx understand the CHARMM patch residues? We have some python scripts which generate new residues based on the patch residues, which allows us to simulate branched molecules (e.g. glycosylation or li

[gmx-users] RE : gmx-users Digest, Vol 114, Issue 21

2013-10-09 Thread ABEL Stephane 175950
OK thank you four kind response. And also thank you and the CHARMM team for this geat job. Stephane --- On 10/9/13 11:28 AM, ABEL Stephane 175950 wrote: > Hello Justin, > > Two quick questions, here > > - Since the lipid charmm36 parameters for lipids are already available in the >

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM36 force field available for GROMACS

2013-10-09 Thread Roland Schulz
Hi Justin, are you guys planning anything to make pdb2gmx understand the CHARMM patch residues? We have some python scripts which generate new residues based on the patch residues, which allows us to simulate branched molecules (e.g. glycosylation or lignin). But that approach is very suboptimal a

Re: [gmx-users] time evaluation of dimensions of the simulation cell

2013-10-09 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/9/13 9:09 AM, Atila Petrosian wrote: Dear gromacs usres I am doing simulation of lipid bilayer. I did 2 steps: 1) energy minimization, 2) equilibration. Before production run, I want to monitor dimensions of the simulation cell to test the stability of the simulation. On the other han

Re: [gmx-users] Re: CHARMM36 force field available for GROMACS

2013-10-09 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/9/13 11:28 AM, ABEL Stephane 175950 wrote: Hello Justin, Two quick questions, here - Since the lipid charmm36 parameters for lipids are already available in the gromacs format on the GROMACS website (charmm36.ff_4.5.4_ref.tgz) from thomas Piggot. Does it means that these files are co

[gmx-users] Re: CHARMM36 force field available for GROMACS

2013-10-09 Thread ABEL Stephane 175950
Hello Justin, Two quick questions, here - Since the lipid charmm36 parameters for lipids are already available in the gromacs format on the GROMACS website (charmm36.ff_4.5.4_ref.tgz) from thomas Piggot. Does it means that these files are considered as deprecated and all the users are invit

Re: Re: [gmx-users] problem with the amb2gmx.pl

2013-10-09 Thread Alan
And ACPYPE does (besides several others improvements) Alan On 9 October 2013 15:24, xiao wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Thank you very much! The problem is solved. The reason is that amb2gmx > cannot distinguish the proper and improper dihedrals. > > Best wishes > > Fugui > > > > > At 2013-10-09 21:58:

Re:Re: [gmx-users] problem with the amb2gmx.pl

2013-10-09 Thread xiao
Hi Alan, Thank you very much! The problem is solved. The reason is that amb2gmx cannot distinguish the proper and improper dihedrals. Best wishes Fugui At 2013-10-09 21:58:29,Alan wrote: >Hi, try ACPYPE. > >Alan > > >On 9 October 2013 14:07, xiao wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> I am doing

Re: [gmx-users] time evaluation of dimensions of the simulation cell

2013-10-09 Thread Baptiste Demoulin
Hi, you can use g_energy, and then select X-box and Y-box in the prompt. Bests, Baptiste 2013/10/9 Atila Petrosian > Dear gromacs usres > > I am doing simulation of lipid bilayer. > > I did 2 steps: 1) energy minimization, 2) equilibration. > > Before production run, I want to monitor dimens

Re: [gmx-users] problem with the amb2gmx.pl

2013-10-09 Thread Alan
Hi, try ACPYPE. Alan On 9 October 2013 14:07, xiao wrote: > Dear all, > > I am doing membrane protein simulation by using amber force field. The > lipid force field parameters are from the lipid11.dat from Amber. Firstly, > i got the xx.prmtop and xx.prmcrd files, and then i used amb2gmx.pl to

[gmx-users] time evaluation of dimensions of the simulation cell

2013-10-09 Thread Atila Petrosian
Dear gromacs usres I am doing simulation of lipid bilayer. I did 2 steps: 1) energy minimization, 2) equilibration. Before production run, I want to monitor dimensions of the simulation cell to test the stability of the simulation. On the other hands, I want to plot dimensions of the simulation

