alamb commented on issue #14389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14389#issuecomment-2628908272
> I also was very confused to find the [Rust Version Compatibility
Policy](https://github.com/apache/datafusion#rust-version-compatibility-policy)
in the README.md
As long
jayzhan211 commented on PR #14268:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14268#issuecomment-2628913239
> > So what is the actual regressions to be resolved? I don't remember
signature coericible is consistent with the docs before so it is not a
regression to be fixed now. If suppor
alamb opened a new pull request, #14397:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14397
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14008
## Rationale for this change
Need to release
## What changes are included in
bubbajoe closed issue #6694: bug: array_position not working as expected
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/6694
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
alamb commented on code in PR #14395:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14395#discussion_r1938255523
##
datafusion/core/tests/dataframe/mod.rs:
##
@@ -3325,6 +3326,74 @@ async fn unnest_columns() -> Result<()> {
Ok(())
}
+#[tokio::test]
+async fn unnest_dict
alamb opened a new issue, #14396:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14396
### Describe the bug
When coercing structs with different types DataFusion is inconsistent in its
behavior. Sometimes it errors and in other times it is inconsistent
### To Reproduc
alamb commented on code in PR #14384:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14384#discussion_r1938257756
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/type_coercion/binary.rs:
##
@@ -961,23 +961,31 @@ fn struct_coercion(lhs_type: &DataType, rhs_type:
&DataType) -> Option
alamb commented on issue #14008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14008#issuecomment-2628923232
I have created a PR for a version increase and
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14397
Once that is approved / merged I'll create a release-45 branch to make RC
alamb closed issue #14383: `Case` coercion of Structs loses field names
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14383
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
alamb commented on PR #14057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14057#issuecomment-2628924834
Update here is we are very close to cutting the 45 release branch. See
- More details on
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14008#issuecomment-2628923232
Once we do t
alamb opened a new pull request, #14398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14398
## Which issue does this PR close?
I noticed this unnecessary dependency while working on
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14008
## Rationale for this change
alamb commented on code in PR #14398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14398#discussion_r1938262671
##
datafusion-cli/Cargo.toml:
##
@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ datafusion = { path = "../datafusion/core", version =
"44.0.0", features = [
"unicode_expressions",
"co
alamb merged PR #14384:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14384
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #13664:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13664#issuecomment-2628924982
Update here is we are very close to cutting the 45 release branch. See
- More details on
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14008#issuecomment-2628923232
Once we do t
alamb commented on PR #14276:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14276#issuecomment-2628925076
Update here is we are very close to cutting the 45 release branch. See
- More details on
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14008#issuecomment-2628923232
I plan to me
alamb commented on PR #14391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14391#issuecomment-2628925389
I merged up from main to make sure CI is running on the latest commit. Once
tests pass I plan to merge
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
alamb commented on PR #14391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14391#issuecomment-2628930486
I have to go do something else now -- @timsaucer any chance you can figure
out the CI failure?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message
chenkovsky commented on PR #14057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14057#issuecomment-2628928295
> Update here is we are very close to cutting the 45 release branch. See
>
> * More details on [Release DataFusion `45.0.0` #14008
(comment)](https://github.com/apache/dataf
alamb commented on PR #14391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14391#issuecomment-2628929574
The CI failure
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/actions/runs/13088375990/job/3651854?pr=14391
Seems to be due to a logical conflict with
https://github.com/apache/dat
jayzhan211 commented on PR #14268:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14268#issuecomment-2628936121
@shehabgamin can we try to use coerce types for those functions, the change
is relatively trivial and less breakage compare to the current one
--
This is an automated message fr
iffyio merged PR #1698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1698
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr
jayzhan211 commented on PR #14268:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14268#issuecomment-2628939208
> @shehabgamin can we try to use Singatur::User-defined coerce types for
those functions, the change is relatively trivial and the impact is smaller
than the current one
@f
milenkovicm closed pull request #1171: doc: update ballista client front page
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1171
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
chenkovsky commented on PR #14057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14057#issuecomment-2629205242
@alamb @adriangb please review it again. I copied some tests from @adriangb
and some tests from spark, supported join, project, subqueryalias and
dataframe api.
--
This is an
chenkovsky commented on PR #14057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14057#issuecomment-2629206595
> Great let's fix those unit tests on your branch then we can look at the
pros/cons of the approaches we've come up with.
