Steven Kirk wrote:
Hello,
I would be very grateful for advice on the following system:
Consider a pair of spherical macromolecules of diameter ~2.5 nm,
arranged along an x-axis so that their centres of mass are 4nm apart,
then centered in a 14 x 10 x 10 nm periodic box, so that the minimum
d
Dongsheng Zhang wrote:
Yang Ye,
I am sorry to tell you I am not clear yet. Do you think I need to
specify energygrps and corresponding energygrp_table?
If so, then I got any error message. gp1 includes atom A, and gp3
includes atom A and B. Gromacs will complain that atoma has been in two
gro
Yang Ye,
I am sorry to tell you I am not clear yet. Do you think I need to
specify energygrps and corresponding energygrp_table?
If so, then I got any error message. gp1 includes atom A, and gp3
includes atom A and B. Gromacs will complain that atoma has been in two
groups. Each group uses it ow
Sorry all,
Here is a better question having read the on-line
manual. How do I modify the following BASH config
files so I can gmx commands understood. (e.g. pass the
"luck" command test). What is my if I'm running
an intel iMAc OS 10.4? Guidance appreciated.
**computer-2:/etc root# cat p
Don't worry about that.
mdrun -tablep {tablep} will follow the scheme {tablep}_A_A.xvg,
{tablep}_B_B.xvg ...
{tablep} may be replaced by your own filename.
Yang Ye
Dongsheng Zhang wrote:
Yang ye,
Thank you very much.
I have three different monomers in my system, so I have 6 different
regula
when i am trying to generate *.tpr file for energy minimization, i am getting
error that "atomtype NR not found!". my ligand.itp file has atomtype NR.
i have generated this file through prodrg. how should i decide the atomtype?
___
gmx-users mailing lis
Yang ye,
Thank you very much.
I have three different monomers in my system, so I have 6 different
regular VMDs and 6 different 1-4 interactions. Could you please tell me
how to organize those table.xvg files?
energygrps = gp1 gp2 gp3 gp4 gp5 gp6 ... gp12
energygrp_table = A A B B C C A B A C B C
mdrun -tablep
Dongsheng Zhang wrote:
Hello, GMX users,
I have a coarse-grained model. Both 1-4 and regular vdw interaction are
tabulated, but no electrostatic interaction. Since there is no entry for
1-4 interaction in energy_table. I am thinking to fool gromacs by
treating 1-4 interactions as
Hello, GMX users,
I have a coarse-grained model. Both 1-4 and regular vdw interaction are
tabulated, but no electrostatic interaction. Since there is no entry for
1-4 interaction in energy_table. I am thinking to fool gromacs by
treating 1-4 interactions as electrostatic interactions, in other wor
Hi,
I am working on dimeric hemoglobin, which has a bound oxygen molecule O2.
When I convert pdb file to gro and top files by pdb2gmx it fails, since
Gromacs does not recognize O2. I have checked the discussion list and this
kind of question was asked once, however, I still have the couple que
Hello Mark,
Thanks for your scripts. They are well commented and very easy to
understand. Unfornunately, they don't work with my CHARMM parm files. It
is probably a problem of format at the .par begining. I don't know well
Perl but I think I can fix this.
In the conversion made by Yuguang MU, ava
Those parameters should be in **bond.itp file, and you can use four
atoms to define a dihedral angle. You can check ffoplsaabon.itp. I am
confused by that note as well.
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 13:14 -0400, ARGYRIOS KARATRANTOS wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> according to the manual the proper dihedrals ar
those are supposed to be in a parameters file. If not, look for some published paper about dynamics with a system that has those same atom sequences you listed. Maybe there's even a paper related you your actual research and it has the parameters you need.==Original message text
so, if i observe in md.log an exchange like:
"Repl ex 012 x 3" for e.g. time step 1
that would convert into:
"1 0 1 3 2"
for remd.xvg. is that correct?
the way you translate looks reasonable but I never used
the version (?) you use so I won't be able to comment
more.
the
Hi all,
according to the manual the proper dihedrals are set, using in the topology
file(top file) the inner two atoms of the dihedral. But how i can set the two
following dihedrals, which have the same inner atoms
C-O-C-H
C-O-C-C
but different external atoms, and of course different K values(KJ
> you do need this option (-demux) and the xvg file should hold N+1 columns
> containing the correct permutation of replicas, e.g.
>
> time repl 0 1 2 3 ...
> 0 0 1 2 3
> 1 1 0 2 3
> 2 1 2 0 3
>
> and so on
so, if i observe in md.log an exchange like:
"Repl ex 0
Hello,
I would be very grateful for advice on the following system:
Consider a pair of spherical macromolecules of diameter ~2.5 nm,
arranged along an x-axis so that their centres of mass are 4nm apart,
then centered in a 14 x 10 x 10 nm periodic box, so that the minimum
distance between eith
hm, i want to produce one continuous trajectory from several trajectories, that
are output from a REMD run. i could not find much information about this
matter, but from what i read i gathered that one needs to reorder all the
trajectories into a new one using the demux option in trjcat. as f
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, merc mertens wrote:
>hm, i want to produce one continuous trajectory from several trajectories,
>that are output from a REMD run. i could not find much information about this
>matter, but from what i read i gathered that one needs to reorder all the
>trajectories into a new
hm, i want to produce one continuous trajectory from several trajectories, that
are output from a REMD run. i could not find much information about this
matter, but from what i read i gathered that one needs to reorder all the
trajectories into a new one using the demux option in trjcat. as far
at the end of a REMD run in gromacs I have as many trajectories as replicas
used for simulation. To produce one continuous trajectory trjcat was
recommended in a previous message. Since it neither makes sense to simply
concatenate all trajectories nor can one sort them by time, I suspect that
Hello,
at the end of a REMD run in gromacs I have as many trajectories as replicas
used for simulation. To produce one continuous trajectory trjcat was
recommended in a previous message. Since it neither makes sense to simply
concatenate all trajectories nor can one sort them by time, I suspect
Dongsheng Zhang wrote:
Dear Mark,
Do you have any idea what's wrong with my simulation? You can find the
mdp file and the description how I set up my system at the bottom of
this email.
If you're trying to do vacuum simulations with infinite cutoffs and no
periodicity, then the .mdp looks fi
Thank you so much, Berk.
I deeply appreciate of your comments.
Jae H. Park
Original message
>Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:04:19 +0200
>From: "Berk Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Question about center-of-mass
removal
>To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
>
>
>
>
>>From: Jae H
From: "pim lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],Discussion list for GROMACS users
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Energy profile with umbrella sampling
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:48:09 +0200
On 7/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
From
From: Jae Hyun Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Question about center-of-mass removal
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:27:55 -0500
Thank you, Mark.
I have one more question for the confirmation. So,
26 matches
Mail list logo