[gmx-users] problem with the amb2gmx.pl

2013-10-09 Thread xiao
Dear all, I am doing membrane protein simulation by using amber force field. The lipid force field parameters are from the lipid11.dat from Amber. Firstly, i got the xx.prmtop and xx.prmcrd files, and then i used amb2gmx.pl to convert the xx.prmtop and xx.prmcrd files into gromacs files xx.top

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM36 force field available for GROMACS

2013-10-09 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/9/13 7:55 AM, CHEN Pan wrote: Dear Justin, Thanks for you information. I have a small query on the residue name in the "charmm36.ff" folder. Is there any document illustrating for the corresponding full name of residues in the ".rtp" file. As you have illustrated in the file "forcefield.

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM36 force field available for GROMACS

2013-10-09 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/9/13 7:54 AM, rajat desikan wrote: Thank you, Justin. I am particularly interested in the lipid simulations. Can you upload the final results on dropbox? Sorry for the trouble...I intend to simulate a membrane-protein system using charmm36. I will let you know how that goes. I will send

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM36 force field available for GROMACS

2013-10-09 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/9/13 7:55 AM, CHEN Pan wrote: Dear Justin, Thanks for you information. I have a small query on the residue name in the "charmm36.ff" folder. Is there any document illustrating for the corresponding full name of residues in the ".rtp" file. As you have illustrated in the file "forcefield.

[gmx-users] pressure coupling without pbc

2013-10-09 Thread MURAT OZTURK
Hello, I have read somewhere in the list that I cannot do pressure coupling without pbc. What I essentially need is a box with impermeable walls, that get smaller as the simulation proceeds. I do anisotropic pressure coupling with two impermeable walls (in xy axis) for another simulation, and it

[gmx-users] Steered MD

2013-10-09 Thread Steven Neumann
Dear Gromacs Users, I am trying to look for some references regarding the SMD. I found one which tells about logarithmically dependency between the Rupture force (maximum pulling force) obtained from SMD and the pulling rate. Just wondering whether you are aware (or tested) the dependency between

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM36 force field available for GROMACS

2013-10-09 Thread CHEN Pan
Dear Justin, Thanks for you information. I have a small query on the residue name in the "charmm36.ff" folder. Is there any document illustrating for the corresponding full name of residues in the ".rtp" file. As you have illustrated in the file "forcefield.doc", the parameters for some carbohydra

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM36 force field available for GROMACS

2013-10-09 Thread rajat desikan
Thank you, Justin. I am particularly interested in the lipid simulations. Can you upload the final results on dropbox? Sorry for the trouble...I intend to simulate a membrane-protein system using charmm36. I will let you know how that goes. Thanks. On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Justin Lemkul w

Re: [gmx-users] Question about installing DSSP on Ubuntu 12.10

2013-10-09 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/9/13 6:42 AM, Mass wrote: Hi Justin Thanks for your answer but I could not solve the problem, sorry Can you tell me how can I fix this part? the highlighted part is your answer I google it and found this on ubuntu forum but I followed it and still I am getting error up vote 0 down vote

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM36 force field available for GROMACS

2013-10-09 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/9/13 7:03 AM, rajat desikan wrote: Superb stuff, Justin. Thank you so much. Is it asking too much for a brief list of the test systems that you used? Thanks again. We tested everything, at least in terms of representative examples. Single amino acids, full proteins in vacuo, single n

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM36 force field available for GROMACS

2013-10-09 Thread rajat desikan
Superb stuff, Justin. Thank you so much. Is it asking too much for a brief list of the test systems that you used? Thanks again. On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:46 AM, Justin Lemkul wrote: > > All, > > I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of the latest CHARMM36 > force field in GROMACS

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM36 force field available for GROMACS

2013-10-09 Thread Mark Abraham
Great! Many thanks Justin, and the CHARMM team! Mark On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: > > All, > > I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of the latest CHARMM36 > force field in GROMACS format. You can obtain the archive from our lab's > website at > http://