findepi commented on code in PR #13672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13672#discussion_r1986025313
##
datafusion-cli/CONTRIBUTING.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+
+
+# Development instructions
+
+## Running Tests
+
+Tests can be run using `cargo`
+
+```shell
+cargo tes
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1050:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1050
Bumps [datafusion-ffi](https://github.com/apache/datafusion) from 45.0.0 to
46.0.0.
Commits
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/commit/d5ca8307940c1a6345419a2c8d91ef877
ozankabak commented on PR #15030:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15030#issuecomment-2704990515
Thanks for improving the docs, left my suggestions inline
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t
Spaarsh commented on PR #982:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/982#issuecomment-2708491224
Key Points:
1. ```|``` operator not supported for python < 3.10, anyone pulling the main
post merge will not be able to use ```SessionContext``` at all
2. ```global_ctx``` a
Spaarsh commented on issue #1045:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1045#issuecomment-2708491652
Key Points:
1. ```|``` operator not supported for python < 3.10, anyone pulling the main
will not be able to use ```SessionContext``` at all
2. ```global_ctx``` alrea
timsaucer closed issue #806: Add udf / udaf decorators
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/806
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscrib
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #15090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15090#discussion_r1986194642
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/order.slt:
##
@@ -985,13 +985,20 @@ drop table ambiguity_test;
statement ok
create table t(a0 int, a int, b int, c int)
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #15090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15090#discussion_r1986194642
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/order.slt:
##
@@ -985,13 +985,20 @@ drop table ambiguity_test;
statement ok
create table t(a0 int, a int, b int, c int)
akurmustafa commented on code in PR #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#discussion_r1986190590
##
content/blog/2025-03-05-ordering-analysis.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Analysis of Ordering for Better Plans
+date: 2025-03-05
+author
chenquan commented on issue #15065:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15065#issuecomment-2708618865
> > [@alamb](https://github.com/alamb) Hello, thank you very much! In
addition, I want to know how to control the cancellation of tasks by myself.
Currently, I have observed th
akurmustafa commented on PR #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#issuecomment-2708620029
Hi @alamb, I have addressed the points you mention. I also changed the order
of some sections to make the post more clear. I am happy to address reviews by
the community.
--
Th
XiangpengHao opened a new pull request, #15102:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15102
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
I encountered a compile error when trying to upgrade DataFusion to V46 for
[paruqet vi
PokIsemaine commented on issue #15071:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15071#issuecomment-2708645397
I want to discuss `JoinType`:
JoinOperator
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1692
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pul
XiangpengHao commented on code in PR #15102:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15102#discussion_r1986212420
##
.github/workflows/rust.yml:
##
@@ -259,6 +259,10 @@ jobs:
uses: ./.github/actions/setup-builder
with:
rust-version: stable
+
Chen-Yuan-Lai commented on PR #14826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14826#issuecomment-2708661495
Hi @jayzhan211, It seems all the CI checks were passed (including
sqlogicaltest), but when I created and printed a table table by datafusion-cli
, I got empty result
```
Omega359 commented on PR #14590:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14590#issuecomment-2708589256
I am wondering if this test is just too strenuous for the ci runners. If it
could be narrowed down to just the modified code I could see this working,
otherwise perhaps it'll either
clflushopt commented on issue #14608:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14608#issuecomment-2708663987
Hey @alamb @lmwnshn I've been actually following the CMU 15-799 course
(nights and weekend's mostly) and started working on a Rust port of the
benchbase Java implementation a
himadripal commented on code in PR #1385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1385#discussion_r1986214497
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometCastSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1126,27 +1129,33 @@ class CometCastSuite extends CometTestBase with
AdaptiveSparkPlan
himadripal commented on PR #1385:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1385#issuecomment-2708663771
> I left a comment about a missing assertion
@andygrove I did not see this comment. Although I reverted previous changes
related to spark3.3 assertion and added a chec
wiedld commented on code in PR #15074:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15074#discussion_r1986108634
##
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/enforce_distribution.rs:
##
@@ -442,40 +445,30 @@ impl TestConfig {
self.config.execution.target_partitions = t
andygrove commented on PR #79:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/pull/79#issuecomment-2708384249
@robtandy This is now ready for review. I was able to run the benchmarks
this morning based on these instructions.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To r
danila-b opened a new pull request, #15101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15101
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14319
## Rationale for this change
Allows to run extended tests on some PRs if needed, wh
Omega359 commented on PR #15101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15101#issuecomment-2708410057
Looks like it ran checks on the forked branch, I think that is what we want
--
andygrove commented on PR #1487:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1487#issuecomment-2708417311
failure:
```
Error: Errors:
Error:
ParquetEncryptionITCase>SparkFunSuite.run:69->SparkFunSuite.org$scalatest$BeforeAndAfterAll$$super$run:69->AnyFunSuite.org$
andygrove opened a new issue, #1488:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1488
### Describe the bug
`ParquetEncryptionITCase` fails with `native_iceberg_compat`
### Steps to reproduce
_No response_
### Expected behavior
_No response_
vmingchen opened a new pull request, #80:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/pull/80
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
timsaucer merged PR #1040:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1040
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...