I don't know whether you agree, when make a design,
shehabgamin commented on PR #14268:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14268#issuecomment-2629245515
> If the approach looks good to you too, we can go ahead!
Sounds good! This works for now since we'll be working towards a better
design in the future.
I may add a new `
jayzhan211 commented on PR #14268:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14268#issuecomment-2629247219
> > If the approach looks good to you too, we can go ahead!
>
> Sounds good! This works for now since we'll be working towards a better
design in the future.
>
> I ma
adriangb commented on issue #14406:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14406#issuecomment-2629268321
Here's an assortment of test plans under slight variations that both contain
the bug and not.
```
ataFusion CLI v44.0.0
> explain analyze
with selection as (
adriangb commented on issue #14406:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14406#issuecomment-2629269661
Here's another angle of attack. If I disable the optimizer I end up with 12
partitions and... 12 output rows.
```
DataFusion CLI v44.0.0
> with selection as (
ozankabak commented on issue #14373:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14373#issuecomment-2629269833
I will think about some optimizer-focused projects and circle back next
week. @alamb, IMHO the tickets you mention are partly optimizer related, but
probably more so about the
shehabgamin commented on code in PR #14392:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14392#discussion_r1938420167
##
datafusion/spark/src/agg_funcs/avg.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license a
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14402:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14402#discussion_r1938420622
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/first_last.rs:
##
@@ -559,29 +550,18 @@ impl LastValueAccumulator {
let sort_columns = ordering_values
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14402:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14402#discussion_r1938420622
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/first_last.rs:
##
@@ -559,29 +550,18 @@ impl LastValueAccumulator {
let sort_columns = ordering_values
jkosh44 commented on code in PR #14289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14289#discussion_r1938280439
##
datafusion/physical-expr/src/scalar_function.rs:
##
@@ -186,6 +187,15 @@ impl PhysicalExpr for ScalarFunctionExpr {
.map(|e| e.evaluate(batch))
jkosh44 commented on PR #14289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14289#issuecomment-2629048825
@jayzhan211 I just pushed another commit that will correctly return null for
batch inputs. This also updates the behavior of `array_pop_front`,
`array_pop_back`, and array slicing (i
timsaucer closed pull request #968: build(deps): bump tokio from 1.41.1 to
1.42.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/968
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specif
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #968:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/968#issuecomment-2628955424
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when
a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next
major or minor ver
timsaucer commented on PR #968:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/968#issuecomment-2628955407
Close due to no longer applicable
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
blaginin commented on PR #14402:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14402#issuecomment-2628995591
```
groupmain
new_lexcmp
first_last_ignore_nulls 2.02 4.3±0
alamb commented on code in PR #14297:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14297#discussion_r1938285557
##
datafusion/physical-optimizer/src/pruning.rs:
##
@@ -287,11 +285,6 @@ pub trait PruningStatistics {
/// predicate can never possibly be true). The container ca
alamb commented on PR #14397:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14397#issuecomment-2628967728
Thank you for the review @andygrove -- I will merge this in shortly after
one more round of changelog updates and get a release branch started
--
This is an automated message from t
cht42 opened a new issue, #14400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14400
### Describe the bug
`map_keys` and `map_values` should return `null` instead of empty array for
`null` inputs
### To Reproduce
_No response_
### Expected behavior
_No
adriangb commented on PR #14057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14057#issuecomment-2629001039
Great let's fix those unit tests on your branch then we can look at the
pros/cons of the approaches we've come up with.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service
alamb merged PR #14397:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14397
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
rluvaton commented on code in PR #14282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14282#discussion_r1938303236
##
datafusion/functions/src/regex/regexpextract.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor li
alamb commented on issue #14008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14008#issuecomment-2629031385
I have created a branch:
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/tree/branch-45
Let's start merging stuff to main again.
Before I make the RC I want to verify again
shehabgamin commented on PR #14392:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14392#issuecomment-2629161924
> cc @Blizzara and @shehabgamin as you have mentioned interest in helping
here
>
Will catch up on this thread tonight. So much happening so fast, exciting!