robtandy commented on code in PR #79:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/pull/79#discussion_r1986161055
##
tpch/README.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+
+
+# Benchmarking DataFusion Ray on Kubernetes
+
+This is a rough guide to deploying and benchmarking DataFusion Ray on
K
robtandy commented on code in PR #79:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/pull/79#discussion_r1986161334
##
tpch/README.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+
+
+# Benchmarking DataFusion Ray on Kubernetes
+
+This is a rough guide to deploying and benchmarking DataFusion Ray on
K
kylebarron commented on PR #982:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/982#issuecomment-2708499224
There needs to be an initial import `from __future__ import annotations` on
the first line to be able to use `|` typing syntax.
There are ruff rules to check this and we
irenjj commented on code in PR #15100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15100#discussion_r1986188763
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/limit.rs:
##
@@ -109,8 +109,12 @@ impl DisplayAs for GlobalLimitExec {
)
}
DisplayFormatT
timsaucer commented on PR #982:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/982#issuecomment-2708552064
Thanks, Kyle. More generally I’ll see about the impact of turning on all the
rules and then removing a few specifically as needed
--
This is an automated message from the Apa
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #1481:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1481#discussion_r1986199136
##
.github/workflows/pr_build.yml:
##
@@ -40,12 +40,31 @@ env:
RUST_VERSION: stable
jobs:
+ linux-test-rust:
+strategy:
+ matrix:
+
clflushopt commented on issue #14608:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14608#issuecomment-2708672112
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
ctsk commented on code in PR #15044:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15044#discussion_r1983234072
##
datafusion/physical-expr/src/aggregate.rs:
##
@@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ impl AggregateExprBuilder {
}
}
+/// Constructs an `AggregateFunctionExpr` from
mvzink commented on code in PR #1757:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1757#discussion_r1986222154
##
src/ast/mod.rs:
##
@@ -2947,6 +2947,17 @@ pub enum Statement {
variables: OneOrManyWithParens,
value: Vec,
},
+
+/// ```sq
mvzink commented on code in PR #1757:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1757#discussion_r1986222154
##
src/ast/mod.rs:
##
@@ -2947,6 +2947,17 @@ pub enum Statement {
variables: OneOrManyWithParens,
value: Vec,
},
+
+/// ```sq
zebsme opened a new pull request, #15103:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15103
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Close #15024
- Part of #14914
## What changes are included in this PR?
1. Implement AggregateExec
2. Update related tes
iffyio commented on code in PR #1757:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1757#discussion_r1986233456
##
src/ast/mod.rs:
##
@@ -2947,6 +2947,17 @@ pub enum Statement {
variables: OneOrManyWithParens,
value: Vec,
},
+
+/// ```sq
qazxcdswe123 closed pull request #15099: refactor: rm
`single_distinct_to_groupby` optimizer pass
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15099
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
qazxcdswe123 commented on issue #14586:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14586#issuecomment-2708702633
> Queries like `avg(distinct a)` rely on this rule, and without it, they
cannot be executed anymore.
>
> The following query is available on the main branch, but not
zhuqi-lucas opened a new pull request, #15104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15104
## Which issue does this PR close?
This is the first step of our incremental work for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15096
## Rationale for this ch
zhuqi-lucas commented on issue #15096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15096#issuecomment-2708703567
- [ ] Config: Add support default sql varchar to view types
Submitted a PR for the first step of our incremental work:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/1510
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #15090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15090#discussion_r1986194642
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/order.slt:
##
@@ -985,13 +985,20 @@ drop table ambiguity_test;
statement ok
create table t(a0 int, a int, b int, c int)
qazxcdswe123 commented on code in PR #15014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15014#discussion_r1986032404
##
datafusion/sql/src/expr/function.rs:
##
@@ -349,6 +349,12 @@ impl SqlToRel<'_, S> {
} else {
// User defined aggregate functions (UDA
Standing-Man commented on issue #15086:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15086#issuecomment-2708093826
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific commen
2010YOUY01 opened a new issue, #15088:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15088
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
Now sort executor and aggregate executor both support executing in parallel,
and the degree of parallelism is specified in confi
Shreyaskr1409 opened a new issue, #15089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15089
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
a part of #14914
### Describe the solution you'd like
No response
### Describe alternatives you've considered
No resp
milenkovicm opened a new issue, #15087:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15087
### Describe the bug
There might be a regression on v46
After updating to 46.0.0 there is a `stack overflow` calling
`PhysicalPlanNode::try_from_physical_plan` on a relatively simple
Shreyaskr1409 commented on issue #15089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15089#issuecomment-2708158548
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
alamb commented on issue #15065:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15065#issuecomment-2708162324
> [@alamb](https://github.com/alamb) Hello, have you made any progress?
Hi @chenquan -- I am not actively working on this issue and don't think I
will have any plans to do
qazxcdswe123 opened a new pull request, #15094:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15094
-o takes a filepath not a folder
Otherwise it shows: `Error: IoError(Os { code: 21, kind: IsADirectory,
message: "Is a directory" })`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
alamb commented on issue #15065:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15065#issuecomment-2708201014
> [@alamb](https://github.com/alamb) Hello, thank you very much! In
addition, I want to know how to control the cancellation of tasks by myself.
Currently, I have observed that th
alamb commented on code in PR #15066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15066#discussion_r1986065671
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/partial_sort.rs:
##
@@ -226,10 +226,15 @@ impl DisplayAs for PartialSortExec {
None => write!(f, "PartialS
tustvold commented on PR #14286:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14286#issuecomment-2708240200
FWIW the new HttpClient abstraction, introduced in ObjectStore 0.12,
provides a potentially nicer way to spawn IO on to a separate runtime -
https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/
chenkovsky commented on PR #15033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15033#issuecomment-2708243765
by the way, If I change tokio to single thread, there's also no stack
overflow.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please lo
alamb commented on code in PR #15082:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15082#discussion_r1986071622
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/explain_tree.slt:
##
@@ -519,6 +519,150 @@ physical_plan
17)│ format: arrow │
18)└───┘
andygrove opened a new pull request, #1487:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1487
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## How are these changes
jonahgao commented on code in PR #15099:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15099#discussion_r1986094870
##
datafusion/optimizer/src/optimizer.rs:
##
@@ -240,7 +239,6 @@ impl Optimizer {
// Filters can't be pushed down past Limits, we should do
PushDown
Weijun-H merged PR #15049:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15049
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
zjregee opened a new pull request, #15100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15100
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #15026.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
Implement tree explain for `GlobalLimitExec`.
## Are these c
timsaucer commented on code in PR #1016:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1016#discussion_r1983239116
##
src/dataframe.rs:
##
@@ -50,6 +52,22 @@ use crate::{
expr::{sort_expr::PySortExpr, PyExpr},
};
+#[pyclass(name = "TableProvider", module = "data
danila-b commented on code in PR #14331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14331#discussion_r1986110748
##
.github/workflows/extended.yml:
##
@@ -33,16 +33,46 @@ on:
push:
branches:
- main
+ issue_comment:
+types: [created]
+
+permissions:
+ pul
zebsme commented on issue #15024:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15024#issuecomment-2708407584
hi @alamb , I notice that DuckDB provides full expressions for aggregations
while only index for group_by
```
┌─┴─┐
HASH_GROUP_BY
│
kazantsev-maksim opened a new pull request, #1490:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1490
## Which issue does this PR close?
Related to issue: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1459
Closes #.
Defined under Issue: https://github.com/apach
qazxcdswe123 commented on issue #14586:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14586#issuecomment-2708191051
> On optimizer side, I am not sure if `single_distinct_to_groupby` can
really improve performance in current version (it is an old rule introduced in
long long ago), maybe
chenquan commented on issue #15065:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15065#issuecomment-2708191516
> > [@alamb](https://github.com/alamb) Hello, have you made any progress?
>
> Hi [@chenquan](https://github.com/chenquan) -- I am not actively working
on this issue and d
alamb commented on code in PR #15074:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15074#discussion_r1986048918
##
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/enforce_distribution.rs:
##
@@ -442,40 +445,30 @@ impl TestConfig {
self.config.execution.target_partitions = ta
milenkovicm opened a new pull request, #1196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1196
# Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #1193.