--
Th
sgrebnov opened a new pull request, #14407:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14407
## Which issue does this PR close?
Unparser dialects specify timestamp data type overrides via
`timestamp_cast_dtype` which is NOT currently used when converting timestamp
literals result
alamb merged PR #13664:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13664
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #13664:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13664#issuecomment-2629058844
🚀
BTW @mkarbo and @eliaperantoni it would be great to write a blog post about
this feature / solicit some additional help
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
alamb commented on PR #13664:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13664#issuecomment-2629059247
@eliaperantoni / @mkarbo -- any chance you can file a `"EPIC" ticket listing
the various subtasks you highlighted on
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13664#issuecomment-262019
alamb closed issue #13662: Add related source code locations to errors
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13662
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14289#discussion_r1938285811
##
datafusion/physical-expr/src/scalar_function.rs:
##
@@ -186,6 +187,15 @@ impl PhysicalExpr for ScalarFunctionExpr {
.map(|e| e.evaluate(batch))
adriangb opened a new issue, #14406:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14406
### Describe the bug
Outer limits seem to be able to impact the inner limits of a subquery
### To Reproduce
Run the following python script to create test data:
```python
alamb commented on issue #14008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14008#issuecomment-2629106680
Thanks @Omega359
The delta-rs upgrade seems to have gone pretty smootly:
https://github.com/delta-io/delta-rs/pull/3175
In terms of releasing DataFusion 45 I think i
logan-keede commented on issue #13351:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13351#issuecomment-2629106897
Do we want go with this?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git S
kevinjqliu commented on issue #14008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14008#issuecomment-2629109322
hey @alamb quick question about the release process, are the release for
datafusion and datafusion-python in locksteps? I see the next release for
datafusion is 45.0.0 meanwh
adriangb commented on issue #14406:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14406#issuecomment-2629110100
@alamb this is not new (should not block release) but seems like a pretty
major bug
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pl
cht42 commented on code in PR #14401:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14401#discussion_r1938281147
##
datafusion/functions-nested/src/map_keys.rs:
##
@@ -126,9 +126,36 @@ fn map_keys_inner(args: &[ArrayRef]) -> Result {
};
Ok(Arc::new(ListArray::new(
-
cht42 commented on code in PR #14401:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14401#discussion_r1938281147
##
datafusion/functions-nested/src/map_keys.rs:
##
@@ -126,9 +126,36 @@ fn map_keys_inner(args: &[ArrayRef]) -> Result {
};
Ok(Arc::new(ListArray::new(
-
Rachelint commented on code in PR #14399:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14399#discussion_r1938281192
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/median.rs:
##
@@ -242,14 +242,26 @@ impl Debug for MedianAccumulator {
impl Accumulator for MedianAccumulator {
fn
cht42 opened a new pull request, #14401:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14401
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #14400.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes tested
2010YOUY01 commented on code in PR #14399:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14399#discussion_r1938282667
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/median.rs:
##
@@ -242,14 +242,26 @@ impl Debug for MedianAccumulator {
impl Accumulator for MedianAccumulator {
fn
getChan commented on code in PR #14371:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14371#discussion_r1938297005
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/errors.slt:
##
@@ -161,3 +161,12 @@ create table records (timestamp timestamp, value float) as
values (
'2021-01-01 00:
getChan commented on code in PR #14371:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14371#discussion_r1938297005
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/errors.slt:
##
@@ -161,3 +161,12 @@ create table records (timestamp timestamp, value float) as
values (
'2021-01-01 00:
andygrove commented on code in PR #14392:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14392#discussion_r1938313126
##
datafusion/spark/src/agg_funcs/avg.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agr
getChan commented on code in PR #14371:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14371#discussion_r1938313572
##
datafusion/common/src/error.rs:
##
@@ -131,6 +131,10 @@ pub enum DataFusionError {
/// Errors from either mapping LogicalPlans to/from Substrait plans
getChan commented on code in PR #14371:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14371#discussion_r1938315198
##
datafusion/common/src/error.rs:
##
@@ -131,6 +131,10 @@ pub enum DataFusionError {
/// Errors from either mapping LogicalPlans to/from Substrait plans
blaginin opened a new pull request, #14402:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14402
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14215
## Rationale for this change
Right now, merging / updating batches in `first_value`
timsaucer commented on PR #14391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14391#issuecomment-2628942411
> I have to go do something else now -- @timsaucer any chance you can figure
out the CI failure?