# Rationale for this change
# What changes are included in this PR?
# Are there any user-faci
alamb commented on issue #15024:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15024#issuecomment-2708194671
> > [@zebsme](https://github.com/zebsme) how is this going? I noticed you
took this and [#15025](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15025) and
[#15026](https://github.co
blaginin opened a new issue, #15092:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15092
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13672 adds a new CLI integration
testing with external storage tests, using Minio. Curre
alamb commented on code in PR #15082:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15082#discussion_r1986051520
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/explain_tree.slt:
##
@@ -519,6 +519,150 @@ physical_plan
17)│ format: arrow │
18)└───┘
Shreyaskr1409 commented on issue #15093:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15093#issuecomment-2708197604
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
alamb commented on code in PR #15084:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15084#discussion_r1986064733
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/explain_tree.slt:
##
@@ -519,6 +519,36 @@ physical_plan
17)│ format: arrow │
18)└───┘
+
alamb commented on code in PR #15079:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15079#discussion_r1986065410
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/explain_tree.slt:
##
@@ -519,6 +534,51 @@ physical_plan
17)│ format: arrow │
18)└───┘
+
alamb commented on issue #15096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15096#issuecomment-2708225278
Please add comments if you find other needed items / issues
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and us
alamb commented on code in PR #15081:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15081#discussion_r1986065534
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -370,8 +370,15 @@ impl DisplayAs for SortMergeJoinExec {
)
}
alamb commented on code in PR #15091:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15091#discussion_r1986065791
##
datafusion/common/src/dfschema.rs:
##
@@ -1034,7 +1034,7 @@ impl SchemaExt for Schema {
.iter()
.zip(other.fields().iter())
blaginin commented on code in PR #13672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13672#discussion_r1984937074
##
datafusion-cli/CONTRIBUTING.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+
+
+# Development instructions
+
+## Running Tests
+
+Tests can be run using `cargo`
+
+```shell
+cargo te
Weijun-H commented on PR #15049:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15049#issuecomment-2708311998
Thanks @Blizzara and @alamb 👍
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the sp
Weijun-H closed issue #13515: Deprecate `ScalarUDFImpl::invoke_batch` and move
everything to `ScalarUDFImpl::invoke_with_args`
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13515
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
andygrove commented on issue #1441:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1441#issuecomment-2708452642
One more for the list: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1488
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, ple
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1048
Bumps [datafusion-substrait](https://github.com/apache/datafusion) from
45.0.0 to 46.0.0.
Commits
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/commit/d5ca8307940c1a6345419a2c8d9
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1051:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1051
Bumps [datafusion](https://github.com/apache/datafusion) from 45.0.0 to
46.0.0.
Commits
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/commit/d5ca8307940c1a6345419a2c8d91ef8770465
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1049:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1049
Bumps [datafusion-proto](https://github.com/apache/datafusion) from 45.0.0
to 46.0.0.
Commits
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/commit/d5ca8307940c1a6345419a2c8d91ef8
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1047:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1047
Bumps [tokio](https://github.com/tokio-rs/tokio) from 1.43.0 to 1.44.0.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/tokio-rs/tokio/releases";>tokio's releases.
Tokio
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1046:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1046
Bumps [async-trait](https://github.com/dtolnay/async-trait) from 0.1.86 to
0.1.87.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/dtolnay/async-trait/releases";>async-trait's
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #11288:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11288#issuecomment-2705347408
Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale
because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale
label or comment or
zebsme commented on issue #15024:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15024#issuecomment-2708135023
> @zebsme how is this going? I noticed you took this and
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15025 and
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15026
>
> If yo
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #15090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15090#discussion_r1986038458
##
datafusion/sql/tests/sql_integration.rs:
##
@@ -54,15 +54,6 @@ use sqlparser::dialect::{Dialect, GenericDialect,
HiveDialect, MySqlDialect};
mod cases;
mo
alamb merged PR #14995:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14995
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #14995:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14995#issuecomment-2708164015
Thanks again @shruti2522 and @comphead
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
alamb closed issue #9152: doc: RecordBatchReceiverStreamBuilder::spawn_blocking
does not abort threads
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9152
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
milenkovicm opened a new pull request, #1201:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1201
# Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #1164
# Rationale for this change
regular update to latest datafusion which brings support for `INSERT INTO`
# W
alamb commented on issue #15092:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15092#issuecomment-2708204616
I think @Omega359 did something similar here with sqllogictests for starting
postgres:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/main/datafusion/sqllogictest/bin/postgres_c
blaginin commented on code in PR #13672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13672#discussion_r1986051734
##
datafusion-cli/CONTRIBUTING.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+
+
+# Development instructions
+
+## Running Tests
+
+Tests can be run using `cargo`
+
+```shell
+cargo te
timsaucer commented on PR #1019:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1019#issuecomment-2708285597
Hi @kosiew I moved this to draft since it looks like you're doing a good job
on the upstream work which would change how we would want to handle this.
--
This is an automat
irenjj commented on issue #15093:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15093#issuecomment-2708287445
> #14032
Hi, @Shreyaskr1409 , maybe we don't need to implement the explain format
since it's deprecated. cc @jonathanc-n .
I've noticed you've picked other tasks, maybe
timsaucer commented on PR #982:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/982#issuecomment-2708291557
I added a few lines to the documentation, rebased, and applied updated ruff
formatting.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message
timsaucer opened a new issue, #1045:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1045
**Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe
what you are trying to do.**
#982 added convenience functions to use a global context for operations like
`re
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