Yes, I can do this right now
--
This is an automated message from the Apac
timsaucer commented on code in PR #1000:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1000#discussion_r1938270795
##
src/config.rs:
##
@@ -40,7 +42,7 @@ impl PyConfig {
#[staticmethod]
pub fn from_env() -> PyResult {
Review Comment:
Excellent suggestion!
alamb merged PR #14393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14393
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on issue #14008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14008#issuecomment-2628949060
@wiedld tested with InfluxDB and this upgrade works for us
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and us
alamb commented on code in PR #14387:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14387#discussion_r1938309570
##
datafusion/core/tests/dataframe/mod.rs:
##
@@ -1121,6 +1121,39 @@ async fn join() -> Result<()> {
Ok(())
}
+#[tokio::test]
+async fn join_coercion_unnname
alamb closed issue #13510: Regression: `Invalid comparison operation: Utf8 ==
Utf8View` error during LEFT ANTI JOIN
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13510
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th
alamb commented on PR #13664:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13664#issuecomment-2629032156
I have made a release branch for 45 so let's get this one merged now
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14008#issuecomment-2628923232
I merged up from main to resolv
alamb commented on PR #14276:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14276#issuecomment-2629032363
We have a release branch for 45 now -- see
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14008#issuecomment-2628923232
Let's keep the main moving!
--
This is an automated messa
alamb commented on PR #14268:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14268#issuecomment-2629035590
Given I feel like we have not yet reached consensus on this issue I made a
release branch for 45 without this change
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14008#issuecomment-
alamb commented on PR #14276:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14276#issuecomment-2629032401
Thanks again @pepijnve
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
alamb closed issue #14275: Avoid deriving Fields for each invocation of
`struct` and `named_struct`
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14275
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to g
alamb merged PR #14276:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14276
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb merged PR #14387:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14387
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on code in PR #14387:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14387#discussion_r1938309987
##
datafusion/core/tests/dataframe/mod.rs:
##
@@ -1121,6 +1121,39 @@ async fn join() -> Result<()> {
Ok(())
}
+#[tokio::test]
+async fn join_coercion_unnname
alamb opened a new pull request, #14403:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14403
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Follow on to https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14387
## Rationale for this change
@jonahgao found a typo 🤦
https://github.com/apach
alamb commented on PR #14387:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14387#issuecomment-2629032730
Thanks for the review @jonahgao
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spe
alamb commented on code in PR #14371:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14371#discussion_r1938310453
##
datafusion/common/src/error.rs:
##
@@ -131,6 +131,10 @@ pub enum DataFusionError {
/// Errors from either mapping LogicalPlans to/from Substrait plans
/
alamb commented on code in PR #14392:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14392#discussion_r1938312400
##
datafusion/spark/src/agg_funcs/avg.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreeme
alamb commented on code in PR #14392:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14392#discussion_r1938312603
##
datafusion/spark/src/comet_scalar_funcs.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license ag
alamb commented on PR #13664:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13664#issuecomment-2629041356
And merged up again due to another conflict... 🤦
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
andygrove commented on code in PR #14392:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14392#discussion_r1938313058
##
datafusion/spark/src/agg_funcs/avg.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agr
getChan commented on code in PR #14371:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14371#discussion_r1938313572
##
datafusion/common/src/error.rs:
##
@@ -131,6 +131,10 @@ pub enum DataFusionError {
/// Errors from either mapping LogicalPlans to/from Substrait plans
mattwparas commented on issue #434:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/434#issuecomment-2629047198
awesome, thank you for the update!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above t
nuno-faria opened a new pull request, #14405:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14405
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #14404.
## Rationale for this change
Provide examples using the most up-to-date API.
## What changes are inc
nuno-faria opened a new issue, #14404:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14404
### Describe the bug
The code example in `library-user-guide/adding-udfs` appears to use an older
syntax, resulting in compilation errors.
### To Reproduce
Execute the code prov
Omega359 commented on issue #14008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14008#issuecomment-2629085175
I just upgraded my project to latest main from DF 42. The primary
compilation and test suite issues I encountered after setting
`datafusion.execution.parquet.schema_force_view_
timsaucer closed issue #971: Add instructions to reduce rebuild time
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/971
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
timsaucer merged PR #1000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1000
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #1002:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1002#issuecomment-2628954719
Looks like uuid is up-to-date now, so this is no longer needed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on t
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #1002: build(deps): bump uuid from 1.12.0
to 1.12.1
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1002
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
blaginin commented on code in PR #14402:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14402#discussion_r1938293491
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/first_last.rs:
##
@@ -627,24 +607,19 @@ impl Accumulator for LastValueAccumulator {
// last index contains is_set f
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
